I really like Parallels, but to be fair if I had had to have paid full price for it (I got rebates when I bought my Mac) I would have likely bought Fusion, just because I am familiar with the quality product that VMWare releases.
I had that crop up a week ago at the office here. I just rebooted a machine after an update.. bam!
Kept fiddling with it and the drive went belly up.
This may not be the case with you, but be careful.
I wasn't even speaking of gnome/kde etc. Those aren't part of the default 'userland' on most installs. I'm not even talking about XFree86 or Xorg. Just all the little utilities that go into making the default install what it is.
Check out the freebsd '/usr / src ' tree on FreeBSD to get...
Linux isn't an OS. It's a Kernel.
There in lay the problem.
Meaning:
Yes, the kernel has a relatively close eye kept on it. But what's comprised of the 'userland', is just a bunch of packages cobbled together.
*BSD the userland and the kernel come from the same source tree.
FTW.
It's an easy enough fix. Stretch it out to full size with Partition Magic or QT Parted. Windows (pre XP1 I believe) didn't address higher than 32bit LBA (127GB).
If I had to pick a fav Linux dist it would either be Slackware or Debian. I use Debian on a Sparc TI right now, and I've had a long history with Slackware in the past.
My favorite "free" distribution of all time is certainly FreeBSD. However. I'd gladly run it over Debian or Slackware...
Absolutely without a doubt the smartest thing I've ever seen anyone say on anandtech's forms.
But , truly if you were getting more ass than a toilet seat you wouldn't have 5 day interruptions, either. Toilets sure don't.
match up the standoff threading (fine thread, course thread) with the screws you have.
Dont use coarse thread screws on fine thread posts, and vice versa.
yawn. I was referring to your 'adult' abbreviations.
I didn't call you a S.O.B, or anything other than an incopetent boob (in a roundabout way). You're the one that went along and started dragging out the acronyms that shouldn't even have come into consideration.
Yeah I'm not entirely sure either. I can see the perfmon show IO spikes now and then and with process explorer it looks like csrss is causing the disk I/O.
Ok that's what I was figuring.
I've got high disc queue length on my MSSQL server even though nobody was on it this weekend. So I'm either going to set up Raid 0+1 to lower it, or keep my current mirror (Raid 1), and toss in two Raptors as Raid 0 and move the MDF(database) to the Raptors and...
I've been googling around, but can't seem to find a solid description.
I realise Nvidia's 0+1 requires 4 drives. 2 for striping and two for mirroring. However here is the question.
Are the mirrored drives just mirrors of disk0 and 1's stripe? Or is it a mirror of the complete data (times...
Make sure your system Isn't overclocked, I Know you wanted to run that 2500 at 3200, but drop it back down for now and run the install. Same for the ram, run default timings.
That's my suggestion... unless you've already tried that.
Also pull out any cards that you don't need. 3rd party...
Just to clarify I am the seller. The P/N on the box is PVT43AND. The P/N on XFX's webpage matches that. The PCI-E version is: PVT43GND
As I told my buyer (btbam), the card was unopened, in shrinkwrap. Which it still is, he hasn't opened it. My best guess is the box is the same box used...
What gets me is just the way people treat diseases. They chose to look away in most cases. All I'm getting at is nobody is DYING because RC5-64 can be cracked, nobody is DYING because the satellite array for SETI isn't getting attention. People die from cancer and all the other diseases that...
I realise it's their choice, but why not put forward some effort on something good like grid of F@H? Again RC5-64 took ages to break.. with thousands of computers working it. What did it prove? That you CAN crack it over a 3 year period. Joy.
Seti? I personally don't see a point.. but...
It's already been proven that RC5-64 took over 3+ years to 'crack' with many thousands of computers working on it. So, one single, or a handful of people trying to break whichever encryption they wish (bank software or whatever) is not likely to happen in any timeframe between system/encryption...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.