3770k stuck at 4.3GHz

Mears

Platinum Member
Mar 9, 2000
2,095
1
81
Just bought a 3770K to replace a 3770 that I accidentally bought. Now I'm thinking I should've kept the 3770. I can't seem to get this thing stable past 4.3 GHz. If I set the multiplier to 44, bumping the vcore all the way up to 1.3v isn't enough to get it through more than a couple hours of Linx. My board is a Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H. I haven't touched the bus frequency at all. From everything I read, I thought 4.5GHz would be very much obtainable.
 

Phynaz

Lifer
Mar 13, 2006
10,140
819
126
Every chip is different. But think of it this way, what you are getting now is only 4% away from what you wanted. I'm building mine now and I'm only shooting for 4.4Ghz.
 

2is

Diamond Member
Apr 8, 2012
4,281
131
106
Does that board have LLC? (Load Line Calibration)? My guess is vdroop is the main cause of your instability at 4.3GHz.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
Enable CPU internal PLL overvoltage and set LLC to something higher. I don't know what your BIOS calls the LLC levels but on mine it's low, medium, high, very high etc. Some boards have it listed as level 1, level 2 etc.
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,249
136
Just bought a 3770K to replace a 3770 that I accidentally bought. Now I'm thinking I should've kept the 3770. I can't seem to get this thing stable past 4.3 GHz. If I set the multiplier to 44, bumping the vcore all the way up to 1.3v isn't enough to get it through more than a couple hours of Linx. My board is a Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H. I haven't touched the bus frequency at all. From everything I read, I thought 4.5GHz would be very much obtainable.


What did you build your rig for?
Gaming?
Encoding?
LinX?
Fold @ Home?
Scientific calculations for NASA?


Depending on your planned uses a couple of hours of LinX could equate to never seeing an issue at all with the overclock

Enable CPU internal PLL overvoltage and set LLC to something higher. I don't know what your BIOS calls the LLC levels but on mine it's low, medium, high, very high etc. Some boards have it listed as level 1, level 2 etc.

I doubt he'd need PLL overvoltage at such a low overclock.
 

borisvodofsky

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2010
3,606
0
0
There is no way your 3770k is THAT terrible.

Like the others have said, you need to use M0ar voltage.

I looked up your board. Not the best motherboard for overclocking. WHICH means one thing, M0AR voltage. :sneaky:


So in conclusion, M0AR voltage!!
 

borisvodofsky

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2010
3,606
0
0
If you'd like, we can help you fine-tune the whole thing, If you post screen shots of EVERY bios page relevant to overclocking, memory, memory voltage, cpu, cpu voltage, memory timings, cpu power states.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
What did you build your rig for?
Gaming?
Encoding?
LinX?
Fold @ Home?
Scientific calculations for NASA?


Depending on your planned uses a couple of hours of LinX could equate to never seeing an issue at all with the overclock



I doubt he'd need PLL overvoltage at such a low overclock.

You think so, but when I turned it off any overclock I did past 4.2Ghz wouldn't work.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
I thought 4.5GHz was for Sandy Bridge, and Ivy Bridge was a bit behind due to temperatures?

I don't know, but most everyone I've seen who has had decent cooling has been able to take a 3570k to 4.4 - 4.5. It's more about the cooling than the chip itself from what I've seen. Very hard to contend with the heat.
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,249
136
You think so, but when I turned it off ANY overclock I did wouldn't work.

IB's temps kept me from being an early adopter so I haven't tried one yet. I figured they would tend to be similar to SB's or better when it comes to needing Internal PLL overvoltage enabled.

I've tested 5 SB's and the worst one needed Internall PLL overvoltage enabled at 4.5ghz with the best one (in sig) only needing it beyond 5ghz.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
IB's temps kept me from being an early adopter so I haven't tried one yet. I figured they would tend to be similar to SB's or better when it comes to needing Internal PLL overvoltage enabled.

I've tested 5 SB's and the worst one needed Internall PLL overvoltage enabled at 4.5ghz with the best one (in sig) only needing it beyond 5ghz.

I had to make a correction to my post. Over 4.2Ghz didn't work without it. Not anything over stock. Still, I'd leave it on as it really hurts nothing and can help out.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,118
59
91
IB's temps kept me from being an early adopter so I haven't tried one yet. I figured they would tend to be similar to SB's or better when it comes to needing Internal PLL overvoltage enabled.

I've tested 5 SB's and the worst one needed Internall PLL overvoltage enabled at 4.5ghz with the best one (in sig) only needing it beyond 5ghz.

Considering what the "internal PLL overvoltage" does, it is one of those things that most certainly should not be expected to scale one way or the other with the underlying process technology as it involves a lot of analog circuitry and scaling analog cmos is not easy or straightforward.

Given the OP's quandry, I'd like to know his temperatures when loaded. Cooling may simply be inadequate.

That said, enabling the "internal PLL overvoltage" merely as a means of determining if it is infact the limiting factor in his overclock should be tested if for no other reason than to rule it out as being unnecessary.
 

TekDemon

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2001
2,297
1
81
What kind of cooling do you have? Maybe you're being too aggressive on the voltage and overloading your cooling solution.
But ivy really is pretty terrible in terms of clocks.
 

2is

Diamond Member
Apr 8, 2012
4,281
131
106
What did you build your rig for?
Gaming?
Encoding?
LinX?
Fold @ Home?
Scientific calculations for NASA?


Depending on your planned uses a couple of hours of LinX could equate to never seeing an issue at all with the overclock



I doubt he'd need PLL overvoltage at such a low overclock.

You'd be surprised. I tried 4.3 GHz with a +.15 offset and blue screened within a minute of running prime small FFT. Enabled internal PLL over voltage, kept everything else the same and re-ran prime. It ran for a good 10-15 min before getting an error on one of the cores. But no BSOD or lockup. A bump to +.20 stabilized it. Without internal PLL Overvoltage I needed to enable LLC for stability which was a lot harder on the CPU.
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,249
136
You'd be surprised. I tried 4.3 GHz with a +.15 offset and blue screened within a minute of running prime small FFT. Enabled internal PLL over voltage, kept everything else the same and re-ran prime. It ran for a good 10-15 min before getting an error on one of the cores. But no BSOD or lockup. A bump to +.20 stabilized it. Without internal PLL Overvoltage I needed to enable LLC for stability which was a lot harder on the CPU.

To this day I've not tested a Ivy Bridge....Maybe pretty soon if I decide to downsize my rig.

On the Sandy Bridge it was one of those need it to boot at ??x things for the most part. If I could boot and load windows without it then I could get stability.

Guess maybe Ivy Bridge is more dependant on PLL overvoltage.
 

hokies83

Senior member
Oct 3, 2010
837
2
76
I can enable LLC and get 4.6ghz with volts set to auto and passed 6hrs of Prime 95.
 

hokies83

Senior member
Oct 3, 2010
837
2
76
See this is what I'm talking about "Volts set to auto"..

This is how you get face speared.

Indeed.. was seeing how far i could go on auto.

I am able to do 5ghz with 1.37v And it passed 6 hrs of prime 95. with temps around 90c On Air.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |