The game looks like that it should run smooth as butter even on the Intel HD graphics, but then who would buy new hardware? This franchise is way too popular for letting it just slip. There's no games without hardware and vice versa.
People in a market for a $199 GPU usually don't have a good CPUs and Nvidia's cards are much better into a budget builds due to not having such a huge driver overhead AMD has. Just check all those sad boiz on youtube with Rx 470s paired with i3 or even worse the AMD's future proof manycore CPUs...
The author confirmed in the comment section that the numbers are correct, you can check his other videos, it's great that someone actually tests these cards with a budget CPUs.
Yep and only for the one side ignoring the other, it's like how do even you argue like that. GTX 1060 3GB gets the same harshrates in the ethereum as RX 470 4GB while also being more power efficient.
Nah i don't think so, it's +50% more Vram over one gen, the market will be playing a catch up. There's nothing like you need more than 3GB to play games, not now not in the foreseeable future.
Here in europe you get a dualfan gtx 1060 3gb for the price of the Rx 470 4gb with a blower.
Also I've proved you wrong on the cryptomining in the other thread already, the GTX 1060 3GB is actually equal or even better at it than RX 470 4GB all things considered.
It's just wierd, when 1060 3gb pulls ~10fps in almost all benches ahead of similarly priced rx 470 it's nothing to write back home about, but when all the stars align for rx 470 and it does that same thing for a few brief moments and in a very specific situations(where you wouldn't take that...
It's not like you can't play less demaning games even with HD texture packs, you get performance hit sure but not an unplayable stutter which is some amazing engineering right there from Nvidia, the money they've put into the drivers are paying off. So there's nothing to really worry about, you...
If you look at the market as a whole with the consoles in the picture you can see when and why certain hardware requirements shifts occur. The new consoles will have the same amount of memory as the latest ones, and there will always be a higher ingame settings avaible just because of the...
I don't really have the fortune telling skills as a certain brand prefering members over here to tell for sure that by one example all the future titles follow, but I know what kind of texture quality this card can push and it's alright by me, as I said i don't really focus on textures while...
Well there are many more games it can't play that easily as you can see in the performance table, you can always cherry pick games with a settings where more Vram or a certain card will seem better..
Still a pretty good succesor to the 2GB GTX 960. These are the settings on which you aren't supposed to play with a mid-tier cards like this, and you also get a warning about it in the game while changing it. Really the only weakness of this card, but that's what you get for $50 less.
I...
It's a HD texture pack not supposed to be run on a cards with 4GB or less memory, the performance reduction is the stutter prevention mechanism from the driver.
3 dx12 games with exact frame-rates/times, also true and dx12 only games won't be here yet for years. AMD sponsored titles will probably make it hit the wall though, for obvious reasons.
That's not how Vram works though, look at all the games the 3GB was tested in and could ran on ultra. You can expect to have at least that kind of texture quality in the future on it as well. That's probably as good as it gets on 1080p anyway.
25%(4gb vs 3gb) vs 50% difference (or +33% vs +100%), and there just was a big generational leap as well. I think the new price/performance king will be just fine throughout his effective lifetime.
Many of these cards are running out of breath in the current games on 1080p(<60fps) already, you may need to lower 1 or 2 settings on the GTX 1060 3gb in some games but you will have to lower way more than that on the Rx 470 4gb anyway, and +4GB are an absolute waste on such a slow cards, ultra...
RIP NVIDIA - With AMD you always have to look towards future, they don't necessarily have a good future telling account but as long as you truly believe that this time this is it, you won't regret going AMD. Sure, AMD had to go +100% Vram over one generation unlike Nvidia's +50% while the next...
Sadly you can't really recommend AMD cards into a budget PCs, which usually have a budget CPUs, not into anything below new i5 really. The driver overhead is still there as you can see here.
I'm not really sure why would they choose to release and focus on a budget oriented lineup like this...
How every 470? There are many with different memories and frequencies 4GB and 8GB. Deffinitely not every 470 can hit 25+MH/s just by adjusting clocks.
edit: I mean it was obvious that you went off to eth forums and came back with the highest number you've seen, so it's kind of funny that you...
25-27MH/s are 8GB with higher clocked memory and OC or 470s with heavily modded bioses, not many people are willing to risk bricking their cards and 22MH/s 1750Mhz is max for 4GB after that the memory timings go up and hashrates go down.
Haven't seen GPU cores lowering hashrates, on the mem...
How will the cut down 1060 be worse than the full in ethereum? It has the same memory bandwidth. Full 1060 can do 20-22MH/s dependant on mem OC, that's what you get with 470 4gb on 1650-1750Mhz mem.
Freesync Gsync are just a memes, just like SLI or Crossfire. Once you have it you know you've been had by the PR dep and the memezors still high on hype.
You can see here which games will most likely run better on AMD cards just like Hitman Deus Ex, these titles are a part of many sites'...
If 3 is pointless than 4 isn't? It isn't that big of a leap, and devs most certaintly aren't going to kill off support for that many cards and consumers with less than 4GB vram anytime soon, not when they are still the majority of the market. Sure they make you feel the need of more Vram when...
I don't know boiz, it costs the same as the cheapest RX 470 4GB in my country. I might need to lower the textures from ultra to very high at 1080p in a few games but I'd get a way more out of that chip, whether it's OC, power efficiency, price/perf, I could even mine eth at similar hash rates.
But when you overclock the RX 460 you get pretty close the the GTX 950 which is a 160$ card, that's pretty good for a 109$ tiny 14nm chip. AMD will earn 'em moneiz
I mean, RX 460 is an Esports processing unit, although recommending and sometimes even praising it, reviewers just misunderstood its purpose, i bet the price/perf is amazing in an Esports focused benches. AMD always delivers for those on budget, it's not their targeted audience for no reason...
They would be competing with their own cards, and at some point it could even mean better deals for the consumer if there wouldn't be that bad competition's offer excuse, and AMD hasn't been really trying to progress or compete latetly. I definitely wouldn't support a company which isn't even...
Raja was talking about how PC gamers like 'em specs etc. and there's still a month to go, maybe that's why they made the graph so intriguing. It's probably made by some engineer or Rajesh himself thinking he's giving his boiz a plaything to theorycraft with. Also RX 480 at 199$ with 150W and...
51% is about efficiency, hitting just behind that gtx 1080 60fps mark. More performance with a lower power consumption. I'd say. " Better performace + Efficiency "
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.