'Morning Guys.
I'm not sure why my SANDRA scores are so much lower than yours...maybe b/c my memory isn't as tweaked as it could be? Dunno.
But some good news; I just stopped P95. Almost 12 hours straight w/no errors. 12 hours is good enough for me (and most folks, I'd assume!) I even did a bit of light gaming while it was running. That's good news. 2.23GHz. Now that I've found a sweet spot to "come back to", I am planning on messing with it even further.
I do need a better videocard. I tried enabling 4xAA on Max Payne yesterday and my rig got choppy. Now, at 1152x864x32 w/all details maxed and triple buffering, it looks positively beautiful and runs smoother than glass...but I still want my AA, darnit!
I'm going to shut down all background proggys and run SANDRA again. BRB.
*edit*
CPU: 6140/3068
Multimedia: 12109/14194
Memory: 2829/2662
Still very good scores, my memory scores are right there w/you guys, but the CPU is nowhere near yours. It's the bottom-line CPU speed that "gets the math score", not the multiplier, right? I don't get it. It's gotta be the memory tweaking timings? I'm running everything set to "Expert", CAS2, timings of 4-3-2 (I believe...may be 4-3-4, I'll check...but it shouldn't make THAT much of a diff...)
Oh, and MechBgon, that was a very subtle, polite subliminal message. I'll think about it.