I would hate to think how close I'd have to sit to a 27" 5K monitor to make out every pixel.
You are right, there doesn't seem to be demand for it. Even the 4K 43" monitor market is sparse. I recall many years ago buying my old 27" monitor that was 2560x1440. It was cheap enough for something...
You don't need to match. The most important thing is to keep the pixel density the same. If you don't things will be too big or too small on one of your screens.
I have a 4K 43" monitor and love it. But am wondering why there are no large 5K monitors. I see plenty of wide monitors, and some 27" 5K monitors. But nothing in what I believe is an ideal pixel density (for me anyways) which would be around a 50" monitor.
So why don't we see any large 5K monitors?
So I got my new parts today and put it together.
Run the same job on hitman express. It was processing about 5 seconds of footage every second. That is much better.
I was surprised that the CPU did not go to 100% utilization. It sat around 85%. The GPU 3D engine was around 40% usage, although...
Well, I don't have my new parts yet. But with my old system (6600K) my CPU maxes out at 100%, I use about 8GB of ram, my GPU seems to be running at 25% or less and my SSD bounces from maxed out to almost nothing.
I normally do video about 10 minutes long. It takes about 15 minutes to process...
Just bought a new CPU 12400F and motherboard to upgrade my old 6600K. Is there any benefit to upgrading to 4400 2x16GB ram? I don't game, but do some video editing with Hitfilm express.
Some other specs
256GB Samsung 950 pro
Nvidia 660GTX -> wouldn't mind upgrading, but not at todays prices
4k...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.