YA - Same thing happened to me and others have reported the same problem as well. Don't know what our problem is though.
Make sure you have no other AV on your system.
No, in fact, *ALL* engines do as I purport since simple physics explains how an engine works. An "ideal" engine model would aspirate with 100% efficiency and would have a flat torque curve vs RPM. HP would increase proportionally to RPM because HP is proportional to RPM times Torque.
But in...
Obviously you have never "Studied up" BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH man!
Following are two simple non technical questions that even you can answer and those answers will demonstrate what a moron you are:
1) Consider a situation where you are struggling to pull a heavy load up a hill and you have a...
Sounds like you have the picture but lets expand on your statement "Wouldn't you need like 50 gears to do it?" because obviously you know that HP is NOT constant vs RPM.
For an apples to apples comparison, the number of gears required for optimum HP to the rear wheels depends upon the HP vs...
YA I knew that is what you meant and I was NOT criticizing you! I was just pointing out that "theory" is the wrong word to use in a "HIGHLY TECHNICAL" discussion.
No big deal though :-))
Many of you folks need to learn a little elementary physics!
Torque related to this discussion is a completely meaningless term!
Horsepower is the only factor that is used to calculate the rate of acceleration, hill climbing speed vs load and % grade etc.
So the posters that talk about...
You only made one minor mistake: NO they don't sound good "in theory" but instead only sound good in dreams of someone who knows nothing about physics.
The rest of what you said is exactly why we do not drive electric cars and also "Why They Killed The Electric Car"
While I was posting f95toli's post about down conversion idea is *very good* because you will have more dynamic range and the ability to sample for longer periods of time but you will probably have to do some custom hardware design. You will still need a lot of dynamic range to handle the...
HaHa - My advice of using a spectrum analyzer is probably not what you want if you are trying to play with Matlab to do the spectral analysis.
Before I retired 10 years ago Matlab was powerful program way back then and I used it for FFTs and DFTs of radar signals to analyze the doppler...
You need to use Google to learn a little about RF and specifically FM receivers.
The test instrument you need is a spectrum analyzer but they cost a bunch of bucks. An oscilloscope is basically useless for "measuring FM (89 to 110MHz) signals". The important FM signal processing takes place...
YA - Lots of little kiddies that actually believe the world owes them a free ride! Maybe they hope that someone will give them a big tip for "adding fries with that".
Everything you said is correct except for one potential scenario. If the client wireless card (or client USB) has very poor receive sensitivity or is getting jammed by interference(can't hear well) then the added WRT54 power will overcome this and range will increase. Of course high gain...
This is the third order that buy.com cancelled for me after a few days.
They have a new story now:
From: Support@Buy.com Add to Address Book
To: XXXXXXXX@yahoo.com
Subject: Apology eCoupon for Cancelled Item Attached.
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:25:53 -0700
Dear John,
We are...
Thanks! Would need a small USB 2.0 reader though.
"SanDisk has developed new, optimized CompactFlash cards that have a minimum sustained write speed of 9MB per second and a read speed of 10MB per second"
Link
Done! You seem to have a pretty good feel for the generalities of electronics and PSU design. You miss an occasional detail but we all do that.
By generic I meant no-name stuff and not the ones you suggested which to me are sort of "name brands". I buy mine on sales like this and use them in...
Per your request, an oversimplified analysis of that article by Ronald Dy Geronimo:
A charged capacitor will supply "reserve power" (constant current, not exponential decay) per this relationship:
T=V*C/I
T: time (seconds)
I: current (amps)
C: capacitance (farads)
V: volts
For a sample...
Baloney! Apex is quoting the rounded numbers from the Dell Spec and there is nothing wrong with that although he should have not have implied 2 place accuracy from 1 place input. I copied *your* calculation method exactly to 4 decimal places and the difference is over 2 in^2 using your method...
Your faulted calculations prove your premise!
If you are gonna be an effective wise guy you otta get it right.
The 20.1" monitor is 1600X1200 which is a width to height ratio 1.333...
You used this ratio for *BOTH* monitor area calculations.
However, the 18.1" monitor is 1280X1024 which is width...
Why do you presume to know what kind of current meter I use? One of my clamp on meters has 10 MHz Bandwidth and the current waveform is displayed/stored on a digital oscilloscope allowing a dynamic display of both voltage and current waveforms. So in fact it *is* that simple! You are correct...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.