Is here the fan boys heaven?fake result, strange talking. I have both platform now. the ryzen ipc only grow 3% with structure and totally 10% by clock.
for gaming? you should look this..watch 8600K vs 2700X vs 1700 4GHz.
Why can't you play nice in this area?
You've been warned many times...
pick 7600K($240, overclock) for budget gamer. both game is AMD. I guess some keyboard player never understand 1080p max setting sill less 60fps with any case.
In fact GTA5 can't have 60fps with 480 all the time.
All is amd product and shut up if you not a ture gamer.
Trolling and...
no one care, we have BMD CMD DMD EMD.
Earth is turning.
I bet you don't have too much AMD products compare me.
Trolling and flamebaiting is not allowed
Markfw
Anandtech Moderator
Some amd fanboy just defending the product and waiting for future.
sorry, most ppl in the world looking for now.
no more hype no more future. not any company sell product like that!!
so stranger some crazy fan teach gamer: you need play a game with 4K resolution! you need a ryzen for workload...
4K is wrong method to test CPU gaming performace. this is common sence...
only new bench bottleneck on system. you can;t tell everyone Titan XP will be last graphics king.
Volta coming soon
Keyboard player won't buy any product. I play many things beyond your imagination.
so..you use 4K smart phone? 20inch?30inch? you play resolution?o_O
about 4K..where is my 4K VP9 decoder? never active VP9 with MPC-HC or BE.
700 usd bought
plan 1: 7700K+GTX 1070=$340+$379
plan 2: 1700X(need...
AMD used 4K trick gamer and pick some special for other situation.
I guess some crazy fans forgot the DX12 should be lower the processor loading. if you testing CPU in game, you need low resolution to make a correct heirarchy. 1080p is totally no problem here.
and...I'm one of 1080/Titan X with...
It's PPT technology you little dumb...with this high tech we can run BF9 with DX 22.:p
A Mad Device is the future, you got the future but now?
Everything is fine just like no man's sky fans;)
so..where is my vp9 with rx 400 graphics? i'm waiting a long long time.
sigh...the result will shown this month...stop being a little fanboy.
I still using Xeon for working and i7 for gaming. why should i buy a new CPU to replace them?
I guess some guys never running really project or simulation, a high latency for that? is that a joke?
if you need multi-thread...
5GHz is liquid nitrogen and 4.2@1.5V. 14nm shouldn't be able running here for long time.
"百度貼吧" always bullshit, just take a look...It's joke generator like FX 8350@5GHz(useless overclock lol)
I bought many AMD things, CPU&GPU.
It's really hot and increase Celsius temperature above 3 degree in the summer.
I can't open this one with 39 degree here...
some guys live in the dream?
I wont buy their product with high price. no way.
a company with fail product? A company is gone but the earth is still turning.
this is the reason:
1. for now all of benchmark, I still thinking Intel better(if drop the pirce should be nice)
2.BMW vs Ford, anyone...
you can get more core with Xeon E5 v2... total platform cost cheap
new MB with second hand cpu & ecc ddr3
I saw some blender bench with E5 26x0 v1/v2. same configuration with RyZen still less 1min.
so..this software is a typical core-base.
E5-2670 single channel samples 150 is 55sec if you...
For engineering you are right but here is a problem: precise words
I'll say this
Zen platform idle: 93W
Intel platform idle: 106W
Zen platform load: 187W
Intel platform load: 191W
Zen delta: 94W (RyZen)
Intel delta: 85W (Broaderwell-EP?)
maybe you think this is common sense..but remember...
The only thing we need is 60FPS on gaming...
I don't know GTX 980 with 1080p have any advantage.
I like playing game with Vsync.
Everyone looking at 1440p or 2180p because DSR(VSR) really helpful.
Check review yourself...most of pp stupid....
You wont get any good answer for that.
They only know NV graphics, nothing more.
For now(DX11) GTX 980 have a little advantage on low resolution.
if you consider DX12, R9 390X 8GB is better choice.
I'm always have both company cards for gaming...
no more GTX 970... it's 3.5GB with issue.
if you looking at FPS on ms level, you will find a lot of FPS drop.
R9 390 8GB vs GTX 970 3.5GB bug... this isn't hard choice.
no one wanna upgrade a design bug product..
otherwise you will going GTX 980/Fury X.
I choose GTX 980 and waiting Fury for...
How about DDR4-2666parameter?
DDR3-1600 CL9 have same time with DDR4 3200 CL18
Check main parameter of DRAM and calculate by formula.
T = (1/f )*parameter value
ex. DDR3-1600 CL9, time is 5.625ns(n=10^-9), lower is better :)
R9 390 8GB? NV Cards don't Specialized(Hardware solution) with DirectX 12.
It's soft+hard on NV Maxwell 2.0(GTX 980, GM204).
You may check here for R9 390 8GB & GTX 970 benchmark result.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-amd-radeon-r9-390-8gb-review
GTX 670 still good for...
I won't agree those point about K8 but still waiting more bench.
I m finish my work about processor microstructures research yesterday. might be share it later..
My research and benchmark tell me there is no relationship between CPU-Z and DRAM,
it's a success pure CPU performance benchmark...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.