We are in a sad state indeed if, indeed, headline changing (along with the intent derived from it) is standard. To that end, why do we now accept "interpretations" as "news"? Oh, yeah - sensationalism.
Shoddy management, IMHO.
Another post said, “I am no fan of President Obama, but to show you how dishonest the phony Washington Post is, they wrote, ‘Donald Trump suggests President Obama was involved with Orlando shooting’ as their headline. Sad!”
Trump was referring to an article that posted...
You are correct. I am trusting that this reporter has done their homework, because I am gainfully employed in another field.
What has collapsed? I am explaining to you an issue that was presented in the article. I do not know her personal stance regarding the selling of these parts, but I...
This was linked from the Washington Post article: link
Ah - so anybody that has ever met james O'Keefe is now "linked" and is, of course, a "liar". I guess this is what the talking points are to smear this - I noticed that "absolutely unbiased ;)" Snopes is already in that corner.
She also discusses altering the procedure in order to particularly harvest organs. Federal regulations also prohibit anyone from altering the timing or method of an abortion for the sole purpose of later using the tissue in research.
Messengers should wear bulletproof vests.
*SIGH*
As expected, you completely missed the point - that courts *had to* determine the intent of the law, because it was not spelled out properly.
I guess that's what happens when you get industries to write your laws instead of the people that are elected to do so.
You would think that with the thousands upon thousands of pages of the law and associated regulations, there would be zero leeway as to the actual intent. Isn't Congress elected to pass laws, not intents of laws?
It's been a while since I've bought a video card. I have a new Mini-ITX build that is currently running off onboard Intel graphics. Specs:
- GIGABYTE GA-H97N-WiFi
- i5-4690K
- 16GB RAM
- XFX P1-650X-XXB9 650W PSU
- Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced case
I will be running three...
Sounds like you live in a pretty rough neighborhood. You could probably score some cocaine, too, and last I heard it's still illegal. So, what's your point?
..and? That still makes nothing he said false, does it?
Why did they present the "binders of women" to Romney's opponent, considering their own statement said they didn't start compiling them until after the election?
Except, according to this link posted above: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/wp/2012/10/17/massgap-responds-to-mitt-romney-on-women-appointees/
the binders weren't handed over on election day - they didn't even start to collect names of women that might be interested until...
Oh - so I guess Obama was being honest when he said these deaths were merely "not optimal"? What would it have taken for that "not optimal" to become a "failure"?
Oh - calling the deaths of four Americans (in an "act of terror" - "not act of terror" - "act of terror") merely "not optimal" doesn't have any substance?
Wolf, indeed.
Oh - I get it. If it's someone the left doesn't approve of, it's a "cheap trick". If it's someone the left *does* approve of, it's obviously "faux outrage".
:rolleyes:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.