Look, Vic, its fine. You clearly need to "win" this more than I do. You'll simply continue to take everything someone says to you and misinterpret it in whatever method possible so you can throw out fancy little fallacy lines.
So please, continue. I'm going to let you "win", because clearly...
Look how the public property was handled during the shutodwn, that gives you an idea as to how most people want private property handled. Thats not at all what libertarians want. They simply want their rights protected, they dont want the government standing gaurd on the entrance to their...
If you spent as much time researching political leanings as you did trying to learn fancy Fallacy words you might actually know what you are talking about. Alas, all you have is fancy talking points by throwing out your "Fallacies for Dummies" talking points.
Sorry for you.
Its a double edged sword. I love the idea of unions but I am firmly in the anti-union camp. As long a unions are favored under the law I will be anti-union.
Having said that, its important to keep in mind theres a distinct difference between a labor union and a trade union. As much as I hate...
Well, to be fair the definition tends to be somewhat abstract, as even self proclaimed libertarians probably couldnt agree 100% on what a libertarian believes. None the less it generally focuses on smaller government, freedoms, and individual rights.
Trust me, libertarians are even less interested in having the government protect PRIVATE property.
Lets go full circle, thats what self defense laws are for. Libertarians do NOT want the government having armed soldiers or police run around with guns to protect private property. In fact...
Its scary how for so long "We the people" simply meant individuals, but in the last 50 years or so so many people have decided "We the people" means a socialist government created to take money from the haves to give to the people who are the dregs of society.
Funny how you can change the...
sorry, libertarian ideals are not at all founded on the idea that government should protect property. Thats exactly the opposite in fact, many conservatives asked why public lands were closed during the government shutdown. Of course the Democrats thought that since the government wasnt around...
Courts have already ruled the police are not required to answer calls for help. So your argument has already fallen right flat on its ass. Now throw int he concepts of neighborhood watches and self defense laws and the idea the governments job is to protect property is just laughable.
So you really believe if we cancel welfare Walmart will increase its wages? Do you REALLY believe that, or are you just being an idiot? NO ONE who studies economics, NO ONE who uses logic and facts to form an opinion will tell you that companies will give low skilled workers a raise if we cancel...
The problem there is for many centuries one didnt need the States approval to open a business. The entire concept of "business license" simply didnt exist. More over the idea of trade existed well before the idea of an organized state. Even animals exhibit the concept of trade and certainly...
But thats not what is happening. In fact thats not even logic, thats just made up lies to try to garner emotional responses.
I promise you, in writing, Walmart will not raise its wages if you stop giving people welfare. I promise it. Walmart doesnt base its wages off what welfare pays. I...
So by your logic if we suspended social programs employers would give everyone a raise? Of course not. The social programs have no bearing whatsoever on what an employer chooses to pay its employees. Now, if the employer tells employees how to take advantage of social programs then thats their...
Mike Rowe would strongly disagree with you. in fact he would (righlty) state there are millions of jobs simply waiting for someone to want to fill them. Of course it requires a bit of hard work, requires getting a bit dirty, so of course the special snowflakes of this generation have no desire...
Yes, business exists for the sake of the owners that I will agree with. However they certainly dont need the government to protect them. Theres plenty of businesses that exist in countries with laughable levels of government (Look to Africa). The business will often times simply take the matter...
Theres this little thing called "Cost of goods sold". At some point, even while still profitable, it simply isnt worth the risk to stay in business.
Now to some extent we already do this. As much as people love to piss and moan and cry about farm subsidies trust me, they would piss and moan...
Thats more a problem for the Democrats who seem to think they can fix any problem with just "a bit more legislation". The fact is its quite the opposite. You see Democrats tend to view the economy as something which fundamentally would no work without interference. As if its a broken idea which...
We dont "allow" business to exist. Did Compaq ask your permission to form? Did Intel decide to start its entire business for you? Of course not. Did the local hardware store get your permission to buy a building and stock it?
The idea business exists for the sake of citizens is some...
Business doesnt exist for the sake of citizens, are you insane? Is it really your opinion businesses are created for no other reason than to give some poor schmuck a job??
Moonbeam, as usual, thinks "job" means something high paying, easy and with little responsibility or hard work. So of course there isnt enough jobs for everyone.
Now if we use the a more practical definition of "job", where you might have to stand, you might have long hours, you might have...
So? Its neither the governments job nor the employers job to take care of someone. If this person is so unhappy with their minimum wage job maybe they should go back to being a doctor or lawyer and stop accepting minimum wage?
Because those items are already taxed? Because working people are already taxed to a ridiculous amount? Because its fucking stupid to think every solution is "raise taxes!"?
So you provide an example of specifically targeting by race, and then you state it isnt a hate crime.
You are doing a bang up job here buddy. Want to try again?
I do understand it has to be provable, but I think this shows why the entire idea behind a "hate crime" is pretty silly to begin...
Have to admit, theres a bit of humor in the fact that a state founded on the idea that marriage isnt between one man and one woman has to have a court tell them marriage isnt defined as being one man one woman. Odd that.
Its funny, I think most people would say they dont think big government is a good idea...but if you ask them about the government providing services, suddenly big government is a fantastic idea.
I guess they dont realize the connection between free shit from Uncle Sugar and Big Government.
You are simply repeating questions I've already answered.
The free market was never intended to "take care of" everyone. You are trying to say that every single person should be able to walk into the hospital and be treated, and since the free market didnt allow for that then it failed. The...
Its interesting to see emotions applied to accounting and numbers. I suppose your next hat trick will be to say the Federal budget should be created base on feelgood rather than numbers right? Its "feels good" to spend money on the poor so lets spend more. It "feels good" to end money overseas...
So you dont even know about instances of hate crimes towards whites, and yet you feel the need to act as an authority on the subject? Interesting that.
But lets talk about society favoring one race over another. Shall we discuss fire fighter hiring practices where minorities are given lower...
Which undermines everything the country was founded on. Work hard, move up, enjoy a higher standard of living. Your entire argument focuses on if someone doesnt want to pay higher taxes they shouldnt work hard, rather than focusing on the fact its horribly unfair to tell someone who has worked...
Wait, you think *I* am overcomplicating the word tax? I've just soundly proven, beyond any shadow of a doubt, you are trying to ignore the fact the tax system truly is a reward to a good number of people in this country and you simply ignore that and blindly move on, and then call ME the "head...
http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html
Blacks are 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites then vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit a robbery.
If you assume the population is roughly 10% black (A bit low but makes for easy "back of napkin"...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.