I searched but couldn't find video of it, but there are myriad sources explaining. Here's NBC's story on Bill Owens resignation, etc.
I searched but couldn't find video of it, but there are myriad sources explaining. Here's NBC's story on Bill Owens resignation, etc.We need to develop a national boycott tableau in resistance to the depredations of this federal administration. Make commercial entities fear the consequences of them caving into Trump's nefarious machinations. Paramount should be right up there if they water down 60 Minutes.
There's an article right now on front page of online New York Times about 60 Minutes airing their worry about Paramount influencing the program. Says that Scott Pelley explained this right on the program Sunday night. They didn't give a date for some reason (i.e. was that tonight or last Sunday?). I watched tonight's program and didn't see that. I turned it off at 7:53PM, which is usually the point where nothing of interest ensues. Maybe Scott came on after the ensuing commercial break and made a statement and I missed it. I suppose that's what happened.
It could be the final testament of mankind. That our hatred for others is greater than our love and preservation of self.The hate of migrant criminals seemed to be much greater than love of own rights and protections afforded under the law. And even now they don't have regrets about voting for Trump.. they just don't like the tariffs!
He has no beef; he knows how to spin the news - instead of the news being his being too chicken shit to do an interview it is how 60 minute edited an interview to help his opponent. See how effective his misdirect has become ?IIRC, 60 Minutes offered to interview Trump and he refused/declined. What's his fucking beef?
Yes, that is exactly what happened. They have lately had a “Last Minute” spot at the end where they do things like this.We need to develop a national boycott tableau in resistance to the depredations of this federal administration. Make commercial entities fear the consequences of them caving into Trump's nefarious machinations. Paramount should be right up there if they water down 60 Minutes.
There's an article right now on front page of online New York Times about 60 Minutes airing their worry about Paramount influencing the program. Says that Scott Pelley explained this right on the program Sunday night. They didn't give a date for some reason (i.e. was that tonight or last Sunday?). I watched tonight's program and didn't see that. I turned it off at 7:53PM, which is usually the point where nothing of interest ensues. Maybe Scott came on after the ensuing commercial break and made a statement and I missed it. I suppose that's what happened.
Toad and toadies say listen to the toad by toad's decree. Hear ye hear ye, come to me if you wanna know what this be. Which begs the question, why didn't any of the previous 46 presidents so decree? This is some weird shit.It's official, the Trump Regime is a "dictatorship".
Executive order saying that only the Leader can say what the law is.
The Leader is the law, as the courts had already stated that he isn't bound by "laws".
FactPost (@factpostnews.bsky.social)
Trump official announces that Trump has signed an executive order claiming that only the president can speak for “what the law is” (This is not how the Constitution works)bsky.app
The level of stupidity there is off the scale.
70% of those farmers workforce is undocumented (illegal) immigrants but they voted for Trump knowing he was going to target illegal immigrants. They are now likely to go bankrupt as the illegal immigrants are not turning up for work.
Personally I'd rather have voted for a dementia ridden Biden than destroy my income creating venture.
This has been known since before the election. Problem now is largest shareholder for Paramount (Ms. Ralston) wants the merger approved by the Trump Administration and looks like Trump is saying castrate 60 Minutes or no dice. This is a bitch.He has no beef; he knows how to spin the news - instead of the news being his being too chicken shit to do an interview it is how 60 minute edited an interview to help his opponent. See how effective his misdirect has become ?
Maybe we the people can roam the fields and pick our own? Just sayin'. I mean if the money's no good... Can't just let it rot in the fields.There better not be a bailout for the farmers
Fuck them
The main issue here is preemptive compliance. Like with Columbia or those law firms they would very likely win if they fought this but they seem to figure it’s not worth the fight and it’s better to surrender and get what you want in the short term.This has been known since before the election. Problem now is largest shareholder for Paramount (Ms. Ralston) wants the merger approved by the Trump Administration and looks like Trump is saying castrate 60 Minutes or no dice. This is a bitch.
Is Bernie really too old to run in 2028? Duh, he'll only be 87 on election day.The main issue here is preemptive compliance. Like with Columbia or those law firms they would very likely win if they fought this but they seem to figure it’s not worth the fight and it’s better to surrender and get what you want in the short term.
Let me know how that works out for you.There better not be a bailout for the farmers
Fuck them
Let me know how that works out for you.
I imagine large agriculture companies would simply buy out family farms for pennies on the dollar.Maybe we the people can roam the fields and pick our own? Just sayin'. I mean if the money's no good... Can't just let it rot in the fields.
We have a bingo!I imagine large agriculture companies would simply buy out family farms for pennies on the dollar.
So you really think letting farmers fail on a large scale is a good idea?ah yes, greenman back to support the white kind of welfare that he supports.
So you really think letting farmers fail on a large scale is a good idea?
No, it is stupid to put them in that situation in the first place.So you really think letting farmers fail on a large scale is a good idea?
I don’t know saint Reagan allowed it to happen in the 80s. No one starved and farmers still vote republican. Seems like there is no reason to do anything.So you really think letting farmers fail on a large scale is a good idea?
But this is what farmers voted for. Trade war and rounding up their workforce. Why prevent just that group from feeling the consequences of their actions?No, it is stupid to put them in that situation in the first place.
I am more concerned about me and my family and our darn eating habit!But this is what farmers voted for. Trade war and rounding up their workforce. Why prevent just that group from feeling the consequences of their actions?
So you really think letting farmers fail on a large scale is a good idea?
He got up and left in the middle of an interview with them because he didn't like a question.IIRC, 60 Minutes offered to interview Trump and he refused/declined. What's his fucking beef?