Originally posted by: Wurrmm
It is not that low end. And I think it has similar features to the Asus at the same price.
Originally posted by: LittleBoo
umm, look again.
Originally posted by: Willy9Boy
Synch settings (1:1)
Fsb CPU DDR
200 3000 400
[...]
Asynch (5:4)
200 3000 320
250 3750 400
266 3990 426
[...] If they are, my original question still stands, although the numbers make it a bit closer. If I only plan to overclock to about 250 fsb (only?) DDR400 could be used at 5:4 and faster memory is not needed. Is this correct?
Originally posted by: WizardNJ
FYI, I was not able to get my P4 3.0C to run at 250 FSB. Runs ok at 240 (with mem @ 383).
Dave
Originally posted by: Scroatdog
Originally posted by: WizardNJ
FYI, I was not able to get my P4 3.0C to run at 250 FSB. Runs ok at 240 (with mem @ 383).
Dave
Cooling??????
Originally posted by: Sunfox
As has been mentioned before, the low-end Gigabyte uses the ICH5R.
Originally posted by: alancabra
The 8IPE1000 uses the Kinnereth-R for Lan. I believe that is using CSA at 10/100 but I'm not positive. Does anyone know? It's only $149. They also have the 8IK1100. The 8IK1100 doesn't seem to use the ICH5.
Originally posted by: jose
Does the CSA buse support a non intel nic ?
Why don't the 875p mobo's have a pci-X buses ? If Intel were serious about the current pci buse being saturated, then why not have a 66mhz 64bit pci buse ?
Originally posted by: jose
Does the CSA buse support a non intel nic ?
Why don't the 875p mobo's have a pci-X buses ? If Intel were serious about the current pci buse being saturated, then why not have a 66mhz 64bit pci buse ?
Regards,
Jose
Originally posted by: SnowBoarder9455
Hey,
Any idea how long until they put up the other reviews?