Thanks bro for letting us know how cool you are bro.Pats vs Eagles, ugg guess I don't need to watch the Super Bowl this year.
thats ok broPats vs Eagles, ugg guess I don't need to watch the Super Bowl this year.
Flyers fans HATE the penguins.Fans of Da Iggles will sometimes dislike Steelers fans and their smugness but not generally the Steelers team.
You know, that was over-hyped. Apart from anecdotes of stupidity, which you can always find, statistically there were only 6 arrests all day and night citywide, and that included 3 for scalping.The videos of the classy Philly fans are amusing. Got me thinking I should root for the Pats now anyway
Kinda meh? You don't think Carson Wentz is exciting? He makes me wet with fanboi admiration!They're kinda meh nowadays but back in the 90s watching the Eagles was fun because of Randall Cunningham.
Kinda meh? You don't think Carson Wentz is exciting? He makes me wet with fanboi admiration!
Despite "standing on the sidelines" for the last three games, he still nearly led the entire league in TD passes, placing second by only one to Russell Wilson.Yeah, I really get excited watching him standing on the sidelines with his clipboard.
Decent mobility? Wentz is not a poor man's anything! While leading his team to the best record in the league he was right up there for MVP consideration. And, yeah, stats aside, he is damn exciting to watch.And yeah, he has decent mobility and can avoid pressure like a rich man's Alex Smith or poor man's Steve Young.
Pardon me, but your ignorance is showing. You literally don't know what you're talking about. I was here for the Randall show, and I've been privileged to be here for the Carson Wentz show, and let me tell you, this season Wentz and the plays he makes are always the prime topic amongst the faithful after a Birds game. You trying to claim otherwise is laughable and lame.But nobody is going to have the first sports-related question on Monday morning be "so what did Wentz do in his game" like folks would always ask about guys like Randall.
I know that's the conventional wisdom, and, believe me, I understand why. All the time I was watching the Jags game I was thinking Brady would do exactly what he did. But, time out before you anoint them SB winners. One thing I know, the Birds are not going to play ultra-conservative and scared with a lead like the Jags did.The Pats will mail it in, keeping it close all game then, (suprise, suprise), winning on a strong finish . Eagles' fans will have something to take away: "We did not roll over!"
(Not an Eagles fan) Although Wentz's completion percentage is not elite, he was actually considered the MVP front-runner when he got injured. His advanced stats compare quite well to the probable winner (Tom Brady).Yeah, I really get excited watching him standing on the sidelines with his clipboard. And yeah, he has decent mobility and can avoid pressure like a rich man's Alex Smith or poor man's Steve Young. But nobody is going to have the first sports-related question on Monday morning be "so what did Wentz do in his game" like folks would always ask about guys like Randall. Maybe that's an impossibly high standard to hold him to, and maybe it's just plain unfair to expect. But still, Da Iggles still aren't must-see TV like the Jordan-era Chicago Bulls were for example. Or the current day Pats are, even though many of those watching them are hoping they fail.
You never need to watch it. It's entirely voluntary.Pats vs Eagles, ugg guess I don't need to watch the Super Bowl this year.
Yea, I've looked at it several times since it happened, it looks looked he was trying to lead with the shoulder and just missed, I don't buy that going high is the only option to tackle someone though.I don't think there was an intention to injure Gronk. I don't think head to head was intended, I think it was accidental, based on the replay. In addition to watching the replay closely, you have to realize that anyone doing a head to head contact is endangering himself as much as the other guy.
To an extent, I agree, but then again we will never see another dynasty in the NFL like we've seen with the Pats, it's just not set up for it to happen. I also like Philly's chances in the SB, Peterson has done a great job of getting Fowles into his comfort zone and the Pats do not have as good a defense as Minnesota.The same people team winning over and over again in sports gets boring. The same thing that is happening now with the Golden State Warriors.
Yea, the "miracle" is gonna end with a harsh bit of reality in Philly, can't turn the ball over twice and expect to win very often, Foles is also playing very well tonight.
So don't blame the one team stepping up to the plate and winning all of the time, blame the lamers always falling short and losing all of the time.The same people team winning over and over again in sports gets boring. The same thing that is happening now with the Golden State Warriors.
Yea, agree, as a Pats fan I'll have to say Philly looks damm impressive indeed, if Bortles can hang 300 on the NE defense Foles should find success as well, both Butler + Gilmore gave up chunk plays at home as well. I think a lot depends on which team finds a groove first as well.Shows that when you try to "make" a big moment it usually fails hard.
Would have rather seen Brees/Saints in this game although I suspect the end result would have been the same.
I find the Warriors boring in general because of all the 3's they shoot. I just don't find it entertaining when there is a 2 on 1 fast break and they kick it out to someone behind the arch for a 3.
thats ok bro
the ONLY reason im watching it is because the Pats are in it