I guess this thread was on to something: http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2479725
This stuff is making me not want to buy Nvidia just because it is so annoying. It's like the guy that kept spamming the AMD reddit about the pcie power draw until it became a big deal. Just leave it...
I'm seeing in the Techspot review that a 7% OC yielded an 8% increase in performance in the two games they tested. Is this normal because it is just a small OC?
Meant to say ultra, not max. I was using the Techspot benchmarks as a reference and they are using ultra settings. Their results are very similar to AMD. Everything beyond a 970 is getting 140+ FPS in Overwatch. I guess your results are using the "epic" settings but this still seems like a huge...
Given that the RX 470 was getting 121 fps in Overwatch at 1080p max, you should be able to get around the 144 fps you're targeting with the 480.
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/radeon-rx-470-benchmarks.html
Probably already said but you can't compare AMD and Nvidia using firestrike. Just looking at the lower videocardz.com results we can tell that the 480 will be ahead of the 390x and 980 in most real gaming. The 390x is about 9% behind the 980 in these benchmarks but the 390x is ahead of 980 in...
Just wanted to point out one thing. I noticed that AMD never said what their settings for point light quality, glare quality, and shadow quality were in the benchmark. I see that you are using the high setting. Could you try using the ultra setting on these options to see if the results change...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.