Considering they are claiming 14% IPC uplift for Lion's Lunar Lake. I can see it reaching close to 16% for the Arrow Lake version. If there is indeed some clock regression, 10-12% increase while improving energy efficiency significantly will be a pretty good update over Raptor Lake.
https://www.phoronix.com/review/intel-xeon-6780e-6766e
“The Xeon 6780E 2P was delivering slightly better performance than the Xeon 8592+ 2P at... 70% the power consumption on average. The generational uplift in power efficiency with the Xeon 6700E is significant. Or if still relying on Ice Lake...
Got a 4070 Super, coming from a 2060 is quite a huge jump. Almost 3x in a lot of games I tried at 1440p. I'm going to try to do some undervolting and slight OC.
Why would you have an event to overclock laptop CPUs meant to provide a jump in efficiency. Intel is a master at shooting at their own foot. Pretty horrible showing.
Nothing to do with that, it's a comparison between two power curves that do not touch ("MTL beats Phoenix") vs two power curves with a different slope that will eventually meet, before they met at 65W or so now it looks like they will meet at 40W. They are two complete different statements.
But...
"Meteor Lake is supposed to beat Phoenix". Implies MTL should/must beat Phoenix at all power levels -> crazy nuts
"oone in their right mind thought that Intel 4 + RWC (or GC+) was going to beat N4 + Zen4 in perf per watt. Although it might at some power levels." Implies Phoenix will more...
Not at all. MTL was supposed to close the gap as much as possible as noone in their right mind thought that Intel 4 + RWC (or GC+) was going to beat N4 + Zen4 in perf per watt. Although it might at some power levels.
Why would you bring to desktop an architecture meant for power effiency, with...
And to be honest, I'm waiting for post-CES reviews but if Golden Pig pcore update results are validated it would beat Phoenix at perf/watt above 35W. Ofc is not the ideal scenario for a laptop CPU but it's much better than 13th gen against Phoenix/Zen4.
No it didn't. Even in the first Notebookcheck review, which everyone used to tell us MTL was a failure, it beat the 13th gen at all tested power levels.
It does use less power to achieve the same performance. Proven over and over again. Even in the first benchmarks. The pcore update just adds more margin between 13th gen and MTL.
Revenue share doesn't mean units and therefore marketshare. Intel can sell more Xeons at lower prices and generate less revenue than AMD selling at higher cost per unit.
Yeah would have been a great review if we had power levels along with performance results. His benchmarks seem to be a bit on low side but within margin of error, I saw several ZenBooks reaching 2400 points is ST in GB6. But again it's about 2% difference. Very encouraged by the battery life.
Didn't they confirmed All-in-Ones back in September? But that market should be quite small so it may take some time, most corporate environments have laptops + dockers.
They are using PL1 and PL2 numbers straight out from the specs sheet. No indication in any of those test it hit those power levels.
It's like posting 13900K gaming numbers and saying it needed 250W to achieve those results. Complete baloney.
I would expect a wider bus and an increase in effective bandwidth. If not... why move the RAM to the chip?
At least that is what I interpreted from the leaks
We still need more test to confirm new pcode situation (if confirmed new BIOS includes the update) but also the new GPU drivers which should fix the abysmal drop in performance of the iGPU when going under 30W. If Intel manages to fix those things, MTL will become a very interesting product for 24.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.