Hi,
a quick update, the PS works fine for me.
When I asked:
I did not realize that EPS12V 2.92 power (for CPU) comes actually from +12V - 45.8 A and it is more than enough for my setup, my GPU is 1030, this is not a gaming PC.
Corsair CX-M Series CX550M 550 Watt 80 PLUS Bronze Certified...
Hi all,
a question based on the link above:
Power Specifications
Rail
3.3V
5V
12V1
12V2
12V3
12V4
5VSB
-12V
Max. Power
Amps
24
24
18
18
22
22
3
54.1
Watts
120
649.2
15
3.6
Total Max. Power (W)
650
If the PS is going supply power to Ryzen 9 3950x...
What do the blue dips below 50-40 mean then?
How many red dips do you see?
There is this data on one side and the testimony that you quoted on the other. Which one you choose?
Myself, it is hard to argue with data.
The second chart is not bad actually. It has much longer x axis.
Vega is much better in terms of minimums, it does not stutter that much.
Vega appears to me to be a winner in this game. 1080Ti is all over the place. It's not good.
It appears you are not up to speed with this thread:
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/amd-radeon-rx-vega-64-and-56-reviews-updated-aug-28.2515492/page-51#post-39054642
AMD needs new features working flawlessly to compete with Volta. Their next release is far away.
As it stands, Fury to Vega performance increase is a "joke". Yes, 70%-80% faster for Navi when compared to launched Vega.
Navi would have those 50% already in so it would be only 20%-30% compared to...
Your request does not make any sense.
He said, the features are not enabled. Who can test something that is not enabled?
Then he continued... "if made to work..."
All of us are guessing what NGG might bring in the future. If AMD does not make it happen, I am not excluding that possibility, then...
I have a limited knowledge, I admit, but what I read about NGG makes me believe that we are not going to see a "regular" 15% increase from drivers that AMD was providing even without disable features in their HW before.
This appears to be a completely different scenario, a much bigger change...
NGG path being more than three times better than Native might translate to >50% gaming performance.
Maybe we should have a poll on this and see who makes the best estimate. :)
It appears to me he is missing the point big time.
From https://forum.beyond3d.com/posts/1998144/
If a software defined pipeline can be achieved on Vega, that's revolutionary.
The pipeline could be configured dynamically and it could be much more efficient use of the HW.
This extremely...
The results might be more affected by memory throughput than CPU capability.
Till the memory speeds are confirmed than any discussion about the CPU instructions in the light of the results does not make much sense to me.
Well, check the video.
The point is: the same game on newer GPU after a couple of years and FX8350 is faster gaming CPU. No other changes. The only changed factor is the GPU.
The new games multi-threading is an icing on the cake that emphasizes the point that 8C and 4C CPU testing at low...
This tells me that you do not understand the FX8350 and i5-2500 example.
It was shown in the video that when GPUs gained power FX8350 became a better gaming CPU.
Why? Because the GPUs were gaining power also through the addition of the multi-threading.
This is the reason why comparing gaming of...
I lost multi-monitor support with this driver.
I have for monitors (1xHDMI, 3xDisplayPort) on my MSI Gaming 1080.
Now only two monitors work and the driver is crashing.
Not happy at the moment.
It happened in one game it can happen in many future games.
RX480 has better designed for DX12 and Vulkan.
Just go and read the thread. All the points why it might be are discussed over there.
https://www.computerbase.de/2016-07/doom-vulkan-benchmarks-amd-nvidia/#diagramm-doom-mit-vulkan-2560-1440
1070 - 88
RX480 - 79
RX480 is just 10% behind 1070. Where 1060 is going to end up?
I have no idea if somebody imagined RX480 to get that close to 1070 a couple of weeks ago.
When...
It appears you are overreacting here.
We do not know how AIB cards will perform yet. They might be better than 390X and getting close to 980Ti in DX12 games. The time will tell.
RX480 is almost 10% faster than 980 in DX12!
Custom 480's will be even more.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/72889-radeon-rx480-8gb-performance-review-24.html
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.