Changed again from N2P?N2X, oh yeah. Single core uplift be crazy
Ah okay, was thinking it was for desktop variants as wellIt looks like N2P is for mobile
Well it doesn't scale like that.so Zen 6 (10950x) could be around 80-90% faster than a 9950x?
1,12x higher clocks (min?) x 1,12x higher IPC (>10%?) x 1,5x cores = 88% performance gain.
it will be massive.
indeed, AMD's been using overdrive xtor options for DT CCDs ever since Raphael.Ah okay, was thinking it was for desktop variants as well
well just gonna be a lot less of a clk delta between DT and mobile, since Vmax is going down the drain.One slide he showed had >6GHz mentioned for Medusa Range. 9955HX has 5.4 GHz boost, so that's a minimum 12% 1T clock speed bump.
so Zen 6 (10950x) could be around 80-90% faster than a 9950x?
1,12x higher clocks (min?) x 1,12x higher IPC (>10%?) x 1,5x cores = 88% performance gain.
it will be massive.
I think he has got some good sources.Seems MILD got a better source? I mean since nobody is sayin' to ignore the information bc it comes from MILD?
For the love of God, I hope they do not use 5-digit numbers. These are just stupid and were equally stupid for Intel. They should just fall back to 3-digit numbers as has been done numerous times before:Unless AMD change the naming scheme to something like Ryzen 9 X695 AI+ Maxx Ultra it will be the 11000 series because every zen number change has always been a +2 to the name.
Zen 1 - 1000
Zen 2 - 3000
Zen 3 - 5000
Zen 4 - 7000
Zen 5 - 9000
Zen 6 - 11000
Ryzen 9 11950X3D would be absolutely ridiculous! (Come on, pronounce it verbally multiple times in a sentence. I dare you!)
Yeah.won't it be like really late 2026 at best?
Low Power Island sounds logical thing do do if it is chiplet CCD + IOD design.
I can see them to revert to 3-digit numbering.For the love of God, I hope they do not use 5-digit numbers. These are just stupid and were equally stupid for Intel. They should just fall back to 3-digit numbers as has been done numerous times before:
There is a reason so many car companies (and others) avoid 5 digits in product numbers. That's because it's stupid. Intel only did it because they had terminal brain cancer already; they did do the right thing and dropped back to 3 digits when they were still good.
- Intel going from Core lineup (Core 2 Quad Q9505) to "i" lineup (Core i7-990X)
- Nvidia going from GeForce 9800 GTX to GeForce GTX 280
- ATI going from Radeon HD 7970 to Radeon R9 290
- etc...
For AMD 2 of the 5 digits would be semantically useless on any actual CPU ever produced (and if there were an odd case for an extra number, they could just add a letter to that particular model).
Ryzen 9 11950X3D would be absolutely ridiculous! (Come on, pronounce it verbally multiple times in a sentence. I dare you!)
I'd much rather see them taking over their mobile naming and fixing the broken parts.E.g., something like Ryzen 495X and Ryzen 495X3D. It would have pushback for a few months but by next gen everybody would just accept it as normal.
Alas, if the same guys are at it that named the previous parts, you bet the actual name will be "RAIzen AI MAX++ 495AI3D (PRO)."
I heard Zen 5 with half the FPU cut out.So will ps6 have Zen6?
How brutal. Then AVX-512 will never take off.I heard Zen 5 with half the FPU cut out.
Why not, 256b implementation will do fine.How brutal. Then AVX-512 will never take off.
I don't know. 512-bits seems like the perfect marketing bullet point for a consoleWhy not, 256b implementation will do fine.