California homes are overpriced and overvalued. They also need to pipe in water and electricity from other states. In the event of a large-scale disaster or war, they're sunk. Overpopulation FTL.
Not entirely true.
To classify California as a whole is ignorant. Northern California (Bay Area) is much different from Southern.
Overpriced? In terms, somewhat. Quite frankly, you pay for what you get. There is a large job base, a variety of companies, and the weather is nothing short of Mediteranean.
It's SoCal that needs all the water, not NorCal.
Sure, I could afford a MUCH nicer home in another state, but is there a job market that's strong enough to support me? Not entirely.
People live here for the weather and culture. If culture isn't your thing, then at least acknowledge the weather. It's temperate year round. Even when we get a good "freeze" it lasts for a couple weeks at most (if we get them at all). It's dry,but not Arizona dry, if you want to go skiing, it's 3 hours away...if you want an ocean, it's usually 1 hour away.
Given the amount of people in the Bay Area versus the actual number of reasonably distant housing from work (combining the factors above), it's easy to see why housing is so expensive. I'm not saying that it's not overpriced, but I am saying that it's not as far off as people make it to be.
And as far as war and disaster? Who do you think they'll save first...the massive economy that is California? Or Billy Bob in Montana? Loma Prieta Earthquake, 1989... What, is Canada going to invade Washington, Oregon, and settle in California? Oh no! what about that pesky Chinese Army?
Do you think most states are independant of needs? The electricity you're suckling probably came from another state. Power tranmission isn't exactly a linear subject...