Man oh man are you going to be mad when you learn what Trump's been up to in Ukraine.
Sorry, but no. What you are trying to do is re characterize his abuse of power by saying "he only used to influence to remove the prosecutor who was going after my sons "consulting" company paychecks, which would have shown a light on the Bindens (again). Besides, other countries wanted the prosecutor removed because he simply was not tough enough on crime."
You dont get to use your power to remove a foreign prosecutor who is looking into corruption because he is not to your liking, especially when he threatens your personal interests in that same country!
You really have no actual clue of what happened in Ukraine with the prosecutor do you? Like even a little bit.Sorry, but no. What you are trying to do is re characterize his abuse of power by saying "he only used his influence to remove the prosecutor who was going after my sons "consulting" company paychecks, which would have shown a light on the Bindens (again). Besides, other countries wanted the prosecutor removed because he simply was not tough enough on crime."
You dont get to use your power to remove a foreign prosecutor who is looking into corruption because he is not to your liking, especially when he threatens your personal interests in that same country!
Sorry, but no. What you are trying to do is re characterize his abuse of power by saying "he only used his influence to remove the prosecutor who was going after my sons "consulting" company paychecks, which would have shown a light on the Bindens (again). Besides, other countries wanted the prosecutor removed because he simply was not tough enough on crime."
You dont get to use your power to remove a foreign prosecutor who is looking into corruption because he is not to your liking, especially when he threatens your personal interests in that same country!
that's why I asked for them to prove ONE charge that has been filed, which they cannot.I don't now why you guys respond to this guy...This post here tells us he has no interest in learning the facts. Just the Trump playbook - perpetuate the smear
For an applicant without political connections, an age waiver for a direct commission is very rare, even more so for someone with a history of drug abuse.A waiver for a prior drug incident is not even remotely uncommon. In fact I would say it's almost the rule rather than the exception. Why is your first thought to go to some corrupt motive without even bothering to learn about what you're talking about? Do you have a single shred of evidence to support your assertion?
Also as far as an OTH for drug use goes it would certainly be an obstacle for government service but for someone who already had a long career in lobbying and finance and things like that I doubt it would matter. After all they are all up to their ears in cocaine so the drug use itself would be irrelevant - they would only care about the possible damage to their reputation and I suspect Biden's name and connections far outweighed that.
For an applicant without political connections, an age waiver for a direct commission is very rare, even more so for someone with a history of drug abuse.
I'll make it easy on you. Pick ONE
Sorry, but no. What you are trying to do is re characterize his abuse of power by saying "he only used his influence to remove the prosecutor who was going after my sons "consulting" company paychecks, which would have shown a light on the Bindens (again). Besides, other countries wanted the prosecutor removed because he simply was not tough enough on crime."
You dont get to use your power to remove a foreign prosecutor who is looking into corruption because he is not to your liking, especially when he threatens your personal interests in that same country!
That so called abuse of power was executing official US policy. Biden's actions were done on behest of our country.Sorry, but no. What you are trying to do is re characterize his abuse of power by saying "he only used his influence to remove the prosecutor who was going after my sons "consulting" company paychecks, which would have shown a light on the Bindens (again). Besides, other countries wanted the prosecutor removed because he simply was not tough enough on crime."
You dont get to use your power to remove a foreign prosecutor who is looking into corruption because he is not to your liking, especially when he threatens your personal interests in that same country!
Again, you're lying.
Burisma was not under investigation when Shokin was ousted. They had been under investigation, but it was from a time before Hunter Biden was employed.
This is all publicly available information; try educating yourself (although I know you won't).
That so called abuse of power was executing official US policy. Biden's actions were done on behest of our country.
Trump tried to extort Ukraine in an arms for dirt deal for his own personal benefit. Corruption was a cover.
Besides how could someone who steals money from a kids cancer charity be interested in ending corruption?
I tried earlier tho I had been a bit narrower in requesting one filed charge.I'll make it easy on you. Pick ONE
You are referring to appearances not illegality. Politically it does appear sketchy. My guess Joe left the judgement up to Hunter.Okay, lets say what you are saying is correct, that it was on done on behalf of US policy and was also done before Hunter was employed. If you had more than 3 brain cells, and did not have a taste for corruption, wouldn't you tell your son NOT to get a job at a company for $600,000 per year that benefited from your own actions as Vice President?
That sure as hell looks like a payoff to me.
You are referring to appearances not illegality. Politically it does appear sketchy. My guess Joe left the judgement up to Hunter.
Okay, lets say what you are saying is correct, that it was on done on behalf of US policy and was also done before Hunter was employed. If you had more than 3 brain cells, and did not have a taste for corruption, wouldn't you tell your son NOT to get a job at a company for $600,000 per year that benefited from your own actions as Vice President?
That sure as hell looks like a payoff to me.
Okay, lets say what you are saying is correct, that it was on done on behalf of US policy and was also done before Hunter was employed. If you had more than 3 brain cells, and did not have a taste for corruption, wouldn't you tell your son NOT to get a job at a company for $600,000 per year that benefited from your own actions as Vice President?
That sure as hell looks like a payoff to me.
Thank you. And since you are willing to give, I will to - no particular crime has been cited (especially by the left wing media like CNN, MSNBC, CBS or PBS who doesnt care anyway).
So we are not going to slap cuffs on the Bidens....yet.
looks like quid pro quo to me, got something in return for granting ivanka the trademarks.While we’re on the topic of children with benefits...
Ivanka Trump gets initial approval from China for 16 new trademarks—including for 'voting machines'
The approval for Ivanka Trump's trademarks — which comes three months after she said her personal clothing brand was shutting down — occurred "while her father continues to wage a trade war with China," according to the the public interest group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in...www.cnbc.com
Ivanka Trump's Chinese Trademarks - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Ivanka Trump’s fashion brand won approval for 16 new trademarks (including for sausage casing and voting machines) from the Chinese government in October.www.citizensforethics.org
“In May 2018, Ivanka Trump’s business received approval for several new Chinese trademarks a week before President Trump announced that he wanted to lift the ban on the Chinese company ZTE, for violating US sanctions,” CREW said.
“In 2017, the business received three new Chinese trademarks on the same day she dined with Chinese President Xi Jinping,” CREW said.
after the trump klan.Thank you. And since you are willing to give, I will to - no particular crime has been cited (especially by the left wing media like CNN, MSNBC, CBS or PBS who doesnt care anyway).
So we are not going to slap cuffs on the Bidens....yet.
after the trump klan.