Claim that I don't use facts, keep ignoring economics, hate big oil, live in liberal paradise fantasy land where corporations are brought to social justice for the common man.
I'm done. You will keep cheering on how evil oil companies will ruin this nation. I will keep investing in them, make some money, fill up my car with gas, look at all the cars on the road, think about how oil makes all those things run and then smile.
I don't know why your striking. That is exactly what I said.
You have zero comprehension skills.
Decreased uncertainty(means less speculation) + lower transportation costs= lower cost of oil.
Price stabilization(midwest, cheaper canadian oil and decoupling from international brent)...
China should just flood in there from the ground with USA air and naval support. The North Koreans wouldn't know what hit them.
New beginning for the pacific region without the crazy uncle that looks at the kids funny and asks for money.
Oil. We need it. We need to sell it to make money. Money good. Keystone improves pipeline infrastructure. New pipeline, less maintenance. Drives costs down to get oil to refineries. Less cost to refineries, less cost gets moved down. Jobs for building pipeline. Pipeliners eat, buy clothes, etc...
Your citing NY times who constantly cheers for the left? Lol. And I love the alarmarist info-graphic trying to make it look like "OIL IS EVERYWHERE?! OMGWTFBBQ?!" Did I say spills did not occur? No. Considering the fact that there aren't that many major spills,which if you look at the graphic...
You really aren't that smart are you?
A pipeline is cheaper than paying companies to move crude to refineries through truck, ship and train. if it wasn't they wouldn't be building them because that's how you run a business, you try to cut costs to increase profits and gain an edge in the...
http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/uncertainty/pdf/dec12_uncertainty.pdf
A)There is a transportation bottle neck. The EIA says it itself. By relieving some of those pressures you will see prices go down as more is getting to refineries and the expansions in Houston are completed(not listed but...
This is why I'm for lessening the requirements on citizenship, but also you have to cut the entitlements or it is just going to increase the costs per each one that becomes a citizen.
And under our greatest times of growth were when it was mixed the least. It shouldn't be preferred because costs are finally catching up to us due to over spending in general because of wars and entitlements. There are some things that I agree that are necessary to government which they should...
Umm, no. Republicans are pretty dumb in regards to abortion, religion and gays.
Your lack of knowledge about guns proves that Democrats are just as guilty of ignorance.
And both parties are horrible at budgeting and spending our money.
Ah, got it. Have capitalistic economies do the work and through socialist parasitism redistribute under fairness and best for society. Genius.
How can you say capitalism is best system then turn around and say that it is the worst for healthcare?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk
I'll tell you how it works. Right now oil sands are now being transported to refineries by truck, ship and train. This adds to the costs. It is cheaper in the long run to have the initial investment of building a pipeline to reduce transportation costs to...
History calls those men the greatest who have ennobled themselves by working for the common good; experience acclaims as happiest the man who has made the greatest number of people happy.
Marx, Letter to His Father (1837)
You plan for the worst and nothing will get done because there is risk in everything.
Pipelines have the least impact on daily life considering how many there are operating RIGHT NOW. They are also drive down the cost of oil and hate to tell you, but this country runs on oil and will for a...
Every cost is now a cost to the US government and everyone in turn.
The purpose of American human society is to provide an environment for people to prosper, not a "best possible life, for the greatest number of people." I believe those are words straight out of Marx right?
Well, they do die sooner, that's good for universal health care. I was just saying while their alive their costs are much higher than other people. So the problem is increasing use of long term care. Do you think we should provide it and why?
It isn't that more efficient and as a program costs the government. If we didn't do medicare in the first place, than efficiency really doesn't matter.
UHC also has the pitfalls that I said earlier.
They don't die sooner because of LTC. Insulin, heart drugs, constant visits to the doctor for management, all increase costs.
And your using OECD analysis? The organization which used to be about free markets and now has shifted toward pushing progressive policy? Nah, they wouldn't have any...
I'm saying it is a flawed system, doctors are going away from it and doing private only now.
Also how every nation is having their own problems with it in terms of wait times, rationing of care, and they have less comorbidities of obesity, hypertension and diabetes than Americans have.
Umm..no BS.
I payed $30 for the office visit for the cash only doctor. My insurance allowed $75 for an office visit. If I paid more monthly for the higher tier than I could get the $30 co pay, but in the course of the year it would cost me more since I am relatively healthy and don't need it.
I don't have crappy insurance, it is there in case of drastic emergency and I don't want to pay monthly a higher rate for the other one where office visits would be lower. At least I pay for health insurance, unlike some who see it is other people's perrogative to pay for them.
Paying cash...
No I'm not one of those people considering not every doctor is hungry and needs his house repainted.
Money seems like a perfectly sound way of exchange of services.
The government system is not more efficient, I don't know why you say it is. They say medicare admin costs are 2%. Well of course its going to say it is 2% when they are putting out billions in dollars in procedures that number is gonna look small. But at the same time, it is on par with private...
I have insurance. It was a small problem, I have a deductible to meet, and he charged me less than what I would pay for an office visit. So how am I a fool exactly?
I guess it would.
I'm not advocating that at all. I'm advocating a return to people being responsible for themselves without having the socialized risk of us paying for it all.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.