I'm not saying you aren't correct, but HOW would you know that only two people reported this accident? When you call it in, is it like calling the radio station when "lucky caller 17 wins.." "Hi, you're caller 11, try again!" After dispatch sends officers to the scene, do they update them every time someone calls? "Car #4758, we're up to 4 calls now." "Car #4758, we're up to 5 calls now."
I'm just curious how you know how many people reported the accident?
Because when we got back to the scene which was only about 20mins later, the police had not arrived where the victim was. I realized I said it was a "red jeep" when actually it was a green one. Also i got the full vehicle type and it's plate number. When I called in, they said between me and one other caller we were the only two that reported it, but the information I had gave was what allowed them to make a positive ID on the vehicle. The other caller did not want to provide any details really and she was a bit 'sensational' with everything so I don't think they trusted her credibility.
You left the scene of the accident. So, again, how do you know if no one stopped, or went around the block to return to the accident and gave a report? It was nice of you to call though, not that the employee should have had any trouble verifying his claim.
I explained above. I had to get somewhere by 6pm. This was all around 5:30-5:45pm. I followed the guy as he was heading the same direction as I was. Once he went into the shopping area (Costco) I turned down I-95 (if you would like the logistics it's the Costco in Lantana FL). I ran my errand and I came back to the victim in case they needed anyone to verify anything. At this point, I found out the other witness, was actually behind me following him as well and waited at Costco double parked behind his vehicle (by the time she got there he was already out of the car).
How do you know that the police knew that he was dui?
It's awesome that you were a good samaritan, and I truly wish more people would do that. But, you have so many extra details in this story - which require the suspension of major parts of the story - you're either lying, or you're one hell of a nosy busy body.
The police should have know to at least test him. Even the other lady thought it was bullshit they just let him go as long as they were able to follow him home. He was driving erratically and behaving like it. Like who just rams a vehicle out of their way because they cannot pass and then is all over the road?
After the cops got his information, they agreed to just take him home. She had thought they were going to literally take him home...the told him to back his car out slowly and do not let them out of his sight. The guy got in his car and the officer followed behind him.
She did not know if they knew him or if he was special, she agreed that he was either drunk or on something.
I think that is all the relevant details.