The Ahmaud Arbery case is basically a case of vigilantism. That is members of a neighborhood watch trying to catch who they believed was the criminal Ahmaud Arbery. They did so incorrectly and as such were found guilty. That being said, citizen arrest laws are English common laws that have been...
Did you watch the trial or even know the evidence of the KR case? There was no vigilantism at all. Kyle was one of HUNDREDS carrying guns for protection that night. Many were also protestors doing so legally. It was the 5th night where previous nights had seen quite a few buildings burned down...
I didn't lie about anything dickhead. Which you seem to do incessantly. Also, unlike you or anyone else on this forum, I have been 100% right on every legal case I've talked about. I also cite actual practicing attorneys and even link their info as well when I use them. Most around here want to...
Devin is to legal analysis as CNN is to news. If the subject doesn't have anything political to it, then he gets it right. The moment a subject has a political slant he takes a hard stance to go through as many mental gymnastic convolutions as possible to make his analysis fit his narrative.
Legal Schmeagol is a dunce. He literally upright lies about the law several times in that video. Devin hasn't ever practiced law. Don't know why anyone watches him. Want to watch what some real practicing criminal attorneys have to say about that video?
Devin just panders to a specific low...
Yah, that is one that I didn't think was proven at all. Prosecution basically trying to claim the mere fact he went to get a gun for the citizens arrest proves malice. I don't agree. There was nothing else the prosecution had to prove that. At a minimum I see that charge being overturned on...
WTF you talking about? I called that these two were guilty from the get go from my gut feeling but that was without all the facts of the case that we saw in court. There were circumstances which they could have been "legal" in their actions, but they instead testified that they weren't trying to...
Jesus. The Majority (I'm being generous, by not saying Everything) of what you say is gibberish. I'm not sure what you heard, but I'm 100% sure you didn't understand it enough to reinterpret it. Hence the gibberish.
Wrong. It is literally a matter of a question of law at this point when NONE of the circumstances of the items of the law are in contention. That isn't gibberish at all. I invite you to watch Rekieta Law on youtube on the coverage of this trial. It is literally said by every lawyer watching the...
The illegal weapon "charge" was never a jury charge. It was a matter of fact legal contention only. The facts of the charge were NEVER in contention by the defense. The defense stated that Kyle was 17, had possession of the weapon, and the weapon was a normal full size over the counter sold...
You don't have to take my word for it. Take the fucking JUDGE'S word for it. He is the one that tossed it. Literally watch WHY it was tossed and why is was so pissed afterwards at the prosecution for trying to keep it as a charge knowing all this time it was not a valid charge to have been brought.
Are you literally this fucking insane? Dozens upon dozens of active criminal lawyers are the ones giving their legal analysis on this case and you just want to dismiss that a random youtube video. Literally you are so fucking insane you should check yourself into a mental hospital for such a...
They literally just tossed it. You have no clue about laws and every post you make exemplifies this. Stop talking.
If you want to actually want to learn some of the law from real lawyers on this case and the other cases being discussed around here, watch Rekieta Law on youtube as they are...
When a person, regardless of race, is constantly going on to various people's properties and homes at night for months.. yah I doubt that person is welcome.
The provocation instructions are dumb as heck. Taking a drone video that has compression done on it in the first place to store it on a card that was then uploaded to a twitter feed which has more compression done on it to be used as "raw" video was bad enough. Then trying to up sample that 844p...
Illegal weapon charge is about to be tossed. Judge basically already agreeing on Friday with the defense for their instructions on that and agreed to look over more. The state is a rural state and the law was designed to allow 16+ year old minors to carry a long arm to protect their farms. That...
What I've been talking about in this thread had been about who citizen's arrest law works in GA. Which basically has turned out exactly how I described it so far according to the court finding in this case. Most of the people around here don't like the idea of citizen's arrests being a legal...
OMG the amount of people STILL in this thread that think Rittenhouse is guilty and think what Binger did yesterday was not completely unethical to the point of being disbarred... wow. Even TYT has walked back their propaganda spewing on this case finally after they "claimed" to finally watch the...
I am sure you are trying to include me in that "group" defending Dunn, but if you are then you are wrong. I said the moment Dunn got out of his car and continued to shoot at a fleeing vehicle full of people that did not make any threats to him was the moment he criminally tried to murder those...
Michael Massee was not given gun training at the time. That death prompted the whole gun training regulations that came after. Even if he was negligent (wasn't and I'll explain why below), prosecutors have discretion at charging or not. Their job is justice. Or at least that is what it is...
I didn't claim John Crawford was pointing at people. WTF you talking about? You are the one that needs to work on his reading skills. I said that he was waving it around and pointing at products on the shelves with it and NOT pointing it at anyone in a threatening manner. I also said that...
Because the LAW doesn't care about where a situation occurs like this. There is no law different for movie sets versus other places. It is based upon fact patterns. If someone hands you a gun and says it is empty and you don't check it for your, THEN YOU ARE CRIMINALLY LIABLE IF SOMETHING...
What the fuck are you talking about?
He is literally waving with his hands in the air after the shooting as he is approaching police. Even NBC says this.
Move to 3:50 in the video above. Are you actually watching the trial? Your statement above with an easy video link I just posted says...
If you are stopping a felony or attempting to stop someone who committed a felony in Georgia, then use of force is legally justified. This is also the case in most states.
WTF are you spewing still?
John Crawford Video
The whole time he in that isle the idiot has his hand on the grip of the gun waving it around animatedly while on the phone. He uses the barrel to poke at items on the shelf and swings it around in all sorts of directions. While John doesn't...
Actually first post in this thread I said I believed they were guilty.
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/trayvon-martin-all-over-again.2580306/page-2#post-40155651
But keep thinking like all the other idiots around here I said something else champ.
First off, prop guns are real guns. Prop doesn't mean FAKE, it means property. It is a piece of property to enhance the movie scene. They use an armorer on all these sets because the guns are REAL because fake guns look bad in movies. Except when using a space gun or something else silly. Then...
Wrong. You don't chase down and use deadly force on someone that is not using force against you or anyone else even if you think that they did something wrong. The prosecution in this case is basically focusing everything on Rosenbaum because without that being justified, everything else falls...
Didn't rationalize anything. Stated what the facts we knew where and the possible outcomes. Never once said they were innocent nor guilty with certainty. I said what could be the outcomes based on missing facts once presented in court. I sometimes give an opinion based on current known facts...
No. You didn't at all make a single comparative example.
John Crawford III was waving a gun around in public, poking objects in an isle and loading BB's in a gun which to a person standing away may not realize that it is a BB gun. If you have a realistic looking gun and in an environment where...
So evidence came out in court that Travis pointed his gun first. Turns out there was some additional camera footage showing an angle we, the public, hadn't seen before and the defense lawyer admits in court. So basically the McMichael's escalated the use of deadly force first. Their only prayer...
I noticed you were using fictional opinioned strawman samples that aren't worth the time or effort to address. When you start from such a false premise as what you stated, there is no point in trying to address point you are making as there would be literally no point to it. When you have an...
I am glad you don't like statements of fact. Really continues to assure me of how bad this board is. Alec was criminally negligent here along with others in this case. At this point there is no public known evidence that it was intentional to have someone killed, so criminal negligence charges...
They were trying to have the trial originally in Antioch area and not Kenosha. That whole failure of extradition and change of venue failed. While you may believe that Kenosha is mostly sympathetic with Kyle here, I am very skeptical on that. The whole riot under false pretenses wouldn't have...
Not going to read all this. My take is there is a lot of fault and blame to go around. The ultimate responsibility is on Alec here though as he pulled the trigger. Basic rules of gun safety taught to anyone that has taken any sort of training, which Alec has, are these.
1) Treat every gun as...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.