Yet another rant about 3Dmark05, but when I ran this 'benchmark' for the first time yesterday, I was just plain insulted. How can a systen that gets 45000 Aquamarks get 1100 in 3dmark05? Sure, the tests were beautiful, but they ALL ran at less than 2FPS the ENTIRE time. What is Futuremark up to? Do they think everyone has an Athlon64 with a 6800 Ultra? Will even THAT setup run smoothly?
Looks to me like they are trying to get people to buy a professional license so that they can run it at a lesser resolution, considering that I'm willing to bet that < %90 of all computers can't handle the benchmark smoothly.
I know that I only have a lowly 5900xt, which is considered a mid-range card - but I felt like I was running a TNT2 M64....what gives? It should be renamed to 'the fat-wallet' benchmark. Pox on you, Futuremark.
Looks to me like they are trying to get people to buy a professional license so that they can run it at a lesser resolution, considering that I'm willing to bet that < %90 of all computers can't handle the benchmark smoothly.
I know that I only have a lowly 5900xt, which is considered a mid-range card - but I felt like I was running a TNT2 M64....what gives? It should be renamed to 'the fat-wallet' benchmark. Pox on you, Futuremark.