I agree, If I was making decisions at amd I would think that 1920x 1950x 2920x and 2950x are end of sales. I would come out with 3920x 12 core 4 mem ch 64 Pcie 4 at base clock of 3.8 boost 4.6 125 watts and a price of $699. 3970x 16 core 4 mem 64 Pcie 4 at base of 3.5 boost 4.7 125 watts $899...
Years ago when I gamed a lot I would say yes to a high end really well made card like the Super 2080 or 2080ti. Now I game less and can appreciate anti lag because my reflexes need the help for the few games I play. I guess the point I am trying to make is we all are different and have different...
Yes to this, but ….but.... I have Gigabyte k5 x370 with 1600x and 3200 cas 16 memory and I am itching to go 3700x ($329)with Gigabyte x570 Ultra ($300) some ballistic sports 2x8 G which I hope can do 3600 at least cas16, ($70) PCIE 4 1TB Auros nvme ($260) with a 5700xt card ($400) maybe more if...
Most of AMD's energy and resources will be dedicated to consoles for release in 2020. It would be pertinent to make consoles a mobile product and a console APU for entry level desktops. Just my 2 cents.
Let moonbogg be happy with his comments. It is true that Intel is approximately 3% faster than AMD in 1080 games. Today he can't say that Adobe is the reason for having Intel, I use WinRAR and it is significantly better on Intel, the I9-9900K uses less power than Ryzen, Intel's multi threading...
I would take away from this video and confidently state that there is no way the I7-8700K can match the performance per watt or the performance per price of the 3600.
What I get from this in regards to OC they are talking more about memory as compared to cpu.
1. 5Ghz for memory is realistic but at one half of IF or 2500 which may not be possible.
2. IF maxed out I think and not sure at 1700 In last version of zen.
3. This is a new version of IF. We don't...
My local microcenter has both:
QTY 10+ MSI 1070, Qty 6 MSI 1080, Qty 0 Zotac 1080
Qty 6 8G Visontec 480 Qty 1 XFX 8G 480 cards available. In store pick up only.
Pricing - 1080 MSI $780 1070 MSI $490, Zotac 1080 at $699 is sold out.
The Visiontec is $249 and the XFX is $239.
I will take bets that Kyle will compare 1080 Pascal arch with 480 Polaris arch for performance/ watt without mentioning the 1080 receiving a ~15 watt benefit from using gddr5x memory compared to gddr5.
A little off topic but hbm2 successor could be 3d stacking with the needed cooling and a die stacked memory device with programmable logic, 2 patents that recently were approved.
http://patents.justia.com/patent/9331053
and
http://patents.justia.com/patent/9344091
When you work hard for your money you make sure that you don't spend frivolously. My point is I could spend that on comp stuff. My computer is only one toy, I have other interests also.
It is not just the games that I will purchase in the future, It revolves more around OLED and HDR. I am considering the LG 55 inch. Also Maxwell has shown not to be as capable with dx12
I have a 290x tri oc with 4 gb. This was my first purchase of a card at greater than $350. I generally upgrade every 2-3 years. I guess you are assuming that the 480 will not be better than the 390x or 980. I on the other hand believe that the RX 480 hits the rumored performance of close to Nano...
Did Nvidia promise broad availability when they released their cards? And again we all know that the context of the several months advantage was in reference to laptops and mainstream back to school products which you are spinning as verses the release of a fin fet product or transition.
And...
Originally Posted by Mopetar
It takes 90 to 120 days to complete a wafer on 14nm. Do you go the route of a paper launch in a high volume mainstream segment or do you stock up inventory to meet the expected demand? And yes it appears that they are months ahead in this segment especially for...
Actually a chip that is 14.1 X 16.4 on a 300 mm wafer with .2 defect will yield 239 candidate dies with 153 being good. Which calculates to 4.59 million P10 chips per month. But it takes 90 to 120 days to to complete a wafer. If P10 started ramp up in March they would have this amount available...
And his point is that this will be in future game titles and Pascal will become outdated in 1- 2 years. So everyone who buys pascal now and in the next 8 months will have to buy Volta in 2018 because it does not support 16 half.
Wow just wow that you would draw this conclusion from my statement that a poll on an enthusiast site is predictable and not really telling of peoples purchasing decisions.
I am amazed at how much you are in tune with the general public's purchasing habits. We should all thank our lucky Polaris...
Yea that makes sense, lets get a bunch of enthusiast's who don't mind spending $700 to $1000 on a gpu and see which card they would purchase. I think then you should maybe go out on a limb and give us a prediction of what the results will be.
Dear AMD
I hate you because the way that you conduct business does not agree with what I as a millennial demand to be entitled to. If you are going to release a new gpu you better damn well make sure that it is the fastest card on the planet and you need to do it now. The cost of this card can...
The picture in the slide is either Nano or Fury x. I know that you may consider mainstream 380 380x due to price but remember AMD now considers fury as mainstream from their latest road map.
I guess I could copy my post from a different forum to here.
Is 2300 mhz a pipe dream? Lets just take a look at TSCM 16FF+ technology.
http://www.tsmc.com/english/dedicatedFoundry/technology/16nm.htm
Quote:
TSMC's 16FF+ (FinFET Plus) technology can provide above 65 percent higher speed, around...
Since all of this is being derived from [H] and he usually has his facts not in order. IMO what happen is the AIB complained that Nvidia was cornering the market for first adopters. They probably mentioned that even though AMD would only sell a Fury X as a reference model they were at least also...
You are not even close to a good estimate of profit because you are basing things on same size chip. AMD at 232 mm2 will have almost 2X the amount of good dies as compared to 317mm2 Nvidia GP104
Nvidia did just like Roy Taylor said they would, come out with a chip that does not address TAM. The GP104 is 317 mm2 https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2839/geforce-gtx-1080 and does not address a large market. Especially at a price point of $430 and $700 even though they claim msrp of $380 and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.