What's the point of comparing them at the same TDP?
Assuming @hsm is right and 33K is the stock score, then you'll get nT performance uplift ~ 13-14% in CB R23 (33 / 29 * 100).
To be fair, the actual core clocks in the R23 MT are still unknown. Not to mention the fact that some reviewers measured 29,3 - 29,5 MT score for the 7900X which makes it only +12%.
Omg, those residents again...
AMD has implemented the Effective Frequency Interface since first Zen, idk why all...
If two CCDs are placed very close and are restricted to run at the same frequency, idk why there should be any issues. Also, the cores are probably need to be arranged as close as possible to one of the chiplet edges.
But anyway, I agree with Joe NYC's thoughts above.
I'm not sure if two v-cache CCDs are needed at all.
If we assume they managed to get the V-cache CCD Fmax equal to that of regular CCDs, you'll still end up with inter-CCD penalty. Different CCD Fmax will make things even worse.
P.S. Unless there's a big single L3 chunk glued-TSV'ed atop of...
No one seems to mind that LNL iGPU performance shown in two least representative 3DMark tests, TS and WLE.
At least with ARC, TS score has little to do with gaming performance. The same goes for Nomad
The Fire Strike Extreme is way more suitable for comparing Intel and AMD GPUs in real-world...
With the cherry-picked set of games and "Intel Baseline Profile", why not? )
Just wondering if reviewers gonna use it with Intel CPUs in Zen 5 launch tests.
Really? )
Since when did performance increase linearly with power?
Or maybe the GFX clock in Rdna 3.5 decently higher than that in Rdna 3.0 GPU at the same power?
And btw, where does it state that these scores are "graphics"?
The thing is, TS graphics score correlates perfectly with dGPU gaming performance, which is not the case with APUs, if the claimed gain of 36% is true.
Btw, that promo said
780M's shared memory run at what, 5200mt/s?
I'm not sure what "communicate" means in that context, but with regards to boost behavior they have changed nothing
Yes, that's it. Although I'd not take it as a mistake.
Very well may be.
Apparently you've never been told that speaking in the third person is bad manners
1. There were talks from amd reps about why boost clocks are not reached and all that residency BS after people and tech media started to complain that Zen2 is unable to do that.
2. Now there are again talks of frequency residency.
It's as simple as this.
So what prevents them from changing it...
Probably not. We're discussing an article from TH:
"AMD's Ryzen 9000 won't beat the previous-gen X3D models in gaming, but they'll be close — improved 3D V-Cache coming, too"
And yet, videocardz says that this result is from stock 9600X. Something doesn't add up in their leaks.
https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-ryzen-5-9600x-engineering-sample-gets-overclocked-to-5-7-ghz-across-all-cores
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.