2200+ preserved fetuses found at deceased abortion doctor's home

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Mar 11, 2004
23,177
5,641
146
I can only assume he was planning on letting nutjobs like the OP and glenn "adopt" them, these anti-abortion people will probably pay big money since they think they're sacred. Or maybe he sells them to Catholic priests, which doesn't consider them to be real humans (and would be stuck in purgatory and not be able to get into heaven), to deal with their urges. Basically Catholic versions of fleshlights.
 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,084
1,505
126

"After World War I, Sanger increasingly appealed to the societal need to limit births by those least able to afford children. The affluent and educated already limited their child-bearing, while the poor and uneducated lacked access to contraception and information about birth control.[110] Here she found an area of overlap with eugenicists.[110] She believed that they both sought to "assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit." They differed in that "eugenists imply or insist that a woman's first duty is to the state; we contend that her duty to herself is her duty to the state."[111] Sanger was a proponent of negative eugenics, which aimed to improve human hereditary traits through social intervention by reducing the reproduction of those who were considered unfit.[6] "



Also, it is historical fact that she spoke at a KKK meeting. I wouldn't have done that, but then again I am not a racist. She wished to stop birth of those that were "unfit."
And much like you, she was against abortion. But she didn't speak at a Klan meeting because she supported them, she in fact denounced their racist cause. But she understood the concept that even people you find deplorable still need to hear your message sometimes. Much like how we all know you're unable to learn, but we still try to reach you and help you enter modern society.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
At least 2,200+ dead children and the lefties in here wish he'd killed more. in the name of reproductive rights of course.
 

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
Probably did not have the heart to let them be incinerated as medical waste.
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,007
572
126





I always wondered what kind of human being would be an abortion doctor. But then again, throughout history someone has always had to be the executioner, the hangman.

Hangmen and executioners generally can do their jobs with some sense of moral clarity, as they are following through with the sentence imposed by the justice system, right or wrong, on hopefully a man guilty of heinous crimes. If they accidentally kill an innocent man, it is first the fault of the state, not the executioner.

Abortion deliberately and needlessly kills an innocent human being. There is no possibility of a guilty party. Furthermore monstrous men like these revel in the bloodletting, and that is not unheard of in abortion doctors.

Please dont equate the two.
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
58,552
12,865
136
Hangmen and executioners generally can do their jobs with some sense of moral clarity, as they are following through with the sentence imposed by the justice system, right or wrong, on hopefully a man guilty of heinous crimes. If they accidentally kill an innocent man, it is first the fault of the state, not the executioner.

Abortion deliberately and needlessly kills an innocent human being. There is no possibility of a guilty party. Furthermore monstrous men like these revel in the bloodletting, and that is not unheard of in abortion doctors.

Please dont equate the two.
Oh, shut up.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Hangmen and executioners generally can do their jobs with some sense of moral clarity, as they are following through with the sentence imposed by the justice system, right or wrong, on hopefully a man guilty of heinous crimes. If they accidentally kill an innocent man, it is first the fault of the state, not the executioner.

Abortion deliberately and needlessly kills an innocent human being. There is no possibility of a guilty party. Furthermore monstrous men like these revel in the bloodletting, and that is not unheard of in abortion doctors.

Please dont equate the two.


Yea, I agree, I was just getting at people that actively kill other human beings as their job. But yes, you are correct, executioners were more like the hands of justice whereas abortion doctors are more along the lines of Josef Mengele.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,699
6,196
126
Anybody who has ever been to a doctor or who was born in a hospital has either had his life imposed on or elected to apply his own conscious will to subvert natural processes and has thus sinned against God in the same way as mothers who elect to abort. Who lives and dies is either subject to human conscious choice or must live or die without any intervention with the will of God.

Pro life people are hypocrites who intervene in the natural course of events every day when it’s their lives at stake while denying the same choice to others. Who are they to say to others what conscious choices they are morally obliged to make. Clearly, when a pro life person extends their stay on Earth it is a moral sin. Such people are scum and worthless. Judge not or invite reciprocation.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Anybody who has ever been to a doctor or who was born in a hospital has either had his life imposed on or elected to apply his own conscious will to subvert natural processes and has thus sinned against God in the same way as mothers who elect to abort. Who lives and dies is either subject to human conscious choice or must live or die without any intervention with the will of God.

Pro life people are hypocrites who intervene in the natural course of events every day when it’s their lives at stake while denying the same choice to others. Who are they to say to others what conscious choices they are morally obliged to make. Clearly, when a pro life person extends their stay on Earth it is a moral sin. Such people are scum and worthless. Judge not or invite reciprocation.


Being born in a hospital is the same thing as being aborted in the eyes of your god. Got it Moonie. Is taking a life saving antibiotic the same as shooting someone to death, too?
 

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
6,572
7,823
136
Here's The story from 2016 on the hearing at which his license was suspended. He certainly seems to have been rather unprofessional in some of his medical practices, although he never lost a patient, and it's worth noting that the investigation into his practice was started at the behest of two right-to-life organizations.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,699
6,196
126
Being born in a hospital is the same thing as being aborted in the eyes of your god. Got it Moonie. Is taking a life saving antibiotic the same as shooting someone to death, too?
If the application of conscious choice is to be preferred over blind submission to the laws of nature a moral judgment has been made as to the appropriateness of that decision. Since, as in the case of abortion where there is only one conscious individual to make such a conscious decision, the morality of that right to all who exercise it with respect to themselves is automatically granted. It then becomes simply a matter of opinion as to whom and when that right to decide is given. Thus, to say that pro life people should not be given any right to consciously apply any consciously derived technique to sustain their lives, becomes a moral equivalent to banning abortion. Since pro live people are very active in denying others their rights, the moral choice to make illegal any conscious option they themselves might have to extend their lives through modern medicine, etc., makes perfect sense based on receprocity. Don't apply hypocritical moral judgments to others if you don't want them coming back at you.

When you suggest that killing another person is the equivalent of killing a fetus what you are not saying but should be saying is that you would do exactly the same thing by preserving the live on an unconscious being by destroying the rights of the mother to control her body. What is freedom if you have no control over self. It is slavery. That's the price you would exact for your moral faith. And so in that respect your morality isn't really moral at all. And this is why every secular court that abides by the will of the people will always rule against you. This is one big reason why conservatives try to pack the courts. Real courts, courts that reflect logic and reason, secular science and social justice, will never agree with your position. It's not only immoral but dangerous. You are simply morally undeveloped and selfish but have built an ego around the thought that you represent a truth that is nothing more than low level thinking.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
56,001
14,528
146

Curiously, all those laws came AFTER Roe v. Wade. Every last one of them.

Before the women's suffrage movement, abortion was completely unregulated and normal. Even the bible equates an pregnancy loss due to criminal assault to property loss and not human life.

Opposition to abortion started as a way to control women and directly correlates with the first women's suffrage movements in the 1800s. Before that NO western or Christian nation had any laws or regulations on termination of pregnancies.

Once Roe V. Wade passed, states started making laws protecting fetuses is other ways to make a point with the end game being the outlawing of abortion and control of women's bodies.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
Curiously, all those laws came AFTER Roe v. Wade. Every last one of them.

Before the women's suffrage movement, abortion was completely unregulated and normal. Even the bible equates an pregnancy loss due to criminal assault to property loss and not human life.

Opposition to abortion started as a way to control women and directly correlates with the first women's suffrage movements in the 1800s. Before that NO western or Christian nation had any laws or regulations on termination of pregnancies.

Once Roe V. Wade passed, states started making laws protecting fetuses is other ways to make a point with the end game being the outlawing of abortion and control of women's bodies.


I'm sure the aborted female fetuses would agree... they wouldn't want someone else controlling their body, their lives.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
56,001
14,528
146
I'm sure the aborted female fetuses would agree... they wouldn't want someone else controlling their body, their lives.

They don't care. They can't feel anything. They are not human yet.

The vast majority of abortions, and virtually all elective abortions happen in the first trimester.

But keep making emotional pleas about "life." Because we know the only life you give a shit about is the unborn. Once they're born they can fuck right off.

Abortion opposition has always been about control of women. The emotional plea to life is a ploy.
 
Reactions: Victorian Gray

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
37,995
18,344
146
They don't care. They can't feel anything. They are not human yet.

The vast majority of abortions, and virtually all elective abortions happen in the first trimester.

But keep making emotional pleas about "life." Because we know the only life you give a shit about is the unborn. Once they're born they can fuck right off.

Abortion opposition has always been about control of women. The emotional plea to life is a ploy.

He will next tell us that overpopulation is the real problem, and having more unwanted births is the solution.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Yea, I agree, I was just getting at people that actively kill other human beings as their job. But yes, you are correct, executioners were more like the hands of justice whereas abortion doctors are more along the lines of Josef Mengele.

Youbetcha

 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |