And you know the methology of those tests from 'metareview'? And they are clearly better? You have that certainty? Like Computerbase shown above? Definitely much better methodology. 3 basically the same benchmarks, and one crippling internally one of the tested processors.
If anything the...
And 7600XT is 5% faster than 13600 K according to HU 54 games benchmark.
And according to 'metareview' based on 6-8 usually the same tests it's 13600 K which is 5% faster. That's why this 'metareview' is crap. You take already distorted results (too little sample of games) and multiply them 10...
Surely not. They sank billions and billions dollars in their failed 10 nm process. Definitely more than TSMC. This is the cost intel pays for their chips. And they are sinking now another billions and billions in 7 nm and next ones (at the same time).
And as long as they won't find new...
Yep. Only those two benchmarks are off. And when buggy as hell CP2077 cripples AMD processors (famous SMT OFF) and GPUs it's all fine and dandy.
BTW People are more interested in BV than B2042. B2042 is almost totally non existent. It failed miserably and people returned to BV and BI. BV...
That's why gaming tests in launch reviews should be totally ignored. Unless they have a really big number of games tested (and usually it's not true due to time constraints).
It's not a surprise it's actually the same what AMD said on their slides (5% faster than 12900K, and many reviews put 13...
You're right. I must have missed it. They hinted about much better clocks. Not as loud as with processors (well even Lisa was talking about it). Especially Naffziger claims are now problematic for them. Because Wang was much more reserved ('even faster' ..well they are faster but not that much)...
Perceived because maybe due to reasons of architecture they can not be clocked higher for now. If something can not be clocked higher you can not say it's clocked low. It's not the same. Because where is that limit you consider good enough? 3 GHz? Why not 5 GHz? After all CPU chips are clocked...
The best hypothesis I read. I don't think that there are any serious bugs in silicon preventing RDNA3 from clocking high. It's not like they produced million chips and it turned out it doesn't clock high. There were many samples/revisions before.
RDNA3 is what it is. The perceived low clocks may...
I'm not disappointed in RDNA3 actually, but yeah due to 'leaks' I expected more. But it's not like AMD promised me something and they didn't keep a promise. Far from it.
That 'leaks' had influence on my expectations is only my work, not AMD.
Like I said I was never customer for 1200 card even...
AMD this time was not so strong on crypto market. Even miners preferred nVidia. GCN was much better for crypto than RDNA. But yeah AMD cards also benefited from crypto boom but nowhere near as nVidia. I doubt designing chips they were taking it into consideration prioritizing again high end...
Well.. who knows.. maybe. One of the earliest rumors were claiming that this time Navi 33 will be first launched. So no high end cards at first. Maybe something changed on the way and they decided after all to launch high end cards first (for unknown reasons).
Fact is APU with the latest...
I can buy 4090 in my country, no problem. From the first launch day to current day. You know just for over 2000 EUR. Not many eager to pay.
Anecdotal? Yes. True? Either.
If this is nVidia's plan for business they are doomed (joking).
DLSS 3 is pure crap (any technology giving such horrible artifacts is crap). If anyone cares better buy TV with this 'revolutionary' technology. It will be cheaper and
works on every game from start. Either way your latency goes to hell so who cares.
CUDA are worthless on gaming cards because...
No. Simply no. 4090 was not held back by anything. It's a 4K. Any modern processor is enough.
If processor is slower it's slower for both cards. Not for one.
You can even compare data for the same games on both sides. Let's look at them.
Game
TPU benchmark - 6950 XT/4090 (5800X)...
Actually it works in the other way. It is only more profitable if AMD has costs in let's say EUR. And that's only if you don't take into consideration that those costs will be higher due to inflation also. And I doubt there are many costs they pay in EUR.
So strong $ means only one thing for AMD...
It's not about engines only. 70% of games are on Unreal engine. And you don't want to sum up 70% of games to one example that is as much important as engine with one game on it.
Moreover implementation of engine can vary in a big way. There are games on Unreal engine where intel fares better...
In 4K? Let me be very doubtful. It's because they actually choose big set of games (25), and not like most of reviewers 7-8, including 4 sponsored by nVidia.
And they were always very favorable to nVidia (I mean TPU, not games).
They have now probably review with most games at least until HU...
This looks like all those 'legimite leaks' last time that RDNA 2 will only compete with RTX 3070. And we all know how it turned out. Not only competing with Ampere but beating it in 1080p and 1440p in rasterization.
Some idiots were even counting frames in demo from AMD Zen 3 presentation to...
Here we are.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-4090-founders-edition/39.html
CP2077 RT On, 4K, Max settings 477 W, and spikes to almost 500 W.
Maximum Consumption 468W against RTX 3090 363W. Over 100W more. The same as this freak of the nature 3090Ti.
With 52% (!) better...
Yep, exactly. Disappointing. Comparing power efficiency against 3090 Ti is very wrong because 3090 Ti was already freak of the nature. Against 3090 we have 55-60% in 4K for 100 W (25%-30%) more power, 2.7 times more transistors, all those additional thousands of shaders, new cache, much better...
But then you have to trim down performance from those benchmarks about 10% due to lack of DDR5, and you are in territory of Zen 3 performance with its gaming king 5800X3D (with that 12700K stands no chance).
If you don't want new platform (with DDR5) AM4 with 5800X3D is still much better option.
They don't know what they talk about. They didn't deliver any proof, but it's enough to put in google phrase '6000 vs 6400 DDR5 benchmark' to get benchmarks of those 'massive' gains.
First one Tom's hardware.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gskill-trident-z5-rgb-ddr5-6400-c32-review
CPU...
Man, you're definition of grasping a straw.
If anand will continue their policy in test you won't see Alder Lake tested with 6000 DDR5. They test (and rightfully) with rated speed by chip producer, so 4800 for Alder Lake and 5200 for Zen 4 (and with 5600 for RL). It will be even worse for AL...
Ohh... it's a long history for intel squad. Like taking performance of 'K' models but price of 'F' and 'non K' models. Like there was no difference in specification between these models (max boost, max all core boost, power limits, iGP etc).
Maybe on some promotion on Newegg. In my country the difference is about $100. You can buy new mobo for this $100 and put 5600X in it.
In games (and this is processor for games market, not MT performance) it gives 12600K 3% advantage over 5600X.
People happily trade this 3% for mobo.
Simply...
I would not call them worse. They bin them as worse but that's not the same. The worse die on my 5900X would be probably good die on 5600X.
Every core on my worse die boost well over 4.9 GHz (on my better die every core boost over 5 GHz). Some of those cores on worse die would probably boost...
Sorry, but you clearly has no clue what you talk about. The first mention of overhead in drivers shows you clearly has no clue (and quoting purepc.pl, these guys really don't know what they talk/write about).
Unfortunately you don't know how GPU works. So here is a link from someone who knows...
I seriously doubt. You base your opinion on TPU review and their 'explanation'. It's really not that hard to find review where results are totally different from TPU and using slower memory.
Here is a test of Witcher 3 with memory speed of 3200 on both platforms with not that great timings of...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.