Truly, since lead paint chips have to be his favorite snack.Kind of surprised Felix is not fighting to put lead back into paint
All I know is the left wing enviro facists attempted to take over the country by eliminating our back yard BBQs, lawn mowers, ceiling fans, gas stoves, etc., etc, etc. They love taking freedom away from us.
Wikipedia is full of nonsense. For example, they claim fascism is only a "right wing" phenomenon. Yet, when you have things like environmental fascism such as forcing everyone into an EV by 2030, that does not seem to count.
Wikipedia is full of nonsense. For example, they claim fascism is only a "right wing" phenomenon. Yet, when you have things like environmental fascism such as forcing everyone into an EV by 2030, that does not seem to count.
Fair enough. I haven't read the article in a few years. There are heated discussions in the talk section IIRC. This is what peaked my interest back around 2020.That's a pathetically simplistic interpretation not only of "fascism" and environmentalism but even of the wikipedia article on the topic, which says a _lot_ more than simplistically saying it's "only a right wing phenomenon".
It even (correctly) mentions it has some small overlaps with the left, and some left-wing elements in its origins, before explaining pretty exhaustively why it is traditionally and most commonly considered a right-wing phenomenon (despite its small bits of overlap with leftism).
These things are always damn complicated. There absolutely _are_ fascist forms of environmentalism, but using the state to try and accelerate a shift to electric vehicles, for the good of all, is not one of them.
AI has so much garbage sometimes. I was watching a video about dinosaurs on YouTube a year or so ago. It was painful to watch.Wikipedia has moderators, Trump wants to erradicate that web since he want to hide the truth, the issue? it will damage Chat GPT and AI motors.
The plan was to phase out ICE by 2030, led by states such as California which had planned to ban their registration by that year. Leaving no alternative but to leave the state if you wanted ICE.forcing??
Can't you can still buy Hummers if you want to go the gas guzzling route..
I mean it'll cost you at the pump but you can still buy them!
Or is that fascism that gas guzzlers require you to buy too much gasoline so that's fascism? Is that it??
That isn’t fascism. Grabbing people off the streets and sending them to concentration camps is fascism, you fascist fuck.The plan was to phase out ICE by 2030, led by states such as California which had planned to ban their registration by that year.
That isn’t fascism. Grabbing people off the streets and sending them to concentration camps is fascism, you fascist fuck.
The plan was to phase out ICE by 2030, led by states such as California which had planned to ban their registration by that year. Leaving no alternative but to leave the state if you wanted ICE.
Of course it will be used for the worse, the issue is that Wikipedia still have humans. What they need to do is asking for a representation to moderate correctly the site. Simple as that.AI has so much garbage sometimes. I was watching a video about dinosaurs on YouTube a year or so ago. It was painful to watch.
It seemed to be narrated by Gomer Pyle, used the wrong inflection for sentences (every other sentence was just part of the video but the AI made it sound like a question or supposition).
But the worst part was the clear factual errors. Lots of AI generated content had factual errors. I make it a point to avoid them.
Two of my favorites are seatbelt and helmet laws. Oh, the fascism.Let's rephrase this for past mandates protested by the right-wing, shall we?
The plan was to phase out lead in gasoline by 1996, led by states such as California which had planned to ban it's sale by that year. Leaving no alternative but to leave the state if you wanted to breath in lead.
The plan was to phase out pollution spewing cars without catalytic converters by 1975, led by states such as California which had planned to ban their registration by that year. Leaving no alternative but to leave the state if you wanted to choke to death with smog lung attacks.
The plan was to phase out indoor smoking by 1995, led by states such as California which had planned to ban indoor smoking by that year. Leaving no alternative but to leave the state if you wanted force others to breath in your cigarette smoke.
EVERY SINGLE FORWARD STEP WE MAKE is protested by the regressive right because they are puppets for corporate robber barons.
All I know is the left wing enviro facists attempted to take over the country by eliminating our back yard BBQs, lawn mowers, ceiling fans, gas stoves, etc., etc, etc. They love taking freedom away from us.
Should I dig up videos of people complaining about seatbelt laws and laws against drinking and driving?Let's rephrase this for past mandates protested by the right-wing, shall we?
The plan was to phase out lead in gasoline by 1996, led by states such as California which had planned to ban it's sale by that year. Leaving no alternative but to leave the state if you wanted to breath in lead.
The plan was to phase out pollution spewing cars without catalytic converters by 1975, led by states such as California which had planned to ban their registration by that year. Leaving no alternative but to leave the state if you wanted to choke to death with smog lung attacks.
The plan was to phase out indoor smoking by 1995, led by states such as California which had planned to ban indoor smoking by that year. Leaving no alternative but to leave the state if you wanted force others to breath in your cigarette smoke.
EVERY SINGLE FORWARD STEP WE MAKE is protested by the regressive right because they are puppets for corporate robber barons.
Hey a few drinks relaxes the body so when there is an accident you're more flexible and won't be injured as badly. If you're locked into a seatbelt it's a death sentence because your body doesn't naturally move with the accident.Should I dig up videos of people complaining about seatbelt laws and laws against drinking and driving?
Wife Beating and Women Professionals too.Should I dig up videos of people complaining about seatbelt laws and laws against drinking and driving?
For new vehicle sales. Which is vastly different from "all vehicles in the state of California ".The plan was to phase out ICE by 2030, led by states such as California which had planned to ban their registration by that year. Leaving no alternative but to leave the state if you wanted ICE.
Hey a few drinks relaxes the body so when there is an accident you're more flexible and won't be injured as badly. If you're locked into a seatbelt it's a death sentence because your body doesn't naturally move with the accident.
/s
There is, though, a credible argument that says when drivers have seat-belts they are less careful about their driving. And while the seat-belt more-than-compensates for this with regard to the drivers themselves, it can actually increase the risk to those outside the vehicle.
That's the same logic that says the best safety-feature would be a big metal spike sticking out of the centre of the steering wheel. And that instead of crumple-zones and airbags, you want cars that will completely-and-instantly disintegrate if they hit a pedestrian, leaving the pedestrian unharmed but the car (and it's driver?) a write-off. I sometimes lean towards that logic, not entirely sure.
All I know is the left wing enviro facists attempted to take over the country by eliminating our back yard BBQs, lawn mowers, ceiling fans, gas stoves, etc., etc, etc. They love taking freedom away from us.
No, no, fascism is only when government does thing I don't likeYes, because as you know, when fascists take over a country, their first target is control of BBQs and Lawnmowers.
Not media and communications, or whatever government that is left, or the legal system, or the education system, or the Military.
So Trump is totally not a Fascist Dictator, because he hasn't come for your BBQ.
/s Because I fear some would actually think that makes total sense.