Thanks for the stats Petrus, sounds like you had a good trip away
Web client shows 9900ppd. It's 2x Xeon X5355 (8x2.6 Ghz, old I know) with 8 gb and a GTX620. The card is low end, the computer is older and it is what it is. Got it free and threw it at this having never run FAH with any seriousness. Someday I'll throw some more parts at it. FSB is 533 so I can see why it's not as fast as it could be
Ah ok, that's the 'brother' of the Kentsfield, e.g. Q6600, I don't know if you saw a few posts back but I ran F@H briefly on my 2nd rig's CPU (Q9550 o/c 3.6 GHz, 12MB L2)), that was only getting ~1.2k ppd according to F@H ctrl!, so yea it seems our old Core 2 CPUs don't get many points .
It's FSB btw is at 424 MHz (aka 1696) vs your 333 MHz (aka 1333), so FSB doesn't seem to make a huge difference. Although what ppd is your CPU getting?
IIRC Penryn (Yorkfield) has a 10-15% performance advantage over Kentsfield.
For comparison, output of my
C2Q @3.6 GHz ~1.2k ppd
i7 4820k @3.9 GHz ~ 17.5k ppd! (that's only a 8.3% clock speed advantage, although it does have HT too)
But seeing as you got it for free that's good!