Search results

  1. O

    The Ryzen "ThreadRipper"... 16 cores of awesome

    Which took the pics from reddit, where one guy (callingthewolf) actually has the CPU and ran the benches. That is 4.1Ghz OC on TR with shitty 3066mhz ram (8 slots populated though) with even shittier timings. Its legit.
  2. O

    Intel Skylake / Kaby Lake

    Its pretty obvious to everyone with at least couple of brain cells that TR forced Intel to bring HCC dies to HEDT platform. They have NEVER done that before. Heck sometimes they haven't even enabled the whole LCC die on HEDT platform like SB-E, which had 8 cores but even the 3970X refresh only...
  3. O

    [Hardware Unboxed] R7 1700 @4Ghz + 3200Mhz RAm = ~7820X @4.5Ghz

    You can do it with good custom loop and delid with LM, if you don't need to apply too much voltage. And its "only" 8 cores.
  4. O

    [Hardware Unboxed] R7 1700 @4Ghz + 3200Mhz RAm = ~7820X @4.5Ghz

    Sent you a PM ;)
  5. O

    [Hardware Unboxed] R7 1700 @4Ghz + 3200Mhz RAm = ~7820X @4.5Ghz

    Crumpet would you be willing to run 3dmark API draw call test with that 3600mhz CL16 and 4ghz? I wanna see what kind of difference it makes compared to 3466mhz CL14 and tightened subs.
  6. O

    [Techspot] AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs. Intel Core i7-7800X: 30 Game Battle! [Links Fixed - Updated]

    This is so goddamn funny when people are saying that these reviews are flawed and Skylake X should be this and that much faster than Ryzen and then these guru's link to reviews where Ryzen is running with memory from 2133 to 2666mhz with NO INFO about what the timings were. And of course Skylake...
  7. O

    Anandtech：Intel's Skylake-SP Xeon VS AMD's EPYC 7000

    Aah c'moon, we need Epyc vs Xeon review from ServeTheHome but it seems they needed to postpone it a bit.
  8. O

    The Ryzen "ThreadRipper"... 16 cores of awesome

    Its partly because of the TIM used there but also because these chips are getting denser which means more hotspots and that is just harder to cool. Everybody who has done even a little bit of extreme oc knows that there is a point when it doesn't matter if you have custom loop with water at...
  9. O

    Ryzen: Strictly technical

    Yeah actually they should be faster because all the tested games are highly multi-threaded. Oh, well, it still shows that there is a penalty on having dependent threads on two different CCX.
  10. O

    Ryzen: Strictly technical

    Yeah it shows that 4 is better than 2+2 as a thought but doesn't tell why 4+4 and 3+3 is so much faster.
  11. O

    Ryzen: Strictly technical

    Kroomatikse, can you link one of those tests because I can only find tests with "4 core" ryzen vs 7700 but not against 8 core ryzen
  12. O

    Ryzen: Strictly technical

    Why nobody hasn't tested games with one CCX completely disabled vs both enabled at the same frequency to see how big the latency penalty is? Or is not possible to disable CCX completely with current BIOS available from mobo makers?
  13. O

    Geforce GTX 1080 Ti now official - Faster than Titan X ($699)

    I guess this is gonna be my next GPU along with Ryzen CPU in a unholy marriage :smirk:
  14. O

    .

    So you're saying you need it for OGL?, last I tried, SSAA did work in OGL apps when forced through control panel. Though I have to say that Nvidia has better SSAA support overall.
  15. O

    DOOM updated with Vulkan support

    I'll try in necropolis as well. Edit: getting regression there. NoAA: 94fps FXAA: 100fps TSAA: 91fps
  16. O

    DOOM updated with Vulkan support

    I tried to test the increase we get from only Async Compute as we know that the path only works with TSAA and no AA. First I checked my fps with no AA enabled in OGL, then with FXAA. Then I switched to Vulkan and redid the tests. No AA and FXAA (which disables async path). I also took the...
  17. O

    DOOM updated with Vulkan support

    I was using TSSAA.
  18. O

    DOOM updated with Vulkan support

    I had the same experience on Fury X, lighter areas showed 40-50% increase but areas where my fps dipped to 40 or so with OpenGL, I saw 75fps with Vulkan. Feels like somebody just installed new graphics card to my computer without me noticing :D Some examples: 3930K @ 4.7Ghz, 16gb 2133mhz DDR3...
  19. O

    AMD Polaris Thread: Radeon RX 480, RX 470 & RX 460 launching June 29th

    TBP = TDP o_O 290w is the right number if we look at TDP. It can be even proven pretty easily by opening reference bios and checking the powertune table.
  20. O

    NVIDIA Pascal Thread

    Yes but that 2x p/w could mean it was measured over Fiji and Raja's 2.5x p/w over Tonga for example. We don't really know. Also who are you referring to with that lead engineer statement... because I'm pretty sure the guy who actually said that wasn't the lead engineer developing Fiji chips.
  21. O

    NVIDIA Pascal Thread

    So why people were talking about 7970 being a paper launch when it was announced on December 22, 2011 and it was in stores on January 9, 2012. That's three weeks. And I don't know about the rest of the world but I got 2 of them at launch day. Soo, maybe this what we call double standards...
  22. O

    Vega 10 — 4096SP AMD Polaris/Vega Architecture Patent

    Sure, if it means that 04-09-2016, 12:07 AM is 30min earlier than this thread. That's when it first came to light on the other thread.
  23. O

    [Videocardz] AMD Polaris 11 SKU spotted, has 16 Compute Units

    If I read that paper correctly, AMD is really trying to make those SP's behave like SMT and add Turbo Boost state when they are being underutilized :eek: Now let's see if they can actually implement this and is it going to be in Polaris / Vega.
  24. O

    NVIDIA Pascal Thread

    Soo, this is the first time ever when they did not reveal new generation Geforce at GTC. I guess we can be pretty sure we will not see any new consumer GPU's before computex.
  25. O

    Rise of the Tomb Raider DX12 Performance Benchmarks

    Did some testing with Fury X and yep, what a nice DX12 patch. I lost around 7fps in soviet installation and it stutters when running in dx12. I can even hear the stutter because my card has some slight coil whine and it stops whining every time the game stutters. That is with everything maxed...
  26. O

    NVIDIA Pascal Thread

    @Arachnotronic To be fair, we also have people here claiming that Polaris paper launches in fall even though we know that they have at least one working polaris chip (most likely two but the second wasn't showed to the public).
  27. O

    The CPU Vendor Bias Admission Thread

    Prefer Intel atm. Last AMD cpu I had was Athlon 64 X2, after that they haven't released anything worth to own.
  28. O

    Hitman DirectX-12 BenchmarksupdateComputerbase

    Ahaha, 980 Ti @ 1380Mhz is only 7-6% faster than 390X (290X) @ 1070Mz depending on resolution o_O I did not expect this kind of result :eek: Are we going to see a pattern where Hawaii was first fighting against GK110, then GM204 and finally GM200 in its final days? Now that would be something...
  29. O

    Do you use VSR/DSR with your games when possible?

    Not gonna vote because I can't use VSR even though I want to, 1600p is not supported resolution :/
  30. O

    [benchmarks] Need for Speed 2016

    More cards tested: 1440p Someone else can post 1080p results, it has been irrelevant resolution for me since 2007 when I got my first 1600p monitor.
  31. O

    Hitman DirectX-12 BenchmarksupdateComputerbase

    I think they are running benchmarks for NFS (2016) as well at the same time.
  32. O

    NVIDIA Pascal Thread

    @crisium: Don't forget that Polaris paper launches in fall because AMD used all their money on that Polaris chip which they demoed two months ago @CES so they can't produce more. They also have to wait for hynix to produce HBM2 chips for reasons only known by few on this board. Sooo... where...
  33. O

    The GPU Vendor Bias Admission Thread

    Hmm, I voted unbiased even though I know that my posting habit most likely looks like that I'm biased towards AMD. But when I look at my gpu purchasing history, I see that I have bought 11 nvidia cards and 12 amd cards for my main rig so I'd say I am unbiased. Though lately my cards have been...
  34. O

    computerbaseAshes of the Singularity Beta1 DirectX 12 Benchmarks

    As were are completely off-topic in here, here's a interesting review which was posted on january: The HD 7970 vs. the GTX 680 – revisited 3 years later
  35. O

    computerbaseAshes of the Singularity Beta1 DirectX 12 Benchmarks

    Nope because I seem to have clicked Silverforce1 review which had lightning only at 1.3ghz so sorry about that.
  36. O

    computerbaseAshes of the Singularity Beta1 DirectX 12 Benchmarks

    Thank you, and now, Osjur leaves the party :sneaky:
  37. O

    computerbaseAshes of the Singularity Beta1 DirectX 12 Benchmarks

    Now wait a second, I happened to to have a card which was faster than the sample [H] had and when I look at the data, I see that OC 7970 winning in 3 out of 4 tests at the resolution which I have had since 2007: 1600p That's why I remember 7970 being quite bit faster. But lets stop...
  38. O

    computerbaseAshes of the Singularity Beta1 DirectX 12 Benchmarks

    That image was taken from TPU review: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_Fury_X_Overvoltage/1.html So Techpowerup doing the testing is not proper benchmark... :rolleyes:
  39. O

    computerbaseAshes of the Singularity Beta1 DirectX 12 Benchmarks

    But lets just say it, it felt mighty good when you had 7970 with over 1.3ghz clocks (1340mhz in my case) and it just roflstomped every 680 (OC'd or not) back in the days. :biggrin: Now if only some review site would do some max oc testing with 7970 vs 680 / 770 or even 780 to see how much gcn...
  40. O

    computerbaseAshes of the Singularity Beta1 DirectX 12 Benchmarks

    I guess you missed this which was posted couple of pages ago. Just think about... it goes over 1.2ghz :eek:
COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |