Ronin
Diamond Member
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
I agree. Rollo actually have the hardware, the personal experience unlike you people who just whine. It could be becasue of jealously, i dont know, but if i had the cash to spend heaps on PC hardware i would defitentely buy the latest end.
I actually read the whole interview, it was quite a while ago, but the nvidia engineer talked about why Nvidia simply chose SFR and AFR, why supertiling was ineffective (due to perforamnce loss of GPUs rendering over the suggested sqaure, e.g erendering over the line), why the connector was needed, and etc.
And anyhow SLi is different to 3DFX SLi.
Not really. SLI was borrowed from 3dfx SLI. NVidia ADDED things like AFR and SFR. SFR was really just a retooled scanline method.
If you look at ATI's MAXX solution, it has been a primarily AFR solution. If you build a multi gpu solution with from AFR and then back down, you will have better results than if you build your way up to AFR. SLI needs some improvement but I'm sure NV will continue reworking the AFR capabilities.
Crossfire technology is definitely superior to SLI. That's like a no contest. IF you don't believe it, look at how the % increase over 1 card is greater than the % increase for SLI.
But in any case, we should all be mad in some way that ATI took forever to get this out their door. So whether you're a fanboy of either company, you need to admit that Crossfire is great technology. It's just that ATI hasn't done the best job in competition.
Now on to R520...
Yeah, good for them. Only took them another year to implement. They're still sucking hind tit in the technology department, no matter how their implementation is now. I will say, however, that the results can't be ignored, but I think it's an issue of too little, too late, at this point.