Maxwell, at least the GM107 chip, appears to use very little power. Since an OCed version is still ≤ 75 W I suspect a stock clock version could be considerably below 75 W.
From UK Gaming Computers: "Nvidia GTX 750 & 750 Ti Benchmarks."
OC to non-OC isn't the fairest comparison, so I'd really like to know what the stock clocks are.
Since SA/Videocardz appears to be saying the GM107 is a 28 nm midrange chip, I suspect that the 780 is likely to have a performance lead over any GM107 parts.
Even if the GM204 is 28 nm (which Videocardz doesn't think is the case), I can see it being higher performing than the 780.
Wasn't that originally from Videocardz? I'm half expecting the 780 Ti "black edition" to show up as a "880," that is, if it's even real in the first place.
Oh, I wasn't aware it was delayed so much. So would you say it's likely there will be another year of 28 nm in late 2014 through a significant chunk of 2015?
From VR-Zone: "Intel's Xeon Phi Knights series expands in 2015" contains slides that I'm assuming are from Intel and some additional information.
A lot of the information was already seen in the heise online report, but some info that's new to me is as follows:
≤ 3x single-threaded...
Perhaps Slomo4shO is using the base clock instead of the effective clock.
GTX 285: 1242 MHz (2484 Mbps).
HD 4890: 975 MHz (3900 Mbps).
HD 6950: 1250 MHz (5000 Mbps).
And 3DCenter forum before that.
According to the "leak," the FinFETs appear to be for the refresh Maxwells, and if the first line of 20 nm Maxwells comes in late 2014 or so then it would not be surprising for the refresh to come in late 2015 or even 2016.
The Quadro K6000 shows that they are capable of, whether we'll see that level of specs in the Tesla/GeForce line is another question.
There have been rumors of a future Tesla "K30," my guess is that a full GK110 for the desktop won't come before a K30. If the Maxwell on 28 nm rumors are true...
I've been fairly pessimistic about specs/performance for Hawaii after the massive Cayman hype. But if Hawaii is as good as the recent leaks claim, then that's massively refreshing. It would also explain why some recent (and at least one older) leak(s) seem to claim that the upcoming AMD lineup...
The die size range gives us reality to some supposed leaks / insider info claiming a ≥ 470 mm^2 die (unless AMD has for some reason more than one upcoming ≥ 400 mm^2 chip).
I have a 9400M in my MacBook Pro (1440x900). I prefer keeping the native resolution over stuff like AA if I have to make a choice, so for most of my games I turn down the video settings almost all the way. But for some games I end up lowering the resolution (1152x720 and 800x600) as well as the...
Performance projections? Maxwell could be on 28 nm first, later 20 nm. The "big" Maxwell is likely to come out on 20 nm, which would be needed give it the 2x DP FLOPS over "big" Kepler that their roadmap says. (Or are you talking about another type of projection?)
Apple has not used 28 nm (or 40...
I haven't bought a graphics chip since 2009 (when I got my MBP) unless I include the G98 keychain I got last year. So clearly, the entire GPU market has been failing for years!
I'm not entirely sure about the Tesla part, the 780 is rumored to have 12 SMXs so a lot of 780 chips may be chips with 3 defective SMXs, which means they wouldn't have been used as K20 or K20X anyway (unless there is a lower-end Tesla coming out later). However sub-13 SMX GK110s could be used in...
The 780's rumored specs are 88% of the (non-Boost) FLOPS and 100% of the bandwidth of the Titan, so I'd expect it to be ~10% (maybe a bit less) below the Titan (average), which would be ~20% above the 7970 GE (on average). I wouldn't be surprised if the 7970 GE matched or beat the 780 in a few...
Since it was an NVIDIA slide, they could (using Titan and 10%-50% as an example) pick games and settings to get numbers on the higher half of that range, to give an apparent 30%-50% increase ("40% average").
It may be normal but that doesn't make the implication true. Even if the benchmark %...
If the 25%-50% numbers are referring to the range of benchmark numbers in the performance slide, then an average of 37.5% does not follow from the information given (for example, 9 at 25% and 1 at 50% would give an average of 27.5%). Plus there's the Tomb Raider benchmark which it's "only" 20%...
Fudzilla has a corresponding report on the GTX 770.
1046 MHz base, 1085 MHz boost
2/4 GB
7 Gbps memory
230 W TDP
I'm quite surprised at the TDP… it seems quite high.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.