Search results

Post it on tomshardware.

There are multiple ARM and other IP cores already implemented in pretty mature stage so very accurate results are already available. Although, these numbers might change in future re-spins (oriented for price and manufacturing economics). Btw.: it is impressive that this huge area jump is still...

Do you think that TSMC/Samsung will share their know-how with Intel? Why there are not companies offering 14/10/7nm in China, Russia or Middle east? They have capital to buy whatever they want. Why it is Exclusive only in Taiwan/Korea? Maybe because it is not just that simple as buying...

100% agree with you. Lets use real world density they use in real world applications which generates majority of revenue for them. For N14 it is 14mxtors Intel, 25m others. For 10 it will eventually be around 30m for Intel and 50 milion per square mm for others. Continuing 60vs100, 120vs200...

Witeken is just troling. Even if they fires him today, he will keep loving them... Just look at link in his description: http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/apple-a10-geekbench-4-score.2485468/page-4#post-38464277 It was 2016, he already knew how Intel screwed with 14nm (paperlaunch in 2014...

Is anyone here optimistic about their plans? I mean, even if it will be better this time (Larabe), do you think they will offer it at lower price? For comparison: 65nm interposers has 45 um bumps (these was used back in 2011). You probably forgot to mention this detail.

It will not beat it even in metrics they prefer. They are using metrics which is favorable for them but they never really talk about routed gated density. And there is good reason for this (same reason why every their foundry customer ran away). To get back to topic: It is important for die...

Its just estimate and key part is to design. As i said, most expensive part of it is pay team of engineers. Tape-out itself is relatively cheap. Most of companies has more variants in every series (varying core count, gpu size...) I just got you one great example of company with very limited...

For cache latency, well it is what you might expect from this organization. For details you will have to look for official sources or some leaks... Well, this is pretty important. Node is already better and 7nm will be well practically well ahead of 10nm. There is no "mess in node names".

If i can correct this $200M statement... it definitely don't cost so much. Well, it depends... You can tape-out leading-edge silicon for less than 1M USD. Bigger part of costs will be IP fees, design tools/support and pay for engineers you employ (in listed order). Only salary for team of...

It is not only this specific use case. I can't go into details, but there are applications, where Centriq advantage is much bigger than here. Basically, Centriq has chance to beat Xeons in every field, where Xeons managed to beat big iron architectures (zX, SPARC). And off course, Centriq lags...

You can find different studies on this topic, some in favor x86, some in favor ARM... And mostly it is just 2 operations. Little off topic since there it is not about process, but i want to add: In theory Intel's process looks good, thanks to split pitching they achieved best dimension in...

ILP is given by implemented algorithm and ISA. And since ARM and x86 ISA are completely different there is no reason to believe, that ARM will hit same IPC wall as x86. ARM has for example advantage in limited backward compatibility, so new instructions are encoded more effectively. When ARM...

They will never ship them (expect few close members like Microsoft), because there is no reason for anyone to buy them. Xilinx already offers more LUTs, more DSP (22 TMACS), 56/112G transceivers, HBM/DDR IP, PCI gen4... So customers who need it already have it available for years. Best thing...