How many years haven't you advocated AMD products that the next one is the saviour? How many sites and forums dont you post the same nonsense to? Yet Nvidia and Intel shares keeps going UP.
And yes, I can guarantee you OEMs and cloud vendors knows exactly how Naples performs. And its regarded...
Same BS as always isn't it. Never an AMD product that wont sell like hotcakes according to you. So now the forever #waitforamd game continues.
How many years haven't you advocated this crap?
And good luck with your Naples fairytale dreams. Unlike desktop its not so easy for AMD to lie about...
https://www.servethehome.com/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-linux-benchmarks/
2670v1 is a SB 8C/16T 2.6Ghz base, 3.3Ghz turbo.
Stop with the benchmarks that are not real. That 2670 is a DUAL setup with 32 threads. You make it look bad with every post.
Markfw
Anandtech Moderator
When reviews first comes when sales start, you know it stinks.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Ryzen-7-1800X-CPU-265804/Tests/Test-Review-1222033/
http://www.sweclockers.com/test/23426-amd-ryzen-7-1800x-och-7-1700x/
Trolling is not allowed
Markfw
Anandtech Moderator
OC wall seems to be 4-4.1Ghz depending on chip. Another overclockers dream. And when you cant be creative with the bigger L2 you are down to SB IPC.
http://www.legitreviews.com/amd-ryzen-7-1800x-1700x-and-1700-processor-review_191753/
Trolling and baiting are not allowed
Markfw
Anandtech...
Core performance matters too. But so does cache size and memory speed. Then you can act like it something else.
The Broadwell-E in the test not only have twice the memory bandwidth over the 7700K because they all used 2400Mhz. They also got 15, 20 and 25MB caches.
And its not news that...
They decided to nerf the 2500K with 1333Mhz memory while giving the FX 1866Mhz memory.
21GB/sec on SB, 30GB/sec on FX.
"So unterstützt Sandy Bridge zum Beispiel maximal DDR3-1.333 und nur diese Geschwindigkeit wurde auch genutzt."
The EDRAM on the 5775C is a large L4 cache. And its linked because its a classic example when the bottleneck is elsewhere than core performance. Its not that hard to understand is it?
You are going to be disappointed if you think its due to more cores and not due to 4Ghz, huge L3 and quad channel memory.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/multi-core-cpu-scaling-directx-11,4768.html
Same reason why a 5775C can match a 6700K.
The thread died there. Did you even think it through?
The CPUs are validated, warrantied and so on for 100C. Then it doesn't matter if someone think it should be 10C or 50C. They could also just do like AMD and report it in some bogus value.
Wrong, the TIM is quite good. The issue is the gap...
You are right it cant be that low. I dont even think transistors on 14LPP is even capable of switching at any speed at that voltage. Its more around 1-1.2V.
So Skylake IPC already with CPU-Z bench. Still time to pass it before release. Choo choo!
Then we can all wonder why we keep being shown small cache loop benches.
One 95W series of chips needing sub 60C Tcase to remain within TDP. The other series of 95W chips can use above 70C Tcase and still stay within TDP. These 2 series of chips are clearly not identical.
The cooler can handle way more than 125W. Its 150W capable at least and I would think 175W too. The reason why is in the extreme low Tcase rating for the X chips. I cant remember seeing one below 60C Tcase before. You are right tho, they would be 125W TDP chips without very good cooling. Will be...
Sure they do. Its about growth factors. Its a reshuffle like always. Desktop lost to mobile previously as well.
The ARM server dreams is nothing but a pipedream. Company after company tries, company after company abandons it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.