I'm still trying to figure out how voter ID plays into the insurrection of Jan 6, other than thru the big lie conspiracy theory of the stolen election.
So dishonest! You didn't bother to check the other link?
It doesn't. It's called straw grasping to support the big lie.I'm still trying to figure out how voter ID plays into the insurrection of Jan 6, other than thru the big lie conspiracy theory of the stolen election.
To be fair I'm against voter ID because it's a waste of time and money.It doesn't. It's called straw grasping to support the big lie.
BTW - To remind everyone Democrats are not against voter ID but they want ID everyone has or ID that is issued and fully paid by the state.
Example in Texas they allow CCW as voter ID but not student IDs. We all know why they are doing that.
Bill Clinton was also judged not guilty of the charges, but he did get a good blowjob out of it. Imagine having to put your dick in Hillary's mouth.So Bill Clinton did not lie about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky?
No he didn't. He was found not guilty of lying about it, which means he did not have sexual relations with her, at least according to imported_tajmahal.... he did get a good blowjob out of it ...
No he didn't. He was found not guilty of lying about it, which means he did not have sexual relations with her, at least according to imported_tajmahal.
Not according to taj. According to him if we say Clinton lied about it we are lying, because he was found not guilty by the Senate, the only thing that matters.Found not guilty of lying about it, or the conduct was gauged as insufficient to rise to the level of throwing him out of office.
That's why impeachment is a political and not strictly legal process.
Not according to taj. According to him if we say Clinton lied about it we are lying, because he was found not guilty by the Senate, the only thing that matters.
I just like seeing him squirm when asked if his standards apply to Democrats and Republicans equally. Strange how he won't say "Trump was found not guilty of the charges but he did do it" as easily as he says it for Clinton.Yes, well, he's inappropriately conflating impeachment with a criminal proceeding in court, and at least initially failing to distinguish "not guilty" from "innocent." All for reasons of political convenience.
I just like seeing him squirm when asked if his standards apply to Democrats and Republicans equally. Strange how he won't say "Trump was found not guilty of the charges but he did do it" as easily as he says it for Clinton.
Also Taj knows exactly what he’s doing and he doesn’t care that he’s a hypocrite. It’s not possible to shame someone when they don’t have any shame.You guys do realize it's child's play to catch him in politically motivated inconsistent reasoning, right? I don't reply to him for the same reason I don't play video games in God mode. It's like debating in God mode. No challenge. YMMV of course.
If an attempt to stop the current functioning government from transferring power to the next elected government isn't an insurrection, WTF is?Here's a nice article. Just in case some/most of you that haven't read anything or anyone that disagrees with your assessment of Jan. 6th. remember "an open mind is like a parachute, it only works when it's open" heh.
The January 6 Insurrection Hoax
Of course, it is absolutely critical to the Democratic Party narrative that the January 6 incident be made to seem as violent and crazed as possible. Hence the comparisons to 9/11, Pearl Harbor, and the Civil War. Only thus can pro-Trump Americans be excluded from “our democracy” by being...imprimis.hillsdale.edu
"Notwithstanding all the hysterical rhetoric surrounding the events of January 6, 2021, two critical things stand out. The first is that what happened was much more hoax than insurrection. In fact, in my judgment, it wasn’t an insurrection at all."
........................
"At the rally preceding the events in question, Donald Trump had suggested that people march to the Capitol “peacefully and patriotically”—these were his exact words—in order to make their voices heard. He did not incite a riot; he stirred up a crowd. Was that, given the circumstances, imprudent? Probably. Was it an effort to overthrow the government? Hardly.
I know this is not the narrative that we have all been instructed to parrot. Indeed, to listen to the establishment media and our political masters, the January 6 protest was a dire threat to the very fabric of our nation: the worst assault on “our democracy” since 9/11, since Pearl Harbor, and even—according to Joe Biden last April—since the Civil War! "
..................................................................
"In other words, to understand the January 6 insurrection hoax, you also have to understand that other long-running hoax, the Russia collusion hoax. The story of that hoax begins back in 2015, when the resources of the federal government were first mobilized to spy on the Trump campaign, to frame various people close to Trump, and eventually to launch a full-throated criminal investigation of the Trump administration."
Fun, fun. Reading different opinions is always a good experience. Right folks?
Well said. When people are filth, they have no shame. Shameless trash of the evil nature. Not the making dirty jokes nature. This defines the majority of the Trump party today.Also Taj knows exactly what he’s doing and he doesn’t care that he’s a hypocrite. It’s not possible to shame someone when they don’t have any shame.
Trump and the GQP are clearly trying to set up the overthrow of democracy in 2024 if he doesn't win a suppress democratic voter election.
It will be a coup via their installed election boards and officials and legislators, not via storming the Capitol a second time.
I'm not sure they'll be successful. But they are setting up to tryThey'll try, but we'll see if it works.
If you're so certain of this outcome, why waste time even talking about it? You should already be packing up your shit to GTFO when the time comes.
Look at poor little Skippy, having a fight with his eyes and ears when it comes to Jan 6Here's a nice article. Just in case some/most of you that haven't read anything or anyone that disagrees with your assessment of Jan. 6th. remember "an open mind is like a parachute, it only works when it's open" heh.
The January 6 Insurrection Hoax
Of course, it is absolutely critical to the Democratic Party narrative that the January 6 incident be made to seem as violent and crazed as possible. Hence the comparisons to 9/11, Pearl Harbor, and the Civil War. Only thus can pro-Trump Americans be excluded from “our democracy” by being...imprimis.hillsdale.edu
"Notwithstanding all the hysterical rhetoric surrounding the events of January 6, 2021, two critical things stand out. The first is that what happened was much more hoax than insurrection. In fact, in my judgment, it wasn’t an insurrection at all."
........................
"At the rally preceding the events in question, Donald Trump had suggested that people march to the Capitol “peacefully and patriotically”—these were his exact words—in order to make their voices heard. He did not incite a riot; he stirred up a crowd. Was that, given the circumstances, imprudent? Probably. Was it an effort to overthrow the government? Hardly.
I know this is not the narrative that we have all been instructed to parrot. Indeed, to listen to the establishment media and our political masters, the January 6 protest was a dire threat to the very fabric of our nation: the worst assault on “our democracy” since 9/11, since Pearl Harbor, and even—according to Joe Biden last April—since the Civil War! "
..................................................................
"In other words, to understand the January 6 insurrection hoax, you also have to understand that other long-running hoax, the Russia collusion hoax. The story of that hoax begins back in 2015, when the resources of the federal government were first mobilized to spy on the Trump campaign, to frame various people close to Trump, and eventually to launch a full-throated criminal investigation of the Trump administration."
Fun, fun. Reading different opinions is always a good experience. Right folks?
As soon as someone says or writes ‘Russia hoax’ you know they are either a hack or insane. Trump’s own son publicly confessed!Look at poor little Skippy, having a fight with his eyes and ears when it comes to Jan 6
I'm not sure they'll be successful. But they are setting up to try
Democracy without limits is a very bad thing. Give people the right to vote for whatever they want and they'll do it. Sometimes that works out, often times is doesn't.
Were any of those convicted of the Russian hoax? No, only the FBI agent that falsified documents.Isn't it just "your opinion" that the Russian investigation was just all a hoax, too!
Odd how your hoaxes land SO MANY people in jail for their crimes.
Paul Manafort
Rick Gates
Michael Cohen
Michael Flynn
George Papadopoulos
Alex van der Zwaan
Richard Pinedo
Sam Patten
Bijan Kian
Skim Alptekin
Roger Stone
Konstantin Kilmnik
Bijan Kian
Interesting how someone thinks anyone gives 1 twat hair about their attempt to reinvent history. The only History I think anyone cares for your ilk to try to reinvent is the History that is The Civil War....
Get back to us when you guys are ready to try to Rise again!!! The outcome will be the same. It's predetermined. Like how the cro magnon lost out.
Ask these fucking idiots... they won't be there to help you.
Capitol Breach Cases
www.justice.gov
Have, fun. Reading different opinions. I suggest taking a snack when you try to read this list, the list in MIGHTLY long!
Have a nice day
It's been long proven that it was not a hoax. Maybe you should actually go read the Muller report, or have someone read it and explain it to you, as you have problems reading and comprehending facts. You know, the report that the Courts say Barr Mislead the public on (and who you believed because Fox News shoved that lie down your throat), the very report that does not exonerate Trump by any means, and Muller testified to Congress indicating Trump as not innocent? The very report on the investigation that, all though Trump hide, destroyed, and blocked evidence, still didn't portray Trump as innocent. (there is a reason there are nearly a dozen instances of obstruction in that very report by Trump and his administration). There are other's who have also admitted to it (Trump Jr for instance). There are other federal agencies who have also reported as such. I know, facts you ignore and call fake news because it doesn't fit your lie.Were any of those convicted of the Russian hoax? No, only the FBI agent that falsified documents.
Ex-FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith pleads guilty to falsifying documents in Russia probe
Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith pleaded guilty on Wednesday to falsifying documents used to monitor 2016 Trump campaign aide Carter Page during a hearing in federal court in Washington. “At the …nypost.com
Nice try though. Also remember this :
"You can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you,"
Basically isn't this the first time we heard the so called "big lie"