So am I to take anything of note from this other than the fact you utilize flamboyant vocabulary in such a way as to ridicule others? I am no expert, but this does not seem worth your implied cerebral superiority - ergo, this is a tragedy and not a comedy?
Unfortunate.
I suspect you're smart enough to understand how easy it is to seem how you wish to seem for whatever purpose you desire when interacting on the internet.
That's the only hint you'll get.
I don't really know what it means. It's certainly not what you would expect to hear, since you didn't hear people chanting "HILLARY! HILLARY" at the RNC.
Differences matter. I don't presume to be smart enough to figure it out beyond that.
I was around for Nowheremom.
I opted not to register for various forums, including this one, until I observed their sales and subsequent complete subjection of moderatorship by corporate interests begin to push my capacity for silence too far.
The sole legitimate venue for your views on our...
So representative of the naive to insult the experienced.
The only thing more amusing is watching them, inevitably with enough time, turn into that which they ridicule.
Did that grown man just air-guitar motor-boating a midget?
Followed immediately by Elizabeth Banks returning to the stage to say "Nope.. that's not what I'm supposed to be saying, I think.. yes!" then start her skit. Well, at least the snarky actor remembered she was on the wrong script. Good...
"Stage Children's Health Insurance", "Women's Insurance", "Women's Breast Cancer", "Women's Healthcare". Repeat two dozen times for accuracy for the past two hours of this dumpster fire.
This racist sexist nonsense absolutely HATES white males!
Yup. Lets parade around more cripples showing the SJW bigots what their tax dollars pay for. Difference between them and normal people is normal people believe in fucking Darwinism.
Poor Tyrian Lannister might actually believe Hillary herself writes those letters instead of some underpaid woman...
Apparently Hillary defies gravity. That definitely explains why she can defy prosecution.
If you can defy one law, you can defy them all. Logic checks out.
More "boo's" being barely covered up by the DSP. Turn the volume up - you can plainly hear it when they make the transition and adjust the sound gates by hand, and you're absolutely lying to yourself if you think otherwise.
Hmm.. well. We're not even halfway into these three nights and this constant barrage of effeminate black men has made me come to a startling realization..
For whatever reason, Democrats have become a bunch of Beta-type males and controlling/bossy/micromanaging women - while the Republicans have...
Hey look - it's Claire Underwood supporting Clinton! Makes sense.
(Yes, I know, but Cecile Richards DOES resemble Claire after a lot of bad botox and 20-25 years)
Well said. Allow me to add a bullet point you missed:
What about the low wages of the A/V technician who is currently controlling the HEAVY usage of a DSP (digital signal processor) which was added between yesterday and today to intentionally drown out the crowds uproar when they aren't...
And all I hope you take from this is that a wager is just a wager. It means nothing else, except to those who wish it to be something it is not.
I only insult you when you deserve it.
Honest mistake on my part - people here routinely troll and speak in double-talk so I just lean towards the defensive. I'm a bit too literal for my own good. Apologies for misunderstanding.
My reply to your question is that it has nothing to do with reality and everything to do with just...
I don't know about honorable, because the term seems to have changed in recent memory, if not in meaning then in spirit. Regardless, I stand by my word and that is enough for me.
There is some small degree of amusement to this entire thing. The more fskimospy attempts to embarrass me, the more...
Why? It's his money. It makes no difference if he does it or I do it. Me donating $100 to the Clinton Campaign is not me donating $100 to the Clinton Campaign, it is fskimospy doing so. Unless I missed something, I'm not the boss of fskimospy.
I get it, it's a childish attempt at burning me -...
Your memory is not as sharp as I thought. Our wager was made after I already put my money where my mouth was for the election.
Certainly. Consider it done.
Nice try on imposing your clueless self narrative on me. Going to pay up means once the bet is actually settled the funds will be transferred. This is not a complex order of operations, even for a brain as damaged as yours.
Seriously. Saying that because the other party refused my request for...
I asked him to do this when the wager was started. He declined. I don't really care if people don't think I'm going to pay up - it says more about them than it does about me.
Because insulting my character without merit shows me what I need to know about yours, just like his.
If in two days HRC gets the nomination then the wager will be settled. I don't really see the point in continuing to ask a question that hasn't been answered yet. I've ignored his jibes because...
Did you even watch the event? I watched the entire thing. At a very loud volume.
Find me a single time anyone chanted Clinton. Then, when you come back unable to I will send you a dozen chants of "WE TRUSTED YOU", "LOCK HER UP", "BERNIE", and "TRUMP". Those aren't even starting on the massive...
You mean the money you owe me? You're delusional if you think HRC will become president.
Actually.. ignoring the fact that literally every speaker but Bernie was boo'd by the crowd so bad they had to spam music to drown it out shows your level of willful oblivion has entered the stratosphere.
99% of the people in attendance are only there because of Bernie. He served his puppet role to populate what would otherwise be another empty HRC event. Good to see HRC getting her money's worth.
Great. I'm pleased to see we both agree that there was no intention of using a bomb-equipped drone to do anything about the bomb and it was entirely used to kill the shooter.
My entire point was that stating the bomb-equipped drone was there for the bomb is deceptive. Maybe it was equipped to...
Sure. Nothing wrong at all. Until this type of equipment is deployed enough that the inevitable human mistakes lead to innocent people being domestically drone-killed, the same way that Swat teams routinely raid the wrong house and kill people and their domestic pets. A robot with C4 strapped to...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.