True that. I'm sure we can all, at least this one time, forgive the software guys at AMD for not recognizing that there are idiots out there who "hot swap" their gpus.
I think that if nvidias' goal in this was to get more focus on RT. Job done.
It can't be pleasant for them there watching their $1500 behemoth being bested and matched in raster performance at 1440p and below by something less than half it's price. They have to detract from that - or at least...
Poor old Wizzard has no luck with AMD has he? Everything from getting the slowest ryzens on the planet to the slowest radeons for review, he also has to deal with a piece of software(NOT DRIVERS) that won't disable itself when he doesn't bother to uninstall hardware properly. Hard luck...
Triple digit fps in those titles shown, do you have anything that is borderline unplayable because of said dx11 driver woes? I'm sure if anything new comes out dx11, the performance will be were it needs to be.
AMD were not expecting to sell too many of these to begin with because they genuinely thought nvidia would have come out a bit better than they did. Nvidia themselves would have known the competition was coming much stronger than before. I'm guessing both IHVs didn't commit as many wafers to...
Pretty sure these 6800s are faulty/defective die that don't make the cut as XTs or 6900s. I seriously doubt they're cutting fully functional die to get these and IF they are, it goes to explain the $50 too high price tag.
What chance that there's some built in redundancy here, that this is actually an 88 or 96 CU chip? Something to meet the Ti card that nvidia will surely drop in the coming months.
What's more likely, a defective chunk of memory controller or a defective cache? Maybe the additional costs of going cache route are offset by better yields? Either way, I'm pretty sure they ran the numbers, this change would have have been in the works long enough for them to know if it's...
Everyone is an expert when it comes to what AMD should or should not do....
But whatever! They simply cannot continue bankrolling you if they are to remain competitive and grow, especially where they offer the superior product.
There will always be some "feature", some "support" that AMD "needs" to add so we will never get to that point.
What we can do is discuss the merits of said features and support to stop crap being passed as gold or vice versa.
There's already enough IQ cheating for the sake of performance. The last thing the end user or consumer should be championing as a "feature", is more IQ compromising algorithms. Nvidia and AMD can, just not the consumer. I't's like self-harming.
Reducing the level of detail on parts of the frame is hardly a "feature" to crow about having, it's compromising your IQ for crying out loud. You also list Gsync as a feature deficit for the AMD card!?!. Really? Please expand on the etc, I would really love to know what makes the price premium...
Doesn't the fact that nvidia have software scheduling vs Amd's hardware sheduling mean that they cannot go any faster than they already do in the best case scenerio? They claim to have had this feature or something similar for yonks.
So no mention of the anti lag or image fidelity features which in my opine are infinitely much better features than DLSS(only to be seen on FF demo??), RT which is a waste this generation. Still the usual suspects will continue harping on about "less features" :rolleyes:
This assumes that everyone who wanted the Camry, at that price for that performance, last year, went and got the Camry. Big assumption.
How about someone who wants that level of performance now, coming from say 1060/580?? Why wouldn't they want the "Hyundai"?
Go to control panel, under hardware and sound you'll find the realtek audio manager. If your problem is anything like what I used to get, click on the spanner in audio manager and disable jack detection and test your audio.
Yes of course, AMD is to totally blame for the $2500 Titan RTX, that comes to you from the company that was asking $650 for their highend card card in 2008.....:rolleyes:
Tflops #s have never been representantive of gaming performance and no, they don't need to get off GCN. The gaming industry just needs to get off dated APIs
Nvidia's naming each and every tweak of their architecture like some completely new and radically different thing, has clouded a lot of ppl's view on gpus.
They did the whole undercutting Nv thing and it didn't work.Nv just adjust their pricing and the masses flock there. The 290X was 2% faster(uber mode, AT review) than the OG Titan, AMD priced it at $100 cheaper than the $650 gtx780. Nv dropped the 780 price to match 290X pricing and they stuck...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.