My home was struck by lightning Memorial day. Blew out just about all of my network hardware (routers, switches and wireless ap's). I have take the opportunity to upgrade the routers and switches (hey only time I could justify it to the my boss (wife)).
But I need to guidance on what type...
Generally its a read operation. But you might have writes if there is a join statement creating temporary work tables. Posting the sql query would help in further explaining what operations are being done.
Jim
When are you going to realize we do not have a free market economy, nobody does. With that as a starting point. Government can do what it pleases to force employers to pay a minimum wage. They can either tax the employers, fined the employers or make it so hard for them to operate that they...
There is no guarantee that these roving or covert officers would deter these nutcases. In fact its probably equivalent to no officer being present. The deterrence effect is a officer armed and present at the school/library/mall.... Get the problem. We do not have enough trained officers to...
Problem with that logic, is you can catch it multiple times in a season, because it mutates and your immunity does not provide protection then. Same logic applies to the vaccine. Its a crap shoot if they guess right, and that is why the shot is a cocktail of various flu viruses, they hope one...
sorry if this has been previously posted, but here it is for everyone again.
Homeland Security urges computer users to disable Java
Link to article in Chicago Tribune...
Nice read on the silliness of the anti gun control group argument against gun control.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-katz-md/gun-control_b_2449628.html
Try governing by council.. hell take a look at congress there is your council type arrangement.
We have a system of checks and balances. If one branch is going to abrogate their duties, then something has to fill the vacuum. The age of the imperial presidency has been going on for awhile...
here is a really good paper on the current gun laws, issues and research.
http://www.jhsph.edu/research/centers-and-institutes/johns-hopkins-center-for-gun-policy-and-research/publications/WhitePaper102512_CGPR.pdf
Please point to a meanful study that supports your theory I bolded. Because gun violence is a broad across the board, equal socio-economic problem. Not all of it, maybe a slight majority of it is economic related, but I have not seen anything to support that argument lately.
The real question, who decides someone is mentally fit to purchase or own a gun? The government? Aren't they the ones trying to take the guns away?
So you are back to the same issue. If mental health test is a criteria, who decides the criteria.
So what if he issues an EO directing the ATF to enforce a new policy that requires every bullet to be serialized, recorded and chipped? Is that beyond his authority? If so please point to the exact law that would prevent that? For that matter if he directed the ATF to begin drafting new...
http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm
Based upon the 3rd quarter Dollar GDP it was around $15,811.0 billion (about 15.8T) using the growth estimates for the 4th quarter, our GDP should top about 21T. So basic math
Debt/GDP -->> 16T/21T = 76%.
typical government crap and the law of unintended consequences. I really wonder is a pro gun congressman/senator snuck in that subsection in section 2716, and a anti gun congressman/senator saw it and change the follow on section to undo it or limited it. Would not surprise me.
Another little tidbit.. the membership really isn't soaring. By their own numbers the NRA in Feb 2012 had 4.3 million members. If your numbers are correct, then they are pretty much unchanged.
http://www.statisticbrain.com/national-rifle-association-nra-statistics/
What one section giveth, the next taketh away. Section 2717 basically says only the Sec. of HHS can not collect the data, it does not mention DoD, Attorney General or any other government agency.
Well you have to understand the institutional insanity inherent in American society. We are a country of 100 different view points held together by a common fear of everyone else outside our homes. Go to any townhall meeting and watch the people who attend. They all come with their minds made...
You really don't have a clue. And yes "when people conceal carry there are gun fights and violence".
http://www.vpc.org/ccwkillers.htm
Do they have an agenda, yes.. But facts are facts regardless of whether you agree with them or not. Again schools/churches and other public places are...
There is already enough campus violence, why allow it to escalate to shootings? People should be secure in knowing that their fellow students are not packing guns in class. I remember in my college days (seems so long ago), students getting upset over a grade and taking their books and...
Not really, they have in the past banned certain types of ammo and could again restrict or ban the ammo. An in restricting the supply it is completely within the gov't rights. This approach does not require Congressional approval either as the ATF has the power to do so. So if congress were...
I think we are missing a key point here. While the 2nd amendment preserves the right to keep and bear arms, it does not restrict the government from restricting the sales/trade/transfer of ammuntion and that is the key to how the gov't could effectively regulate guns. So if you can not...
Look posing really far reaching hypothetical scenerios is not going to strengthen any argument for not changing the laws to restrict assault weapons or large capacity magazines. That boat sailed on December 14, 2012, when that nut job kill 20 kids.
Grow up, if you are actively plotting to murder US citizens, you are going to sooner or later pay the piper. If he an active member of a terrorist organization, and he was, then he is a target.
What is interesting is how broad the 2001 Authorization for military action against Terrorists...
38 years in Florida, been thru more hurricanes, tropical storms and tornadoes then most will ever face in a life time. And never even came close to need a assault weapon, even in Liberty City (probably the worst area in Miami) or Homestead in 1992. Look nobody is facing 4+ attackers unless they...
Again it has done it, and it has precedence. That ways very heavy with the courts, unless there is a grievous injustice done and I think that would be very heavy load to lift for the NRA or any group challenging such a ban.
The point is, that the gov't did remove a class of weapons from the general public, and we still have guns. Nothing stops the gov't from doing that again, either by a new law, or and EO expanding the existing National Firearms Act. I think Obama would prefer the approach of a law changing or...
And that is understandable. Now the argument has been made that once we ban one weapon, its a short walk to gov't confiscation of all arms. I think that is a really straw man argument. When the gov't in the 1930's restricted fully automatic weapons (partly because of the mob killings (Al...
No its not, the court have made it clear that the government can choose to regulate the access to certain weapons if it deems so in the name of public safety. The 1990's assault weapons ban is one example. If Congress had chosen it could of made that permanent but did not. Challenges to that...
The constitution does not prevent the government from restricting weapons, no where does it guarantee that an individual has a right to a particular weapon. The government in the past has restricted access and possession of assault weapons (1990's for example) and fully automatic weapons.
If the govt argues the public safety issue as a reason the Supreme court has often deferred to the Executive Branch when it concerns matters of public safety and policy. More than likely the Supreme Court would be a few years out before they even hear the case, assuming they would even take it...
If the President chooses to use an EO to ban SAW's and large capacity magazines he could just expand the existing National Firearms Act of 1934. This law was challenged and upheld by a very conservative Supreme Court in 1939.
So that is your answer? Insult a poster asking a legitimate question. Please point to one single example of a mass shooting being stop by an arm civilian? Hell even Combine had two officers and they failed to stop the massacre.
Simple fact is as long as we have nuts that can get guns via...
Reauthorization of the Defense Budget... Every president does it.
Introduced in the Bush Administration. Why no cries for impeachment then?
Again, I will give you that one, but lets face it Awlaki was a piece of sh!t.
Warrantless eavesdropping-...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.