LeBron has been playing in a historically weak East for so long and the fact that he's 2-4 in the NBA Finals will keep him out of overtaking Jordan unless he goes crazy and wins the next 4.
How much weaker is the east compared to when Jordan was playing? Yeah, I think it was stronger, because there were some great teams, but each one of those was relatively short-tenured compared to the Bulls. First that come to mind:
Celtics, obviously (the legit and only team better than Jordan's great Bull's teams, imo....though they were only great before Jordan became great)
Pistons. 2 amazing years with Lambert and Rodman and Zeke and the others, and rather solid when Hill came around, but nowhere near the contenders the Bulls needed.
Knicks. Jordan probably the only reason Ewing never won a ring, but it's not like the majority of those very good Knick teams were truly special. Some of them were very good, though.
That weird year with Orlando....was that the year Jordan was "retired"?
Heat. Probably the only other competitive team, near the end of Jordan's tenure, but they were never really better than the Knicks of those same years, either.
....OK, I get your point. I would imagine that is still more competitive than what exists today. More competition then, even though one team was still incredibly dominant. Basically, today you have one guy moving from one team to the next which essentially determines which team will dominate that half of the league. sad.
Oh but don't forget: The Cavs once lost to a really shitty team this year and the Warriors also lost to a shitty team...therefore there is real parity! Sp33dy says so.