$2000 for a Flatscreen TV a waste?

[imported_goku]

Originally posted by: sunase
Amusing comparing this thread to http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=38&threadid=1893404 . Where are all the "it's wrong to criticize" replies?

Because Philippine Mango is a douche? Or everybody hates him? I dunno, I don't mind him but thats the general trend on this forum.

 

[imported_goku]

Originally posted by: MrChad

Originally posted by: goku
To be honest, I'm not angsty, I'm just board stiff.

:Q TMI!

Hope you're jokin

 

[raptor13]

No.


Edit: I can't link.

 

[jagec]

Well, I bought a very nice car for $2100, which has been endless fun in ways that a TV never could be, so to each his own I guess.

 

[NaOH]

Buy whatever you want.

/thread

 

[n7]

Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Funny how flat on a woman is bad yet on a TV...

:roll:

Not true that flat on a woman is bad.

If you feel it is, i'm sorry for you.

 

[Rubycon]

Originally posted by: n7

Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Funny how flat on a woman is bad yet on a TV...

:roll:

Not true that flat on a woman is bad.

If you feel it is, i'm sorry for you.

Oh for crying out loud get a grip on LIFE and get some humor. And probably some balls because you must not have any.

 

[Kelemvor]

I'd get a projector for less and then you can have as big of a picture as you want.

 

[imported_goku]

Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
I'd get a projector for less and then you can have as big of a picture as you want.

Prob is, they run hot and, need a dark room due to the weak bulb.

 

[n7]

Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Oh for crying out loud get a grip on LIFE and get some humor. And probably some balls because you must not have any.

You need to add teh correct smiley so it's more obvious your comment was meant to be sarcastic, not serious.
:laugh: or or , for example.

As for balls, if me finding some flatter-chested women attractive make me not have any, then so be it

 

[0roo0roo]

well for one you should tell her a 26" crt cheap tv will not really be hdtv no matter what the label. its more like dvd+ resolution doesn't have the dot pitch to resolve anywhere that resolution. but u know how it is with marketing, if the beam scans 1080 times its "hdtv" regardless if it results in any visible detail heh

 

[Midlander]

Originally posted by: Blazin Trav

Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Funny how flat on a woman is bad yet on a TV...

please use :camera: in your posts so i can read it

Fixed