2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse

[NiKeFiDO]

remind me kinda of the newer Dodge Neons. But its still an improvement. Wonder if they fixed up the interiors from the crap they used to make

 

[Jejunum]

Originally posted by: Skoorb
It's a mitsubishi. Ergo, I'd rather walk.

oh yah definately . 350z < evo.

 

[GoingUp]

i like the old one better

 

[sniperruff]

Originally posted by: Rent

Originally posted by: sniperruff

Originally posted by: ironcrotch

Originally posted by: geno
I like it, but a fat, torquey *3.8L* V6 needs to be driving all 4 wheels, ala-GSX

A car that small with that much FWHP is silly

Yea, it would be more appealing if it were AWD or RWD, but I know the AWD is Evo territory now. So whats wrong with RWD? damn u mitsubishi!

making it RWD will make its tiny backseats virtually unusable at all. plus all you fast and the furious fanboys need to realize that the old turbo-charged GSX costed something around $27k. you can buy an Evo8 RS at that price.

How would it being RWD make the backseats unuseable? It might cramp the trunk a little, and you'd have to have a bump in the middle of the floorpan depending on the driveshaft layout, but in a sport compact thats the last freaking thing you care about.

You do realize that a GSX was basically the same drivetrain as a Evo right? It just had different suspension geometry and body panels. For the longest time, it was the closest thing we could get to a Evo in the States.

Cliffs notes : You are retarded.

your point being? you can now buy a freaking Evo8 RS for the same price with all wheel drive and a turbo 2.0 in a sedan form. why the hell would you want an eclipse GSX? idiot.

 

[geno]

Originally posted by: sniperruff

Originally posted by: Rent

Originally posted by: sniperruff

Originally posted by: ironcrotch

Originally posted by: geno
I like it, but a fat, torquey *3.8L* V6 needs to be driving all 4 wheels, ala-GSX

A car that small with that much FWHP is silly

Yea, it would be more appealing if it were AWD or RWD, but I know the AWD is Evo territory now. So whats wrong with RWD? damn u mitsubishi!

making it RWD will make its tiny backseats virtually unusable at all. plus all you fast and the furious fanboys need to realize that the old turbo-charged GSX costed something around $27k. you can buy an Evo8 RS at that price.

How would it being RWD make the backseats unuseable? It might cramp the trunk a little, and you'd have to have a bump in the middle of the floorpan depending on the driveshaft layout, but in a sport compact thats the last freaking thing you care about.

You do realize that a GSX was basically the same drivetrain as a Evo right? It just had different suspension geometry and body panels. For the longest time, it was the closest thing we could get to a Evo in the States.

Cliffs notes : You are retarded.

your point being? you can now buy a freaking Evo8 RS for the same price with all wheel drive and a turbo 2.0 in a sedan form. why the hell would you want an eclipse GSX? idiot.

I'd want one because 4 doors and an upright body look the suck compared to a low slunk sleek 2 door.

 

[randumb]

Originally posted by: Skoorb
It's a mitsubishi. Ergo, I'd rather walk.

Is the reliability on the Eclipse really that bad?

 

[StageLeft]

Originally posted by: Jejunum

Originally posted by: Skoorb
It's a mitsubishi. Ergo, I'd rather walk.

oh yah definately . 350z < evo.

Apparently sales numbers don't agree with that math of yours

 

[icejunkie]

Audi TT, Scion TC, Hyundai Tiburon hybrid!

 

[Rhin0]

girl car

 

[RbSX]

It looks like it's an audi TT with the read jacked up.. I like it more than the current model but I still think the 95-1999 generation is much cleaner.

 

[StageLeft]

Originally posted by: randumb

Originally posted by: Skoorb
It's a mitsubishi. Ergo, I'd rather walk.

Is the reliability on the Eclipse really that bad?

No, it's worse. Anyway, mitsubishi is a farce of a brand name, barely able to stay in business in North America, thanks to its asinine lending practices combined with substandard cars. Would you buy a car from a manufacturer that has a very real possibility of closing shop in the near future?

 

[BrokenVisage]

Originally posted by: bR
it looks ok... but i think it looks better than the current eclipse.

 

[Rent]

Originally posted by: sniperruff

Originally posted by: Rent

Originally posted by: sniperruff

Originally posted by: ironcrotch

Originally posted by: geno
I like it, but a fat, torquey *3.8L* V6 needs to be driving all 4 wheels, ala-GSX

A car that small with that much FWHP is silly

Yea, it would be more appealing if it were AWD or RWD, but I know the AWD is Evo territory now. So whats wrong with RWD? damn u mitsubishi!

making it RWD will make its tiny backseats virtually unusable at all. plus all you fast and the furious fanboys need to realize that the old turbo-charged GSX costed something around $27k. you can buy an Evo8 RS at that price.

How would it being RWD make the backseats unuseable? It might cramp the trunk a little, and you'd have to have a bump in the middle of the floorpan depending on the driveshaft layout, but in a sport compact thats the last freaking thing you care about.

You do realize that a GSX was basically the same drivetrain as a Evo right? It just had different suspension geometry and body panels. For the longest time, it was the closest thing we could get to a Evo in the States.

Cliffs notes : You are retarded.

your point being? you can now buy a freaking Evo8 RS for the same price with all wheel drive and a turbo 2.0 in a sedan form. why the hell would you want an eclipse GSX? idiot.

Coupe vs Sedan retard.

Heres another point for you while we're beating a dead horse to death. The Evo 8 has useable backseats WHILE having all of the associated hardware for a RWD vehicle (rear diff and driveshaft for starters).

 

[StageLeft]

If 260 HP can really be had for $20k, that's not bad. Unfortunately power alone doesn't sell a vehicle, which is why very few people are driving SRT4s. This will probably sell well through, especially to greasy white boys!

 

[CraigRT]

Definitely not bad... better than the current POS!

I don't know why they don't go back to a turbo design (4 cylinder) instead of a 6 though.

oh well!

 

[Actaeon]

It's a Mitsubishi.

Enough said.

 

[geno]

Originally posted by: Skoorb

Originally posted by: randumb

Originally posted by: Skoorb
It's a mitsubishi. Ergo, I'd rather walk.

Is the reliability on the Eclipse really that bad?

No, it's worse. Anyway, mitsubishi is a farce of a brand name, barely able to stay in business in North America, thanks to its asinine lending practices combined with substandard cars. Would you buy a car from a manufacturer that has a very real possibility of closing shop in the near future?

I don't know! Those incentives are REALLY tempting! *nudge nudge*

 

[n7]

I have liked every Eclipse, & i like this one too

 

[kevman]

only steers and queers like this car, steers can't post on ATOT so that about narrows it down.

 

[dudeman007]

WTF is wrong with some of you people. Idiots judge a car by the name. Mitsubishi isn't even a bad company, and the car looks great anyways.

 

[geno]

Originally posted by: dudeman007
Mitsubishi isn't even a bad company

Yeah! They're about to go out of business because...umm, they're a good company?

 

[RagingBITCH]

Originally posted by: dudeman007
WTF is wrong with some of you people. Idiots judge a car by the name. Mitsubishi isn't even a bad company, and the car looks great anyways.

Yea, b/c looks > reliability to 99% of car users.

 

[Apex]

1g > 2g > 4g > 3g

 

[JBT]

looks nice, Better than earilier versions.

 

[JeffCos]

263hp, 260lb ft torqueand a 6sp...you're damn right, i like it!!!