Originally posted by: KCfromNC
This is false. The fact that relationships between organisms (both observable features and non-coding "junk" parts of DNA) can be arranged into a tree provides evidence of common descent.Originally posted by: acole1
I am taking an Earth System's class right now and I have had several classes on "Evolution," but I have yet to see any real "proof" that it exists the way most of you think about it.
The only proof they have is that creatures change within their species (which I have no problem with), but there is no evidence that everything came from one cell, millions and billions of years ago.
Well, that and the fact that new species have been observed to have formed, both in the lab and in the wild. But you're right, other than directly observing evolution and having fossil and genetic evidence for the inter-relatedness of species, there's no evidence for evolution and they just assume it to be true.Ask any Earth Science (Evolution) professor about the evidence they have, and they will tell you there is nothing that bridges different species together, besides a theory they assume to be true.
Also, is this the kind of opinion I should get from a biologist about the evidence for evolution : Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution. Or did you have another biologist in mind?
And seriously, who calls biology "earth science" except middle-school students?
Just like physicists will tell you that gravity is "just a theory". Good luck convincing rational people that it's a good reason to jump out of buildings.They will tell you that most of what they believe, is indeed, just a theory.
Or, to be less flip, if you plan to actually participate in science after you graduate as opposed to take a few survey classes to get through school, you should probably take some time to figure out what scientists mean by theory. Hint - it's not the same as "guess".
I find it ironic that you've made it through maybe half of a survey class on geology and are now attacking the education about biology of people who have advanced degrees in biology itself.But, if everyone "intelligent" and "educated" thinks it's true... then, of course it must be true, eh? What I have seen over the years, is that Evolution has been re-defined because this lack of evidence. In class these gaps are conveniently glossed over and not explained.
Have you considered that biology is not explained in your earth systems class because an earth systems class is not a biology class? Your objection is kind of like complaining that you're not learning anything about French literature in a astrophysics class. If you want to learn about biology, take a class on biology, not a geology or climate modeling class.
The only part of this which is true is that some religions are not opposed to accepting the real world. The rest is false. Evolution was never and is not an atheistic only belief, and ID is not science. ID is simply creationism with a simple cut and paste job to change God to "designer".Evolution now has gone from an atheistic only belief, to something that accepts intelligent design as being plausible. Christianity may be bending to accept some of the hard evidences discovered by Evolution, but Evolution, as it is now defined, has definitely shifted to accept intelligent design and realize how much of it is actually pure theory.
Care to be more specific or are you going to stick to innuendos and vague misleading statements? You don't exactly show a towering knowledge of the basic facts of evolutionary biology, "earth system" class or not under your belt.Much of what most of you were taught in school, under the name of Evolution, is no longer held to as firmly as it once was. Most of you are not as well educated on the matter as you think you might be, but your gargantuan egos don't let you see, or admit that fact. I am still open to learning, but it looks like most you aren?t.
And learning is exactly what I recommend you do. Take a real biology class or two. God won't smite you if you learn about his creation from somewhere other than the first few pages of Genesis.
Originally posted by: KCfromNC
This is false. The fact that relationships between organisms (both observable features and non-coding "junk" parts of DNA) can be arranged into a tree provides evidence of common descent.Originally posted by: acole1
I am taking an Earth System's class right now and I have had several classes on "Evolution," but I have yet to see any real "proof" that it exists the way most of you think about it.
The only proof they have is that creatures change within their species (which I have no problem with), but there is no evidence that everything came from one cell, millions and billions of years ago.
Well, that and the fact that new species have been observed to have formed, both in the lab and in the wild. But you're right, other than directly observing evolution and having fossil and genetic evidence for the inter-relatedness of species, there's no evidence for evolution and they just assume it to be true.Ask any Earth Science (Evolution) professor about the evidence they have, and they will tell you there is nothing that bridges different species together, besides a theory they assume to be true.
Also, is this the kind of opinion I should get from a biologist about the evidence for evolution : Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution. Or did you have another biologist in mind?
And seriously, who calls biology "earth science" except middle-school students?
Just like physicists will tell you that gravity is "just a theory". Good luck convincing rational people that it's a good reason to jump out of buildings.They will tell you that most of what they believe, is indeed, just a theory.
Or, to be less flip, if you plan to actually participate in science after you graduate as opposed to take a few survey classes to get through school, you should probably take some time to figure out what scientists mean by theory. Hint - it's not the same as "guess".
I find it ironic that you've made it through maybe half of a survey class on geology and are now attacking the education about biology of people who have advanced degrees in biology itself.But, if everyone "intelligent" and "educated" thinks it's true... then, of course it must be true, eh? What I have seen over the years, is that Evolution has been re-defined because this lack of evidence. In class these gaps are conveniently glossed over and not explained.
Have you considered that biology is not explained in your earth systems class because an earth systems class is not a biology class? Your objection is kind of like complaining that you're not learning anything about French literature in a astrophysics class. If you want to learn about biology, take a class on biology, not a geology or climate modeling class.
The only part of this which is true is that some religions are not opposed to accepting the real world. The rest is false. Evolution was never and is not an atheistic only belief, and ID is not science. ID is simply creationism with a simple cut and paste job to change God to "designer".Evolution now has gone from an atheistic only belief, to something that accepts intelligent design as being plausible. Christianity may be bending to accept some of the hard evidences discovered by Evolution, but Evolution, as it is now defined, has definitely shifted to accept intelligent design and realize how much of it is actually pure theory.
Care to be more specific or are you going to stick to innuendos and vague misleading statements? You don't exactly show a towering knowledge of the basic facts of evolutionary biology, "earth system" class or not under your belt.Much of what most of you were taught in school, under the name of Evolution, is no longer held to as firmly as it once was. Most of you are not as well educated on the matter as you think you might be, but your gargantuan egos don't let you see, or admit that fact. I am still open to learning, but it looks like most you aren?t.
And learning is exactly what I recommend you do. Take a real biology class or two. God won't smite you if you learn about his creation from somewhere other than the first few pages of Genesis.
Originally posted by: Ipno
I can't wait to go and visit the flat earth wing also...
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: Zaitsev
Originally posted by: acole1
I am taking an Earth System's class right now and I have had several classes on "Evolution," but I have yet to see any real "proof" that it exists the way most of you think about it.
The only proof they have is that creatures change within their species (which I have no problem with), but there is no evidence that everything came from one cell, millions and billions of years ago.
Ask any Earth Science (Evolution) professor about the evidence they have, and they will tell you there is nothing that bridges different species together, besides a theory they assume to be true. They will tell you that most of what they believe, is indeed, just a theory. But, if everyone "intelligent" and "educated" thinks it's true... then, of course it must be true, eh? What I have seen over the years, is that Evolution has been re-defined because this lack of evidence. In class these gaps are conveniently glossed over and not explained.
Evolution now has gone from an atheistic only belief, to something that accepts intelligent design as being plausible. Christianity may be bending to accept some of the hard evidences discovered by Evolution, but Evolution, as it is now defined, has definitely shifted to accept intelligent design and realize how much of it is actually pure theory.
Much of what most of you were taught in school, under the name of Evolution, is no longer held to as firmly as it once was. Most of you are not as well educated on the matter as you think you might be, but your gargantuan egos don't let you see, or admit that fact. I am still open to learning, but it looks like most you aren?t.
Well, I'm late for GS lab, so I'll have to stop there...
I don't believe that you've ever taken an evolution class...
The thing is, what creationists do is attempt to take anything that isn't fully there and try to exploit it to death. That is, let's explain evolution in a sort of numerical sense. Say a species went from 1-100 to hit its current form. To a creationist, if example #67 is missing, nothing works rather than people who accept evolution would just say "they just haven't found it yet." Which is quite typical in the field; that is, they haven't found certain fossils, but they know they exist and do eventually find them.
Originally posted by: FireChicken
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: Zaitsev
Originally posted by: acole1
I am taking an Earth System's class right now and I have had several classes on "Evolution," but I have yet to see any real "proof" that it exists the way most of you think about it.
The only proof they have is that creatures change within their species (which I have no problem with), but there is no evidence that everything came from one cell, millions and billions of years ago.
Ask any Earth Science (Evolution) professor about the evidence they have, and they will tell you there is nothing that bridges different species together, besides a theory they assume to be true. They will tell you that most of what they believe, is indeed, just a theory. But, if everyone "intelligent" and "educated" thinks it's true... then, of course it must be true, eh? What I have seen over the years, is that Evolution has been re-defined because this lack of evidence. In class these gaps are conveniently glossed over and not explained.
Evolution now has gone from an atheistic only belief, to something that accepts intelligent design as being plausible. Christianity may be bending to accept some of the hard evidences discovered by Evolution, but Evolution, as it is now defined, has definitely shifted to accept intelligent design and realize how much of it is actually pure theory.
Much of what most of you were taught in school, under the name of Evolution, is no longer held to as firmly as it once was. Most of you are not as well educated on the matter as you think you might be, but your gargantuan egos don't let you see, or admit that fact. I am still open to learning, but it looks like most you aren?t.
Well, I'm late for GS lab, so I'll have to stop there...
I don't believe that you've ever taken an evolution class...
The thing is, what creationists do is attempt to take anything that isn't fully there and try to exploit it to death. That is, let's explain evolution in a sort of numerical sense. Say a species went from 1-100 to hit its current form. To a creationist, if example #67 is missing, nothing works rather than people who accept evolution would just say "they just haven't found it yet." Which is quite typical in the field; that is, they haven't found certain fossils, but they know they exist and do eventually find them.
QFT
The thing is, theres sooo much less evidence that there is a god than the existence of Evolution. Yet they discount evolution so easily.