3070 and 3080 here: https://babeltechreviews.com/rtx-5060-ti-16gb-review/I really want to see 3070/3070 Ti and 2080/2080Ti comparisons along with ideally the 6800/6800XT from AMD.
I would be very tempted if that half board was available in 2.5 slot form. Kinda cute and easier to put in a build.First it was just the ROPs that were missing and now half the board is gone!
Perhaps they are trying to revive the dying console market. Joking aside; unless the current factors exacerbating costs subside, and the AI demand dies down, it is only going to get worse.Continues to make me incredibly frustrated with the viability of new GPUs under ~$550.
Ha, well with consoles pushing their prices north too - yeah, it is what it is.Perhaps they are trying to revive the dying console market. Joking aside; unless the current factors exacerbating costs subside, and the AI demand dies down, it is only going to get worse.
Shameless shill. My advice is don't waste your time on that channel.
Nvidia knew that, which is why they crippled it. There will be no more 1080 TIE mistakes. 3060 12GB is aging better. I would not opt for the better compute of the 3070, frame pacing issues, ugly textures, textures not loading, etc. ain't worth bigger bar better IMO.That said, its not like a 3070 for like $240 secondhand is unusable, but man... it could have been great.
Especially since a 7800 XT can be had for the same price as a 5060 Ti 16GB, pretty poor showing.Bonus vs 7800XT
With DLSS4 working on older RTX, being able to get MFG from an $8 app, and the long list of driver issues, this gen is a flop. The only thing it has going for it is a scarcity economy.Especially since a 7800 XT can be had for the same price as a 5060 Ti 16GB, pretty poor showing.
Thats because the 4060 Ti actually regressed vs the 3060 TI in some games. so the better results should be compared vs a 3060 Ti and then you realize just how much the 5060 Ti sucks compared to a 5 year old card.Despite the disappointing Average gain of 14.2%, in some games the gains are actually pretty good and in some the gain is miniscule.
I am talking about something else.Thats because the 4060 Ti actually regressed vs the 3060 TI in some games. so the better results should be compared vs a 3060 Ti and then you realize just how much the 5060 Ti sucks compared to a 5 year old card.
| Model | TBP | SM | CUDA | TMU | ROP | Real Boost (MHz) | TFLOPs | Texel Fillrate (Gtex/s) | Pixel Fillrate (Gpx/s) | Bandwidth (GB/s) | Average at 1440p |
| RTX 3060TI 8GB | 200 W | 38 | 4864 | 152 | 80 | 1875 | 18.24 | 285 | 150 | 448 | 100 % |
| RTX 4060TI 16GB | 165 W | 34 | 4352 | 136 | 48 | 2775 | 24.15 | 377.4 | 133.2 | 288 | 114.3 % |
| RTX 5060Ti 16GB | 180 W | 36 | 4,608 | 144 | 48 | 2670 | 24.61 | 384.5 | 128.16 | 448 | 129.6 % |
It may be beneficial in some cases (makeing "smooth" fps smoother) but that table just shows how bad the 8GB card is going to be...This is also very interesting. TPU
View attachment 122196
Frame generation for the win. 4x higher FPS along with 1.44x higher latency compared to Native.
I wanna know what is a better compromise.It may be beneficial in some cases (makeing "smooth" fps smoother) but that table just shows how bad the 8GB card is going to be...
I wanna know what is a better compromise.
Should I choose Transformer/Quality or Framegen 2x for ~56FPS etc.
But that's at the cost of image quality.Look at the latency numbers and I think you'll find your answer.
It's all about tradeoffs. It's very personal what people prefer.But that's at the cost of image quality.
But that's at the cost of image quality.
@Tup3x I prefer native, but It looks like unless I want to break my piggy bank in the future, I need to live with upscaling.