I was under the impression that was common knowledge that the nazis were all well treated by murrican and british, that after the war they were welcomed?
Isn't common knowledge?
Isn't common knowledge?
I edited my response after more reading.
EDIT:
After reading more on this subject it appears that a lot of this came from not USAID, but the State Department. Regardless it is still insane wasting of taxpayer dollars and should be stopped.
It's really unfair to try to bring facts to a discussion. It's hilarious and sad that he just threw his hands up in the air with the "Let the courts decide" deflection.But that was not the point
They are still lies and you have doubled down on lies and you still believe them
I understand that you don't always agree on what the government is spending money on and sometimes it clearly has some political bias. But what I don't understand (rationally) is why people are concerned about the pebbles you can find in DEI projects, when there are boulders within the system which would matter far more economical.But that was not the point
They are still lies and you have doubled down on lies and you still believe them
And when the courts found him guilty on 34 counts and adjudicated rape he throws up his hands and yells woke conspiracy … deep state.It's really unfair to try to bring facts to a discussion. It's hilarious and sad that he just threw his hands up in the air with the "Let the courts decide" deflection.
But that is true for all his criminal prosecution.... Sadly his base believes him.And when the courts found him guilty on 34 counts and adjudicated rape he throws up his hands and yells woke conspiracy … deep state.
Fossil fuel subsidies still strangely missing from any cost saving cuts, I think?I understand that you don't always agree on what the government is spending money on and sometimes it clearly has some political bias. But what I don't understand (rationally) is why people are concerned about the pebbles you can find in DEI projects, when there are boulders within the system which would matter far more economical.
The only logical reason is that the politics are more important than the economic aspect, but they excuse their politics with economic reasoning, because otherwise it would be obviously racist, homophobic and misogynistic.
It’s worse than that. The Trump administration is planning to use the Defense Production Act to pay fossil fuel companies to conduct activities that the market doesn’t support or need. The Trump admin is pretending that we have an “energy emergency” and is pulling out the stops to make sure we over produce fossil fuels.Fossil fuel subsidies still strangely missing from any cost saving cuts, I think?
There's a difference between a scientist and a top level scientist.
Woosh..He's a Catholic Fundamentalist. It's funny nobody uses that term in reference to Catholics. I guess I'm just indulging myself.
That's the problem though - by then it will be too late. The damage they are doing will not be easily undone.
The courts are not designed to deal with an executive that no longer feels bound by the Constitution. They aren't able to act swiftly enough to protect the public.
I don't care what they cost. I don't agree taxpayer money should be used for it.
But it can be quite expensive IAW this chart:
How Much Does Female-to-Male (FTM) Surgery Cost in 2025?
How Much Does Female-to-Male (FTM) Surgery Cost in 2025?us-uk.bookimed.com
🗽United States: $15,000 - $138,000.
That sure sounds constitutional.... ignoring the fact that we don't need laws as long as the Republicans are in charge...Courts will stop it, right?
Speaker Mike Johnson floats eliminating federal courts as GOP ramps up attacks on judges
Republican lawmakers are setting their sights on the judiciary following court rulings that have halted Trump's agenda.www.nbcnews.com
I like how when Trump is caught with top secret documents in his bathroom next to a copier conservatives are like ‘let’s see how this plays out in the courts’ and when this happens they are just like ‘lol such is life’.View attachment 120678
I can see why they don't want to answer the district court's questions, because they're fucking up big time. WTF, this stuff is monstrous.
But please, conservative posters tell me how both sides might have a point and the truth is somewhere in the middle.
How can we possibly know what truth is? We must not believe our lying eyes and ears, and trust only in the courts. Also, who cares what the biased courts say?I like how when Trump is caught with top secret documents in his bathroom next to a copier conservatives are like ‘let’s see how this plays out in the courts’ and when this happens they are just like ‘lol such is life’.
Kind of a pattern - next it will be nose piercing...View attachment 120678
I can see why they don't want to answer the district court's questions, because they're fucking up big time. WTF, this stuff is monstrous.
But please, conservative posters tell me how both sides might have a point and the truth is somewhere in the middle.
Another one for the annals of ‘imagine if Biden…’Another unconstitutional action by you guess the orange stain:
The sweeping order amends the federal voter registration form to require proof of citizenship in order to vote. It demands documentary proof for citizenship such as a passport to be eligible to vote in federal elections, empowers federal agencies to cut funding to states deemed non-compliant and instructs the Department of Justice to prosecute what the White House paints as “election crimes”.
The measure also seeks to block states from accepting mail-in ballots after election day, regardless of when they are mailed in.
Papers please.Trump signs executive order that will upend US voter registration processes
Millions of citizens could become disenfranchised in ‘farthest reaching’ executive action targeting immigrationwww.theguardian.com
The Republicans don’t even care about the paper; you’ll be purged anyway.Papers please.
Trump signs executive order that will upend US voter registration processes
Millions of citizens could become disenfranchised in ‘farthest reaching’ executive action targeting immigrationwww.theguardian.com