1,200 -- November 16, 2004 -- 608th day

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
This coming from someone who made claims about "specifics" in a different thread when he didn't even read the "specifics" supplied. ...

More diversions and lies from the Lyin' King. You provided exactly ONE specific example. It was crap, easily refuted by anyone with a room-temperature IQ.

I'm sure your link to some nut job religious site is wonderful, but I am not going to do your homework for you. I challenged you repeatedly to quote one or two other specific examples, both to support your continued slanders and to demonstrate that your link was worth reading. You kept refusing, repeating the same tired claims over and over without including even one additional quote or example. If your site had anything better than your first lame example, you should be able to quote it. That you continue to dodge this suggests the whole site is crap too. My guess is that you shot your load with your first stupid example, and now you have nothing left.

(If anyone cares, this is about the Kinsey thread.)

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Originally posted by: BBond
1,200 -- November 16, 2004 -- 608th day
All due to Bush's lies...

I believe that I will take a share in that Burden of the 1200 souls, if that is okay with you? After-all, I was part of the political process that put him into office. That being said, I believe that you were a part of the Political process that failed to remove him from office. Are you man enough to share the burden with me?

How on Earth can you expect the 56 million people who were stupid enough to vote against Bush to take responsibility for 59 million who voted for him?

I fixed your post and I have figured out that for you it is all about blame. It is so much more than that.
Now, In this country we operate on a political theory that we as a country select a president. After that we are one. That is our strength. If you want to tear that down, expect another countless 1200 soul milestones.

I have accepted my part in the responsibility for the deaths of the 1200 souls that you created a thread about, I would expect you and anyone with a spine to do the same. But I already know that you won't.

If you're going to quote another person's post don't do a Bush on it. It isn't ethical and I find it very offensive. Someone could mistake your words for the truth.

Ahhh, my words opposed yours, which were trolling, which makes them perfectly ethical. Now, about my challenge? Are you a spineless pos? Or are you willing to face your Demons for what they are?

Are you insane? I answered your 'challenge'. I can't be responsible for the utter stupidity of over 59 million Americans who chose to vote for Bush.

What next? Will this be like the Nixon second term where all of you deny voting for him?

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
I'm not diverting, I'm correcting your claims.
I have not accused Powell or Wolfowitz of lying - that is YOUR diversion.
The joint resolution sufficiently proves you are a liar when you make the claim that WMD was the "sole" justification.

"Any other "justification" was invalid on its face." - oh really? Who says? You? Buahahahaha Oh teh noesss - conjur says it's invalid so it must be. Whether or not you think it is valid is irrelevant. The FACT is that there were many justifications for removing Saddam. Just because you have an opposing opinion does not mean there were not multiple justifications.

Figure it out yet conjur?

CsG

As I wrote earlier, I figured you out months ago.

You have failed to provide any of the following:

1) Justification for the Iraq invasion was anything other than WMDs
2) Powell and Wolfowitz lied when they stated WMDs were the sole justification for the invasion
3) That I've lied


Now that I've thoroughly handed you your ass several times in this thread, I'm going to bed.

:roll: Nice try conjur but your diversion attempts don't change the facts. You don't get to decide that a justification doesn't count because you don't like it - the FACT is - it is there. Your continued refusal to face this fact just shows how irrational and illogical you've become.

CsG

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
I'm not diverting, I'm correcting your claims.
I have not accused Powell or Wolfowitz of lying - that is YOUR diversion.
The joint resolution sufficiently proves you are a liar when you make the claim that WMD was the "sole" justification.

"Any other "justification" was invalid on its face." - oh really? Who says? You? Buahahahaha Oh teh noesss - conjur says it's invalid so it must be. Whether or not you think it is valid is irrelevant. The FACT is that there were many justifications for removing Saddam. Just because you have an opposing opinion does not mean there were not multiple justifications.

Figure it out yet conjur?

CsG

As I wrote earlier, I figured you out months ago.

You have failed to provide any of the following:

1) Justification for the Iraq invasion was anything other than WMDs
2) Powell and Wolfowitz lied when they stated WMDs were the sole justification for the invasion
3) That I've lied


Now that I've thoroughly handed you your ass several times in this thread, I'm going to bed.

:roll: Nice try conjur but your diversion attempts don't change the facts. You don't get to decide that a justification doesn't count because you don't like it - the FACT is - it is there. Your continued refusal to face this fact just shows how irrational and illogical you've become.

CsG

It's only a flesh wound.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
This coming from someone who made claims about "specifics" in a different thread when he didn't even read the "specifics" supplied. ...

More diversions and lies from the Lyin' King. You provided exactly ONE specific example. It was crap, easily refuted by anyone with a room-temperature IQ.

I'm sure your link to some nut job religious site is wonderful, but I am not going to do your homework for you. I challenged you repeatedly to quote one or two other specific examples, both to support your continued slanders and to demonstrate that your link was worth reading. You kept refusing, repeating the same tired claims over and over without including even one additional quote or example. If your site had anything better than your first lame example, you should be able to quote it. That you continue to dodge this suggests the whole site is crap too. My guess is that you shot your load with your first stupid example, and now you have nothing left.

(If anyone cares, this is about the Kinsey thread.)

Try reading next time so you won't look like an ignorant fool. You have provided nothing to refute what I posted there - just ignorant claims. I provided a link to back up what I posted and you haven't even read it - yet you dismiss it. How nice.

Anyway - back to the Saddam apologist session already in progress...

CsG

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
I'm not diverting, I'm correcting your claims.
I have not accused Powell or Wolfowitz of lying - that is YOUR diversion.
The joint resolution sufficiently proves you are a liar when you make the claim that WMD was the "sole" justification.

"Any other "justification" was invalid on its face." - oh really? Who says? You? Buahahahaha Oh teh noesss - conjur says it's invalid so it must be. Whether or not you think it is valid is irrelevant. The FACT is that there were many justifications for removing Saddam. Just because you have an opposing opinion does not mean there were not multiple justifications.

Figure it out yet conjur?

CsG

As I wrote earlier, I figured you out months ago.

You have failed to provide any of the following:

1) Justification for the Iraq invasion was anything other than WMDs
2) Powell and Wolfowitz lied when they stated WMDs were the sole justification for the invasion
3) That I've lied


Now that I've thoroughly handed you your ass several times in this thread, I'm going to bed.

:roll: Nice try conjur but your diversion attempts don't change the facts. You don't get to decide that a justification doesn't count because you don't like it - the FACT is - it is there. Your continued refusal to face this fact just shows how irrational and illogical you've become.

CsG

It's only a flesh wound.

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Try reading next time so you won't look like an ignorant fool. You have provided nothing to refute what I posted there - just ignorant claims. I provided a link to back up what I posted and you haven't even read it - yet you dismiss it. How nice.

Anyway - back to the Saddam apologist session already in progress...

CsG

By the way, I take it as a high compliment when you keep calling me "ignorant" and "fool". It only confirms you don't have a leg to stand on; if you did, you'd use it.

"It's only a flesh wound." ROFL.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Try reading next time so you won't look like an ignorant fool. You have provided nothing to refute what I posted there - just ignorant claims. I provided a link to back up what I posted and you haven't even read it - yet you dismiss it. How nice.

Anyway - back to the Saddam apologist session already in progress...

CsG

By the way, I take it as a high compliment when you keep calling me "ignorant" and "fool". It only confirms you don't have a leg to stand on; if you did, you'd use it.

"It's only a flesh wound." ROFL.

Laugh away bowfinger. I'm sure you and BBond will sleep much better now after your little "session".

Oh, and I'm still waiting for something of substance from you in the kinsey thread.(but still not holding my breath)

CsG

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Try reading next time so you won't look like an ignorant fool. You have provided nothing to refute what I posted there - just ignorant claims. I provided a link to back up what I posted and you haven't even read it - yet you dismiss it. How nice.

Anyway - back to the Saddam apologist session already in progress...

CsG

By the way, I take it as a high compliment when you keep calling me "ignorant" and "fool". It only confirms you don't have a leg to stand on; if you did, you'd use it.

"It's only a flesh wound." ROFL.

Laugh away bowfinger. I'm sure you and BBond will sleep much better now after your little "session".

Oh, and I'm still waiting for something of substance from you in the kinsey thread.(but still not holding my breath)

CsG

That was a very satisfying session.


I think I'll have a cigarette.

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Laugh away bowfinger. I'm sure you and BBond will sleep much better now after your little "session".

Oh, and I'm still waiting for something of substance from you in the kinsey thread.(but still not holding my breath)

CsG

Oh, I am. You've become quite the self-parody.

Re. the Kinsey thread, if you're interested in discussion, you know what you need to do. I won't hold my breath, however. You've proven over the last few months that discussion is the last thing you want. For now, the ball's in your court. I contributed a thorough shredding of your lame example. You have yet to address it, or to supply new examples.

Nighty nite. Don't let the "perverts" bite.

 

[sandorski]

Bleh, quit feeding the troll.

 

[umbrella39]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
I've already provided the reasons you are wrong in what you keep claiming, you just can't/won't admit it yet - probably due to your blind rage hatred of Bush.

CsG

Wow...just..wow.

What is this proof you've provided in this thread? Your opinion? The White House page of the resolution passed by the Senate that I've already explained?

You've offered nothing.

And he will keep offering it, over and over and over. I don't think he understands that 100 times Zero is still zero.

You guys are a trip. You mean to tell me that after reading the joint resolution - you still think the "sole" justification was WMD? Your case of Saddam apologist is worse than I previously thought...

It's pathetic how much people's hatred of Bush has blinded them.

CsG

Slightly less pathetic than how much people's love of Bush has blinded them. He lied, people died, and co-signers are equally to blame.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
I'm not diverting, I'm correcting your claims.
I have not accused Powell or Wolfowitz of lying - that is YOUR diversion.
The joint resolution sufficiently proves you are a liar when you make the claim that WMD was the "sole" justification.

"Any other "justification" was invalid on its face." - oh really? Who says? You? Buahahahaha Oh teh noesss - conjur says it's invalid so it must be. Whether or not you think it is valid is irrelevant. The FACT is that there were many justifications for removing Saddam. Just because you have an opposing opinion does not mean there were not multiple justifications.

Figure it out yet conjur?

CsG

As I wrote earlier, I figured you out months ago.

You have failed to provide any of the following:

1) Justification for the Iraq invasion was anything other than WMDs
2) Powell and Wolfowitz lied when they stated WMDs were the sole justification for the invasion
3) That I've lied


Now that I've thoroughly handed you your ass several times in this thread, I'm going to bed.

:roll: Nice try conjur but your diversion attempts don't change the facts. You don't get to decide that a justification doesn't count because you don't like it - the FACT is - it is there. Your continued refusal to face this fact just shows how irrational and illogical you've become.

CsG

It's only a flesh wound.

Oh SNAP!

:laugh:

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: sandorski
Bleh, quit feeding the troll.

But it's fun to see Saddam apologist like conjur squirm. I'll take your suggestion under advisement though...

CsG

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: sandorski
Bleh, quit feeding the troll.

But it's fun to see Saddam apologist like conjur squirm. I'll take your suggestion under advisement though...

CsG

Saddam Apologists? I just don't see it..kind of like the vast quantities of WMD's

 

[Alistar7]

The price American has paid in the blood and bodies of our brave sons will always be worth what has been accomplished, 25,000,000+ people freed from brutal oppression. I am sure the families of the 400,000 innocent dead Iraqi citizens found in mass graves would agree.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: sandorski
Bleh, quit feeding the troll.

But it's fun to see Saddam apologist like conjur squirm. I'll take your suggestion under advisement though...

CsG

Saddam Apologists? I just don't see it..kind of like the vast quantities of WMD's

Did you read the thread? I've made it easier than that though - check out the bolded quote in my sig.

CsG

 

[smashp]

Originally posted by: Alistar7
The price American has paid in the blood and bodies of our brave sons will always be worth what has been accomplished, 25,000,000+ people freed from brutal oppression. I am sure the families of the 400,000 innocent dead Iraqi citizens found in mass graves would agree.

not to mention all the native americans that were killed so we could secure their freedom to build casinos.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: Alistar7
The price American has paid in the blood and bodies of our brave sons will always be worth what has been accomplished, 25,000,000+ people freed from brutal oppression. I am sure the families of the 400,000 innocent dead Iraqi citizens found in mass graves would agree.

What 400,000? The U.S. government estimates 300,000 and most of those were in attacks condoned or ignored by the U.S. Have you not been reading this thread?

Apparently not.

 

[kage69]

I believe that you were a part of the Political process that failed to remove him from office.

That is easily the stupidest thing I've read all morning (and after reading CAD's replies in this thread, that's saying a lot). You're actually expecting him to admit guilt for only having one vote? for you.

 

[OneOfTheseDays]

CAD, there is no shame in admitting that you are wrong or that you have been had by the Bush administration. Maybe you think your internet "status" will be diminished by doing so, but I assure you by continuing to repeat your failed argument your doing yourself no good in that regard.

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Alistar7
The price American has paid in the blood and bodies of our brave sons will always be worth what has been accomplished, 25,000,000+ people freed from brutal oppression. I am sure the families of the 400,000 innocent dead Iraqi citizens found in mass graves would agree.

What 400,000? The U.S. government estimates 300,000 and most of those were in attacks condoned or ignored by the U.S. Have you not been reading this thread?

Apparently not.

They have found 400,000 bodies, not an estimated 400,000 bodies. The US did not condone or ignore those kiled by Saddam, they were prevented from acting by the UN in the cease fire offered to Saddam in the Gulf War. If anyone condoned or ignored that round of genocide it was the UN.

 

[Alistar7]

Who is respnsible for the 10,000+ that died every month over 20+ years due to sanctions? Saddam was in control of the country, humanitarian aid was available.

 

[smashp]

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Alistar7
The price American has paid in the blood and bodies of our brave sons will always be worth what has been accomplished, 25,000,000+ people freed from brutal oppression. I am sure the families of the 400,000 innocent dead Iraqi citizens found in mass graves would agree.

What 400,000? The U.S. government estimates 300,000 and most of those were in attacks condoned or ignored by the U.S. Have you not been reading this thread?

Apparently not.

They have found 400,000 bodies, not an estimated 400,000 bodies. The US did not condone or ignore those kiled by Saddam, they were prevented from acting by the UN in the cease fire offered to Saddam in the Gulf War. If anyone condoned or ignored that round of genocide it was the UN.

provide a Source for this fact or a link to the talking point

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Alistar7
The price American has paid in the blood and bodies of our brave sons will always be worth what has been accomplished, 25,000,000+ people freed from brutal oppression. I am sure the families of the 400,000 innocent dead Iraqi citizens found in mass graves would agree.

What 400,000? The U.S. government estimates 300,000 and most of those were in attacks condoned or ignored by the U.S. Have you not been reading this thread?

Apparently not.

They have found 400,000 bodies, not an estimated 400,000 bodies. The US did not condone or ignore those kiled by Saddam, they were prevented from acting by the UN in the cease fire offered to Saddam in the Gulf War. If anyone condoned or ignored that round of genocide it was the UN.

Link?


BTW, the dead I'm referring to are the Kurds killed in 1988 and again in 1991 and the Shiites in 1991. All condoned or ignored by the U.S.