I wanted to elaborate; right now edc and adaptive clock both operate, but not as a single field. EDC does not command the voltage step. It drops bins upon vdroop, but doesn't have a facsimile cpu bin voltage stretching feature. It could have a normative voltage field offset just as adaptive...
There was a mention of IF max clock. 2400 it was. Looking in the same mindframe with 1.6:1 ratio, it enables 7200MHz ddr(double data rate). Btw, 3200/1066 equates 1.5, sorry about that.
Do OEM's set IF clock? I don't know if it were a thing. We have discussed this with seronx, the result was IF could run @1066 to keep this 3200MHz memory rate. Comparatively with zen 3, the generational gap is present. Also, 2400 is likely, I haven't seen its mention.
It is a matter of whether AMD just patched adaptive clock, or went the whole profile bin tuning route. You can have wee bit of clock stretching at the turbo bins, however it is blind faith to assume that is how mobile thriftiness is supposed to work. Either the bins need near voltage threshold...
Ryzen Master provides you on pointers as to how you can revert back to basics. Generally, even 3900X has a correspondingly low base setting(90A EDC - equal to 60A on 3700X). The gist of the matter is that EDC provides another safety net which should fall just shy of the PPT limit.
Also, PBO is...
When discussing designated TDP performance, I think a major portion of the emphasis is on task power per stock TDP. This is an area in which major contenders take a heavy blow by the underdogs(Apple vs. Qualcomm & Intel vs. AMD). Intel for instance cuts short the frequency bins when running...
Hi,
I just found this on Reddit which I happened to consider to be useful for comparison's sake between EDC vs. PPT settings. Normally, you would think power regulation via PPT should fare better. That is more than likely, not to be the case. PPT helps relieve socket TDP for untampered...
In my last contribution, in this video doctor Aneesh goes on to differentiate between gate devices. If you scroll around 15:30, Finfet is the upside down perpendicular version of a double gated transistor and the gate at the end of the road is a gaafet.
I understand you fully and suggest an alternative: compliance is unnecessary. The justification of the quantum electron field is here and now. Rather than debate and try imposing our will through rationalisations, we should let the elegant solution come about by its own expression in the outside...
Keep your cpu. You can do whatever is necessary to dvr the stream through MadVR. The 3900X is a candid cpu which will enable to run 'any' upsampler you wish. Personally I like superxbr for upsampling and bilateral stuff for chroma - these don't require much cpu power. Neural stuff that used to...
Physical phenomena doesn't have to make even with our comprehension. That is what physics inquiry is for.
I don't think this is far off the shot with electron spintronics, but that is not the point of the debate. Spintronics aim subthreshold stochastic spiking of individual electron quantum...
I totally get that the gate '"flow' induces it, but that is not how it happens. It still passes against the grain across where the resistance should be highest near the interface. That is not how V=IR explains it. It should have followed the near threshold conduction where resistance is lowest...
I cut a bit of my digressions on how mbcfets follow on the soi promise. I'm not smart enough to judge but maybe I got inspired by this gentlemanly professor:
Too stupid to help, sorry for gaslighting the experts with my curious parroting.
Definitely likely that I am clueless. Yes, I am mixing the two since there hasn't been any discrimination up until now.
Transistors don't follow Ohm's Law. Certain characteristics are transmuted at higher source-drain potentials. Normally, I would think the gate acts by blocking the flow, yet...
You need to know where the main body of current flows, it is at the top at the gate perimeter. Lack of physical contact between the drain and source make unexcited electrons unable to bridge the gap.
@~11:00, you can see the drive characteristics of a finfet. More voltage, more tunnelling there...
What I consider most interesting about electron properties is, it has dual spin states whose axes are perpendicular and those are actually the only paths it takes at any time, so each time the electron jumps anywhere it is to either of these non-tracable(until perturbed) trajectories.
You could...
Most white papers don't elucidate what is so special about either the mbcfet, or gaafet. While similar in most aspects to their finfet cousin, mbcfets use the quantum tunnelling property to drive electrons in its wake. Since the bottom source stacks are not conducting to the upper gate stacks -...
Llano might be it, however through sheer execution alone Richland marks a turning point. I'd say it isn't the landmark, but switching speed alone ensures that it is possible. Auto-designs aren't the fastest because hand traced circuits cut down on excess transistors and interface routing. So, it...
Yes, at the time Intel didn't miss out its chance to pass on how it was the one, true honest cpu designer. I admit, I was persuaded into thinking Bulldozer was an auto-disaster, but Steamroller Richland & its compact library was the first iteration I suppose.
PS: In previous redaction, I said...
Plus, I think we need not disassociate the process node from process performance. Intel has been doing great on 14nm, a long in the tooth reason is process performance due to power customization - big gates don't deduce from the performance, nor increase impedance. Best execution at any...
I disagree. Many remember him without the 'netbook' escapade.
He was quite the visionary at the dawn of netbooks, he in fact pioneered its beginning with Geode processors. Too bad it was a very lean project without much premium covering its assets which served to Intel's proclivities further...
Ho! Easy there fella, no insulting farm animals while domestic violence is revelled as history. America, the land of the strange.:)
Please keep it on topic, this isn't the Social forums.
Daveybrat
AT Moderator
But all the while, zen has been the killer inside joke of the industry. We know they will upgrade the branch predictor as well. So, why stop there? SMT4 and branch predictor have very similar characteristics. Both are basically prefetchers.
AMD is execution port discreet architecture whereas Intel is port unified. Each have benefits, but unified schedulers increase single thread throughput. Hence, AMD is better at playing along Nvidia gpus because AMD doesn't have thread optimisation while Nvidia does. This has implifications...
Hardware.info had a similar synopsis on Vega. The tipping point of Poole-Frenkel Effect is rather steep and no buffering is being spared by the driver. I like it that undervolting yields get easier to plot...
While true that 40% clock speed uplift would entail 3.5>4.5GHz Ryzen 7's, I think the true benefit is again from the process scalability in bringing forth 24-core Rippers at the same power envelope as current Ryzen's.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.