Thats great . Make sure all 4 cores are running and don't do vid until Prime has run for at least 4 yours . If that cpu can do that I will happly trade you mine +$100.
tell me how to post the pic, i can show you. I am recording vd now, will post on youtube later.
Thats great . Make sure all 4 cores are running and don't do vid until Prime has run for at least 4 yours . If that cpu can do that I will happly trade you mine +$100.
Offset of +.5 or +.05? +.5 is way too much.Here is a little update on my endeavors. I just tried OC'ing to 5ghz and it posted. I upped my offset from -.100 on a 4.5ghz OC to +.5 for the 5 ghz. It posted, and ran three instances of IBT before it blue screened.
Here are some information on how IBT went: (I did not take a screen shot because I was waiting for it to succeed first, which it never did)
Temps: Averaged in the mid 80's
Vcore: Was using 1.34v when IBT was running.
IBT: Ran for 3 correct tests and then blue screened during the 4th
Do you guys think I should up my offset and see if I can get it to be stable? It is already running pretty hot...
Offset of +.5 or +.05? +.5 is way too much.
On my ASRock board, it has auto overclock values from 4GHz to 4.8GHz.
When it is set to 4.8GHz the voltage offset is +.095, 4.6GHz uses +.075.
Right now I am using the Auto 4.6GHz overclock.
Have ran IBT with 100 runs and Custom 12000MB set. No BSOD and took about 13 hours for it to do the 100 runs. Have also done Prime Small and In-Place for 24 hours with no BSDO. That tell me the system is very stable. If IBT crashes after 3 runs or Prime crashes after a few hours, the system isn't stable.
Use the validation feature that CPU-Z has and publish it online. Keep the URL to your validation page as proof.I want to post some last definitive proof to show that my OC is valid.
Settle down . Your taking it to personnal. Does it really matter what anyone else believes . As long as you know its the truth don't take it so hard. Its not like your spaming. The people here are more open minded . Its likely you got a great batch and center chip off the waffer.
Use the validation feature that CPU-Z has and publish it online. Keep the URL to your validation page as proof.
....
Since I cannot post there anymore I wanted to ask you guys what other proof I could provide to show that my OC is valid and stable? .
Strange comment is strange. Are you going to give him 300 dollars ?you can get 300 bucks for this chip if it will boot,just boot windows with a 55x multy.
try and set vcore to 1.55 and see how high it will boot into windows.Im betting you have a 54-56x multy chip here and will hit 6ghz with the right cooling.
DO NOT run it under any load at that voltage and just see if you can get into windows at 55x
Strange comment is strange. Are you going to give him 300 dollars ?
Here is the closed thread at TH, the comment got me interested.
Okay, I have a thread about this over at Tom's Hardware as well and it was closed because I started getting flamed with posts saying that I am lying, and that I am photoshopping my screen shots.
Since I cannot post there anymore I wanted to ask you guys what other proof I could provide to show that my OC is valid and stable? I PMed the MOD to open up the thread again, so if he does open it up again I want to post some last definitive proof to show that my OC is valid. All of the pictures I posted here, I posted there. So, I do not get how you guys accept it as valid and on the thread over there I am getting flamed.
I wouldn't state it that way.
Over here, flaming will get you sanctioned by the mods because it is a violation of our posting guidelines. As is thread-crapping.
So what you see here is a situation where there are going to be some folks equally suspicious of your claims (because until you provide proof, they are just unproven claims) as are the folks at Tom's, but the folks here know better than to flame you or start thread-crapping in your thread.
To put it differently, we are obligated to afford you the freedom of remaining blissfully ignorant if that is what you steadfastly (or stubbornly as some members prove out) insist on doing.
Personally I don't believe anyone's claims as legit until I see a screenshot of their rig fully loaded with LinX, displaying CPUz and Realtemp, and LinX shows that it has already passed >10 cycles with loads and loads of ram (the ALL ram option) being used.
Anything less is just someone trying to skate by with a semi-stable rig that for obvious reasons is not comparable to everyone elses LinX stable OC's. Where things get interesting is when we have members who claim to have super-chips but then they refuse to post up such screenshots...
Strange comment is strange. Are you going to give him 300 dollars ?
Here is the closed thread at TH, the comment got me interested.
so can you boot into windows at 55-56x?
Haven't tried. Tried 5ghz and I booted and ran IBT 3 times before it died on me, but I have not tried 55x or higher yet.
What was your Vcc for that run? And what was the max peak temp on any given core before it crashed?
You have a good chip, but low voltage chips are over-rated imo. Your chip at 1.18v runs at hot as mine does as 1.35v, and I only use push with a h100. My Q6600 was a low voltage clocker, but I couldn't push it above 1.35v where it ran 3.6ghz, because any more and it ran too hot. Most others who ran 3.6 did it at 1.45v where they had similar temps to me.
But at least you don't have to worry about electromigration. Have fun with it!
You have a good chip, but low voltage chips are over-rated imo. Your chip at 1.18v runs at hot as mine does as 1.35v, and I only use push with a h100. My Q6600 was a low voltage clocker, but I couldn't push it above 1.35v where it ran 3.6ghz, because any more and it ran too hot. Most others who ran 3.6 did it at 1.45v where they had similar temps to me.
But at least you don't have to worry about electromigration. Have fun with it!