Search results

O
Will SETI, ECCP, RC5 or any other DC project give me stability?

Well if SETI/ECCp/etc had standardized setting it would make like a whole lot easier ;) Steve
- otlg24
- Post #9
- Sep 9, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
ECCp-109 Team Race Update (Sun Sep 9)

Droolman, That isn't a dump ;) That's normal production from my LAN at full power ;) I'm working on some service clients for the stations, and then that will be my standard 24/7 output. I'm also doing rc5 on those machines during the week (till I get a fast service client built)...
- otlg24
- Post #21
- Sep 9, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
ECCp-109 Team Race Update (Sun Sep 9)

Rendus: More power = good ;) Steve
- otlg24
- Post #19
- Sep 9, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
ECCp-109 Team Race Update (Sun Sep 9)

^ BUMP FOR ECCP However, I completely understand if folks are transitioning to SETI for the big race... as long as they come back ;) Steve
- otlg24
- Post #17
- Sep 9, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
Will SETI, ECCP, RC5 or any other DC project give me stability?

I would jump over and help out the SETI team except for 2 things: (1) By the time I get seti configured on all the boxes it will hardly be worth the effort. It takes a while to hand config a lan <sigh> (2) SETI's work units are just too damned big. I figured seti would eat 8GB a month+ on my...
- otlg24
- Post #7
- Sep 9, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
Will SETI, ECCP, RC5 or any other DC project give me stability?

Tweakmm & Rendus: You guys ever going to come back to eccp? :( Steve
- otlg24
- Post #3
- Sep 9, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
ECCp-109 Team Race Update (Sun Sep 9)

Sorry viz, Everything was kind of a blur... I had the network firing on all fours for a while.. I need to get service clients built ;) Steve
- otlg24
- Post #16
- Sep 9, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
odd RC5 results while overclocking...

not for rc5
- otlg24
- Post #2
- Sep 7, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
Domain with IP-address?

kirafu, nslookup <ipaddress> Failing that, start looking for IPs in blocks of 64... i.e. nslookup 192.168.0.1 nslookup 192.168.0.65 nslookup 192.168.0.129 nslookup 192.168.0.193 and then in blocks of 32.. it's very rare than any isp will have ip blocks smaller than 32. Steve
- otlg24
- Post #2
- Sep 3, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
ECCp-109 Team Stats as of (Wed Aug 29 12:18:01 2001)

DNet: You didn't post about me crossing the old 1500 mark when I did it.. I all depressed now :( (LOL) Steve
- otlg24
- Post #2
- Aug 29, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
Vent: Co-workers claim the distributed.net client is a virus...

Virge, Remember we are talking about paranoid corporate america here.. I just got a call from an old site yesterday.. haven't been for >2 years.. they had one running and are all freaked out... <sigh>. clueless morons. Steve
- otlg24
- Post #11
- Aug 27, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
Vent: Co-workers claim the distributed.net client is a virus...

McAffee reports dnetc as a possible virus, and given the dnetc worm, you can't really blame them. Steve
- otlg24
- Post #8
- Aug 27, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
ECCp-109 Team Stats as of (Sat Aug 25 10:31:42 2001)

ECC Proxy Update: Save your time.. there is just too much malformed data flowing across for me to catch it all with the proxy.... I will look into dropping in an alternate transport mechanism to the clients. Steve
- otlg24
- Post #6
- Aug 25, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
ECCp-109 Team Stats as of (Sat Aug 25 10:31:42 2001)

Okay everyone, I tossed up a new version that should work with the bugs as they exist. The blocks to send count isn't perfect, but it shouldn't crash.. it will buffer and send anything past what it thinks is 20 (which is anywhere from 20-30)... Steve
- otlg24
- Post #4
- Aug 25, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
ECCp-109 Team Stats as of (Sat Aug 25 10:31:42 2001)

Forget it, this is pointless... I'm not writting an http server, especially considering the bugs in the post data this client is sending.. Content Length 1430 (according to post header) Data sent 1414.... <grumble>... no proxy until I talk to Chris about the data the client sends out.
- otlg24
- Post #3
- Aug 25, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
ECCp-109 Team Stats as of (Sat Aug 25 10:31:42 2001)

Attn everyone.. I should be posting a new version of the ecc proxy tonight.. my apologize for not doing it sooner but had a doozy of a week at work.. and it only got worse as it went. Steve
- otlg24
- Post #2
- Aug 25, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
New here and wondering

Russ, How yeah been? Kinda OT I know.. but this thread is en-route to hell, via la handbasket anyway ;) Whatcha cracking/searching/crunching/etc. now? Steve
- otlg24
- Post #13
- Aug 22, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
New here and wondering

Okay, So let's see if I get this right.. TA/SO tried once again (when I say I'm new here I mean I haven't been here in a while) to do something.... and it doesn't work.. again... Next question... why is it always TA/SO.. why not TA/AT... (looks cooler IMHO)... what I'm asking is, what is...
- otlg24
- Post #6
- Aug 22, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
need routing help to get seti working at my branch location

Set your branch up to have a gateway of 10.0.1.200 (default gateway on the machines)... hopefully, if the routers are configured correctly that should be all you need to do... seeing as they are routers they should be....
- otlg24
- Post #2
- Aug 22, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
New here and wondering

What was the deal with the TA/SO split.. anyone care to fill me in, in a nutshell? :confused:
- otlg24
- Thread
- Aug 22, 2001
- Replies: 12
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
Congratulate me :)

Viz, Congrats man.... I know how miserable uncertainty can be. Steve
- otlg24
- Post #35
- Mar 5, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
New Challenges

We over at ProcessTree/Dcypher are working on something special for you folks out there (on the volunteer side.. the pay side is doing interesting things as well)... hopefully there will be 4-5 volunteer projects at PT for you to enjoy... <evil grin> Steve
- otlg24
- Post #4
- Mar 5, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
its gone way too far...

I'm sorry.. but we were kinda slap happy on Friday and we just had to do that ;) Steve
- otlg24
- Post #4
- Mar 5, 2001
- Forum: OT Discussion Club
O
MaxSiren - Welcome thread

Max, Try setting the memory interleave on the P3 on the VIA chipset.. that should greatly boost seti perf. Steve
- otlg24
- Post #15
- Mar 3, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
Please downgrade your d.net clients to v2.8010 or before

In fairness to d.net I don't think this is something people could exploit to cheat. As far as I can tell they still have to live through ogr work times... actually I think I know how you COULD exploit it, but I'm not going to say. Steve
- otlg24
- Post #65
- Feb 28, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
Please downgrade your d.net clients to v2.8010 or before

Poof: Very familiar with the exploits of both Mr. Beberg and the folding@home crew... I speak with Vijay@stanford on a psuedo regular basis. Regards, Steve
- otlg24
- Post #57
- Feb 27, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
Please downgrade your d.net clients to v2.8010 or before

Virge: Just a minor point of order.. It's COSM not cosmo.. cosmo was an SGI opengl viewer for windows at one point in time I think... Steve
- otlg24
- Post #50
- Feb 27, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
ProcessTree.com first paid distributed computing project.

Train: Re: Taking it hard It's not so much that we take it hard, but rather we are disappointed by the knee jerk reaction from people that Chris and Myself have personally corresponded with for a period of YEARS now. Guys like Virge especially hit hard, after I for one gave him 500K of my old...
- otlg24
- Post #19
- Feb 18, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing
O
ProcessTree.com first paid distributed computing project.

Mindless, Re: Im not sure how usefull this will actually be. In order to test web site performance the connections will need to have 0% packet loss. Just 2% packet loss will scew the results. Since most home internet connections aren't exactly reliable this makes it even worse. I think at this...
- otlg24
- Post #18
- Feb 18, 2001
- Forum: Distributed Computing

RESOURCES

Top Bottom