Finally Intel made an actual good decision
https://videocardz.com/newz/next-gen-z890-motherboards-to-ship-with-intel-default-profile-enabled-by-default
i think you are wrong here cause cause AMD Reserves the Ram permanently unlike intel which only reserves like 128-256MB max everything else is shared pool which is dynamically allocated
The performance loss is too much vs the ram loss in VBS sometimes we have so many amazing programs from...
32GB should be fine for the target audience also for 64GB we need a denser memory die or larger package size in LNL to accomodate it and i agree with you
It is <redacted> people buy 8GB Ram MacBook air thin and light and max memory on air is 24GB iirc LNL has 32 GB
Please refrain from using profanity in the tech section. -Moderator Shmee
Btw TSMC cost is also offset due yo lagging node that is just running on equipment and depreciation all it costs is yhe cost of operations of the equipment Intel didn't do that they kep N,N-1 where N is latest now they are moving away they already mixed 14nm into Intel 16
On a side note
I don't...
Yup they reduced the pitches i don't know about EUV layers affect cost More layers means increasing cost that is why Intel 7 is a disaster it uses SAQP basically 4 time scanning and etching with DUV with EUV they would have gotten by single layer saving cost here is a good article...
Intel for it's Intent never uses HD they need to for their fab buisness but HPC is Intel's speciality also part of TSMC density is due to finflex allowing you to mix and match 2-2 2-1 fins that is what gives the density boost with tighter pitches 18 AP exists for this
Rumours yeah sure i can...
You mean comparable ? I don't understand people's problems with Intel Fab they got in that state due to BK and Swan BK gutted the funding and Swan didn't do anything after that to save it the only reason intel has such a scale is the fab do you know TSMC copied Intel untill intel F***** up good
Btw TSMC Said 18A is Comparable to N3P means superior to N3E but Intel 4 is closer to N4 and I3 is closer to N3B which makes Intel 18A closer to N2!!
Source
https://semiwiki.com/semiconductor-manufacturers/intel/314047-intel-4-presented-at-vlsi/
Lol why do you think they are betting big on fabs if they succeed at comparable PPA to TSMC every compititor is going to have an issue cause they can drive low end margin products out of market
I agree should be around 2-3W range but knowing windows :(
Is it the minimum or it can even below LNL has tiles as well it shows superiority of the packing tech they possess
Yes no doubt about ST perf and efficiency in ST and but in their wallet garden there is no way Intel/AMD could achieve Apple level performance until major changes in their arch
Ultra 9 get 130 not 132 127 would be the score at 5.0ghz for 130 considering the delta between OEM settings 124 is ok
I think all core power budget would be lower in multicore than in single core
Why are we getting disappointed for ST Lmao intel said U9 gets 130 i subtracted 2 points from it(Marketing Tax) and it is 2% faster than 268V so 126 for estimate it get's 124 still good my issue is MT it sucks unless it's on battery it's Thermal throttling rip
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.