Muse
Lifer
- Jul 11, 2001
- 38,422
- 8,709
- 136
Oakland is OakTown, SF is "The City" around here.Who is calling San Francisco the City? I am only aware of Oaklanders calling themselves The City.
Oakland is OakTown, SF is "The City" around here.Who is calling San Francisco the City? I am only aware of Oaklanders calling themselves The City.
That kind of lunacy is prevalent in all American sports. Terrell Davis has 4 good seasons and quite a few bad ones after, but Broncos fans still clamor about him being in the HoF.
Saw official word that Bogut is out the rest of the Finals.
Pretty much everybody in the Bay area refers to San Francisco as "The City". Nobody in Oakland refers to Oakland as "The City", unless they are from out of town or something.
I thought you lived out here for awhile? :hmm:
Yeah, I did. It took me a while to understand this "hella" thing; I still don't get it.
Curry's MVP was based on the regular season, period. You're only proving one thing here, that you dislike GSW.Like I said before, Curry being MVP let alone unanimous MVP is still BS. In the playoffs, with Curry on the bench, GSW are +11, with Green on the bench they are -11. They beat Portland without Curry. GSW have tons of shooters to pick up any slack on shooting, without Green they wouldn't even get past the Thunder.
Like I said before, Curry being MVP let alone unanimous MVP is still BS. In the playoffs, with Curry on the bench, GSW are +11, with Green on the bench they are -11. They beat Portland without Curry. GSW have tons of shooters to pick up any slack on shooting, without Green they wouldn't even get past the Thunder.
No, I don't hate them, Curry should not have been MVP let alone the first unanimous.Curry's MVP was based on the regular season, period. You're only proving one thing here, that you dislike GSW.
It was obvious to me from the hyperextension that he's out for the Finals. I also questioned whether that even hurts or helps the Warriors. He's good for a blocked shot or two each game, but otherwise gets abused by quicker players who drive at him. His offense is usually non-existent. One thing I've wondered is if the Dubs would not be a better team if they started the "Death Line-up" and played it heavy minutes every game.Well, Bogut was pretty much an afterthought in the 2015 Finals. He's been pretty much a sometime player the last couple years, gets injured a lot.
OK you don't hate them, you're just an idiot.No, I don't hate them, Curry should not have been MVP let alone the first unanimous.
No, I don't hate them, Curry should not have been MVP let alone the first unanimous.
No, I don't hate them, Curry should not have been MVP let alone the first unanimous.
That's fine I'll be an idiot. I've been saying it before the playoffs, he's not the MVP of the league, playoffs or regular season. I just know what MVP truly means.It was obvious to me from the hyperextension that he's out for the Finals. I also questioned whether that even hurts or helps the Warriors. He's good for a blocked shot or two each game, but otherwise gets abused by quicker players who drive at him. His offense is usually non-existent. One thing I've wondered is if the Dubs would not be a better team if they started the "Death Line-up" and played it heavy minutes every game.
OK you don't hate them, you're just an idiot.
That's fine I'll be an idiot. I've been saying it before the playoffs, he's not the MVP of the league, playoffs or regular season. I just know what MVP truly means.
That's fine I'll be an idiot. I've been saying it before the playoffs, he's not the MVP of the league, playoffs or regular season. I just know what MVP truly means.
Oh man, are we going to get one of those "superior basketball knowledge" moments?
Tell us: what does MVP of the regular season truly mean?
The question that arises here is do you consider the MVP to be the player that had the best season, or the player that was the most integral to their team? If anyone claims that Curry didn't have the best season, they're a liar or ignorant. Trying to come up with a "not best player but most integral to team" argument is difficult though because there can be a player that was extremely valuable but on a bad team. And no matter how valuable to a team a player was this season, nobody played as well as Curry.
Well, Bogut was pretty much an afterthought in the 2015 Finals. He's been pretty much a sometime player the last couple years, gets injured a lot.
You're only proving one thing here, that you dislike GSW.
Oh man, are we going to get one of those "superior basketball knowledge" moments?
Tell us: what does MVP of the regular season truly mean?
They did basically win two playoff series without him. Would Cleveland win one game without Lebron, let alone 8 of them?
I do sort of understand Lebron's comment about the selection. Most impressive player vs. most important.
They did basically win two playoff series without him. Would Cleveland win one game without Lebron, let alone 8 of them?
I do sort of understand Lebron's comment about the selection. Most impressive player vs. most important.
MVP is also a popularity contest. The league needs new blood to sell jerseys.
They didn't give Jordan the MVP 10 years in a row for the same reason.
Yes, Lebron is MVP every year, but that gets old.