Search results

C
Kingston Hyper X or Mushkin?

The geil 3500 ultra plat is currently what i have, but i am selling it soon so im buying some better ram. The reason is because my ram is more then likely my bottleneck of my overclock. I just got a bad set of sticks that wont do good in overclocking, others have the same ram as me and got...
- calfpheen
- Post #11
- Aug 18, 2003
- Forum: CPUs and Overclocking
C
Kingston Hyper X or Mushkin?

well, the 3500 is alot more expensive then the mushkin 3200. thats the reason i wanted to ask about mushkin, cause isnt mushkin better ram them kingston?
- calfpheen
- Post #3
- Aug 18, 2003
- Forum: CPUs and Overclocking
C
Kingston Hyper X or Mushkin?

Just wondering, im going to buy some memory, but im limited on money. Im thinking of either getting Kingston Hyper X 3500 512mb, or a stick of Mushkin 512 3200 512mb. Which one is a better choice for a IS7-E / 2.6c Setup? I'm wanting to get the best one for overclocking. Thanks in advance.
- calfpheen
- Thread
- Aug 18, 2003
- Replies: 12
- Forum: CPUs and Overclocking
C
**2.6C / IC7-G @ 3.5GHz**

i cant even get 250fsb with my 2.6c/is7/geil 3500 plat great oc man.. but that makes me pissed that i cant even do 3.2ghz. :(
- calfpheen
- Post #17
- Aug 16, 2003
- Forum: CPUs and Overclocking
C
Possibly the Best Mod !

that makes me want to join the military... thats awesome.
- calfpheen
- Post #18
- Aug 15, 2003
- Forum: Cases & Cooling
C
Best way to destroy a hard drive?

FIRE! :D
- calfpheen
- Post #66
- Aug 15, 2003
- Forum: Computer Building
C
Window 2003 - not a Gaming OS? - NO ATI Driver - No 3D?

im running win2k3 server right now as a regular os.. well i was, but i just formatted to winxp. worked perfectly fine for me, performed pretty good too. i have a nvidia card though.
- calfpheen
- Post #3
- Aug 15, 2003
- Forum: Operating Systems
C
You know it's time to call overclockers Anonymous when....

hehe, stock 3fsb, i bet u could hit 9 on air... 12 easily with water cooling.
- calfpheen
- Post #14
- Aug 15, 2003
- Forum: CPUs and Overclocking
C
Which to overclock? 2.4c or 2500+ ?

then your games will run 15% slower, defeats the purpose of upgrading eh? intel > amd .
- calfpheen
- Post #26
- Aug 14, 2003
- Forum: CPUs and Overclocking
C
INTEL - Synchronous is not important

i need money, and a new vid card, this gf4 mx 440 is killing me.
- calfpheen
- Post #54
- Aug 14, 2003
- Forum: CPUs and Overclocking
C
INTEL - Synchronous is not important

btw stevejst, im same guy as batmang. somehow i lost my info for that account..... but yeah. i think im gonna invest in some 4000ddr later on. i didnt get as lucky as you did, but i wish i had.
- calfpheen
- Post #50
- Aug 14, 2003
- Forum: CPUs and Overclocking
C
INTEL - Synchronous is not important

forgot to mention this... if i could run a higher fsb at stock vcore, or at least something under 1.6v, i would. but i cant, so i figured, why hurt my cpu when i can get same fps leaving it at stock vcore. but yeah, id still use a non-sync setup if i could, cause better performance is given...
- calfpheen
- Post #48
- Aug 14, 2003
- Forum: CPUs and Overclocking
C
INTEL - Synchronous is not important

well, i have a good example for you guys.... i had my 2.6c @ 3.11ghz, 239 fsb, 5:4 ratio, ram is 3500 was running at 191mhz. Got about 340-350 fps in quake 3 benchmarks. last night, i didnt want to push my vcore like i had been, so i tried some 1:1 ratio benchmarking. im running at 2.91ghz right...
- calfpheen
- Post #46
- Aug 14, 2003
- Forum: CPUs and Overclocking
C
What sound does your avatar make?

he doesnt make a sound, but this explains his facial expression... " I'm HIGH AS FvCK! "
- calfpheen
- Post #86
- Aug 13, 2003
- Forum: OT Discussion Club

RESOURCES

Top Bottom